Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

David Mills

Tricksy Marketing

Last updated on: October 12, 2014 at 4:00 pm   by David Mills

Tricksy Marketing 2014-10-10T21:49:33-04:00 David Mills

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Consumerist calls the practice “the grocery shrink ray.” That’s when “the manufacturers of food and consumer goods make their products smaller — sometimes almost imperceptibly smaller — rather than raise prices. You know what it looks like: it’s why your toilet paper doesn’t quite fill the holder anymore, and why you don’t get as many servings of hot chocolate as you used to.” Companies have been doing it, this article reports, for a long time, and has the pictures to prove it.

I’d written something on this a few years ago for the First Things weblog, taking up the report in a New York Times story titled Food Inflation Kept Hidden in Tinier Bags. Because the prices of raw materials are going up, food companies have developed various ways of maintaining their profits by hiding the fact that they’re offering less than they did before.

Ms. Stauber, 33, said she began inspecting her other purchases, aisle by aisle. Many canned vegetables dropped to 13 or 14 ounces from 16; boxes of baby wipes went to 72 from 80; and sugar was stacked in 4-pound, not 5-pound, bags, she said.

Five or so years ago, Ms. Stauber bought 16-ounce cans of corn. Then they were 15.5 ounces, then 14.5 ounces, and the size is still dropping. “The first time I’ve ever seen an 11-ounce can of corn at the store was about three weeks ago, and I was just floored,” she said. “It’s sneaky, because they figure people won’t know.”

In every economic downturn in the last few decades, companies have reduced the size of some products, disguising price increases and avoiding comparisons on same-size packages, before and after an increase. Each time, the marketing campaigns are coy; this time, the smaller versions are “greener” (packages good for the environment) or more “portable” (little carry bags for the takeout lifestyle) or “healthier” (fewer calories) . . . .

“Consumers are generally more sensitive to changes in prices than to changes in quantity,” John T. Gourville, a marketing professor at Harvard Business School, said. “And companies try to do it in such a way that you don’t notice, maybe keeping the height and width the same, but changing the depth so the silhouette of the package on the shelf looks the same. Or sometimes they add more air to the chips bag or a scoop in the bottom of the peanut butter jar so it looks the same size.”

The article goes on to describe other techniques of the same deceptive kind. This is the sort of thing that makes a supporter of the market cringe — or ought to, though it doesn’t always. Of course these companies need to account for the rise in their costs, which means that the consumers will have to pay more for their products.

No one expects the shareholders to sacrifice so the rest of us can pay less for our banana nut chocolate chip raisin rum mint swirl ice cream or southwestern jalapeño onion and salsa flavored tortilla chips, or even for our rice or flour or eggs.  We have those things because someone has gone to the trouble of procuring them, turning them into a product, and then delivering it to a store where we can buy it, and they ought to be paid for doing so.

But tricking people into thinking they’re getting what they used to get for the old price is just lying. It’s tricksy, as Gollum would put it (and he would know). It may be a technique that passes without comment in many of the business schools and corporate marketing departments in America, but still, they shouldn’t be deceiving people into buying something thinking it’s another thing.

Yes, consumers are responsible for making wise choices and looking at things like the size of the package, though a gentleman would not take advantage of the simple, naive, and trusting. But still, you don’t lie to people just because they’re responsible for catching you when you do.

Imagine if one of your children tried something like this, pulling a fast one on a sibling or neighbor in trading Halloween candy, say. No good parent would reward him for his shrewdness in anticipating the ignorance of his victims. You’d correct him, and punish him if necessary, and try to teach him the necessity of transparency and truthfulness, of making fair deals even if that means going out of his way to make sure the other person knows exactly what he’s giving up and what he’s getting, and doing so even when transparency might ruin the deal.

There is no difference here in what we ought to expect of the growing child and what we ought to expect of the grown-up corporation.

Capitalism's downside

Previous Post



October 10, 2014

She is a deathless immortal, born from the sea, radiant as the sun

Next Post



October 12, 2014 The Politician's Character


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion & life American Life Anglican Affairs Apologetics Art and artistry Beer Capitalism's downside Catholic converts Catholic issues Catholicism & public life Catholicism in general Christianity & culture Christianity & the Jews Conservatism Conservative problems Death Do unto others Dogs Ecumenical friendship Evangelicalism Evil in the world Family Friendship Heroes How we should live Islam It's a funny old world Jews Judaism Israel Judaism justice Liberalism Life issues Marriage Mary Mass Media Modern culture good & bad Modern life as it is lived Modern Religion Mormonism People Personal reflections Politicians Protestantism Race Rand & Randiansm Secularisms Sexualities Society justice equality freedom The papacy & the pope Uncategorized Worship Writing & Language

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group believes in a "Memorial" instead of a traditional communion?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Anglicans Jehovah’s Witnesses Lutherans Catholics

Related posts from David Mills

Catholic

Commercial Debasement

David Mills

Catholic

Why Some People "Fail At Life"

David Mills

Catholic

Who Really Fails at Life

David Mills

Catholic

Deneen on the Catholic Neo-Conservative Division

David Mills

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube