The Inhumanist John Gray

Last updated on: October 14, 2014 at 7:47 pm by David Mills

The Inhumanist John Gray 2014-10-14T19:47:27-04:00 David Mills

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Spiked! review begins promisingly with a favorite quote from G. K. Chesterton and goes on to take apart the “inhumanism” of philosopher John Gray’s The Silence of Animals: On Progress and Other Modern Myths. Anthony McCarthy writes, after quoting Gray’s “When truth is at odds with meaning, it is meaning that wins,” a sentence he points out is meaningless:

This assertion comes after an excursus into the nature of myth and is followed by several pages of praise for Sigmund Freud who, Gray says, taught us to live without consolation, be it religious or a quasi-religious faith in ‘progress’. It is difficult to know what to make of this section in light of the words which end it, seemingly influenced by the poet Wallace Stephens: ‘Knowing there is nothing of substance in our world may seem to rob that world of value. But this nothingness may be our most precious possession, since it opens to us the world that exists beyond ourselves.’

Knowing there is nothing opens us up to . . . that same nothing? One does not have to hold that hope is a virtue – for some indeed, one of the great theological virtues – to see this as perverse. The idea that in our lives we can make rational choices which fulfil our nature and allow us to flourish as the kind of beings we are helps us to understand that we can also make choices which gradually reduce who we are and move us towards emptiness and nothingness — evil choices, if you will.

In the above passage, nothingness is embraced, being rejected, truth discarded. Rationality, order, goodness, logos — apparently we ‘know’ (and what does it mean to ‘know’ in this mindset?) they are ‘nothing of substance’. That Gray contradicts himself with every purposeful sentence he writes seems not to concern him (but what’s the use of concern anyway, on Gray’s view?).

“Progress” seems to mean not exactly progress but simply what most of us would have thought basic humanism: that the world has meaning and that man is a good if flawed thing. Man doesn’t have to get better for that to remain true. Gray proposals a kind of live in the moment philosophy — and be silent like the animals rather than speak as if your words meant something — though why live at all is the question his argument leads one to ask. The book has been much praised nevertheless.

My thanks to Prufrock for the link.

Secularisms

Previous Post

October 14, 2014

Brave New Apple & Facebook

Next Post

October 16, 2014 Limbaugh is Killing Conservative Talk Radio

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion & life American Life Anglican Affairs Apologetics Art and artistry Beer Capitalism's downside Catholic converts Catholic issues Catholicism & public life Catholicism in general Christianity & culture Christianity & the Jews Conservatism Conservative problems Death Do unto others Dogs Ecumenical friendship Evangelicalism Evil in the world Family Friendship Heroes How we should live Islam It's a funny old world Jews Judaism Israel Judaism justice Liberalism Life issues Marriage Mary Mass Media Modern culture good & bad Modern life as it is lived Modern Religion Mormonism People Personal reflections Politicians Protestantism Race Rand & Randiansm Secularisms Sexualities Society justice equality freedom The papacy & the pope Uncategorized Worship Writing & Language

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I became queen through a beauty contest, hiding my Jewish identity at my cousin's advice. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Esther Ruth Sarah Vashti