Speaking of “the Church”

Last updated on: December 5, 2014 at 4:11 pm by David Mills

Speaking of “the Church” 2014-12-05T16:11:13-04:00 David Mills

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A friend commenting on an article I’d commended — Rebecca Hamilton’s The Murder of Innocents is Wrong and Every Human Being Knows It — criticized her use of “the Church” in this passage, which I’d quoted:

The arguments which gave legal abortion sufficient moral gravitas to hook into the public imagination were based on real terrors such as rape and the fear of being forced to give a baby up for adoption.

These arguments found their traction in the sexual double standard and the vast cruelty and hypocrisy — oftentimes supported by the Church — that allowed it. Abortion was taken as an answer to violence against women, discrimination and prejudice against women, and the suffering of women because of these things. We turned to the murder of innocents rather than face our sins against women and repent of them.

My friend wrote: “Not to state the obvious, but ‘the Church’ did not support cruelty and hypocrisy. Individuals Catholics, albeit some with great power, did.”

I see her point, and it’s often true that when critics of the Church say “the Church” they are using the sins of some people in a huge, ancient, complex, and diverse enterprise to attack the whole. Because so many western bishops enabled sexual abusers to continue abusing children, the whole thing is a failure or a fraud from the beginning, is the kind of thing you see. Bad medieval popes, the Inquisition, Catholic Nazis, and lots of other scandals are used this way.

But sometimes the term is a legitimate way to describe what was in effect the attitude, or practice, or culture of the whole Church, the Church as she is experienced at a specific time and place. What, to put it another way, you could reliably expect from the Church’s representatives in a particular situation. You can legitimately say, for example, that the Church was careless of the sexual abuse of minors for many decades because almost everyone in authority would not deal with it rightly.

The other side of this, however, is that we can speak of the Church when we speak of the characteristic good works of her people. We can speak, and proudly, of the Church’s defense of the unborn and other marginalized people whose lives are endangered. We can speak of the Church’s many corporal acts of mercy.

Rhetorically, in other words, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

Catholic issues

Previous Post

December 3, 2014

Conservatives v. the Police

Next Post

December 5, 2014 Enlightened Racism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion & life American Life Anglican Affairs Apologetics Art and artistry Beer Capitalism's downside Catholic converts Catholic issues Catholicism & public life Catholicism in general Christianity & culture Christianity & the Jews Conservatism Conservative problems Death Do unto others Dogs Ecumenical friendship Evangelicalism Evil in the world Family Friendship Heroes How we should live Islam It's a funny old world Jews Judaism Israel Judaism justice Liberalism Life issues Marriage Mary Mass Media Modern culture good & bad Modern life as it is lived Modern Religion Mormonism People Personal reflections Politicians Protestantism Race Rand & Randiansm Secularisms Sexualities Society justice equality freedom The papacy & the pope Uncategorized Worship Writing & Language

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the garden where Jesus prayed before His arrest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eden Gethsemane Golgotha Bethany