Watch Out for Nice People

Last updated on: July 15, 2014 at 12:45 am by David Mills

Watch Out for Nice People 2014-07-15T00:45:24-04:00 David Mills

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Apparent good news for writers and others on the cranky end of the personality scale: “Those who are described as ‘agreeable, conscientious personalities’ are,” according to a study in The Journal of Personality reported on news.mic, “more likely to follow orders and deliver electric shocks that they believe can harm innocent people, while ‘more contrarian, less agreeable personalities’ are more likely to refuse to hurt others.”

. . . People who were normally friendly followed orders because they didn’t want to upset others, while those who were described as unfriendly stuck up for themselves.

“The irony is that a personality disposition normally seen as antisocial — disagreeableness — may actually be linked to ‘pro-social’ behavior,'” writes Psychology Today‘s Kenneth Worthy. “This connection seems to arise from a willingness to sacrifice one’s popularity a bit to act in a moral and just way toward other people, animals or the environment at large. Popularity, in the end, may be more a sign of social graces and perhaps a desire to fit in than any kind of moral superiority.”

Aha! one would like to say, because contrarians like people to agree with them, but several commenters point out the problems with the study. For example:

[T]his study doesn’t actually imply that contrarians resist authority for moral reasons. It just implies contrarians resist authority. Which, well . . . duh! They should have given the subjects orders which didn’t have a moral element if they wanted to be able to give the conclusion they came to (like to keep doing a pointless repetitive task, or do something embarrass [the comment ends here]

But still, there is something to be said for the contrarian personality. When everyone is running one way, you may stand to the side just because you don’t like running with the crowd, but as a result you have more time to decide which way you should be running. This applies to moral panics, for one thing.

People

Previous Post

July 9, 2014

Lewis & Orwell on Language

Next Post

July 10, 2014 Readings (10 July 2014)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion & life American Life Anglican Affairs Apologetics Art and artistry Beer Capitalism's downside Catholic converts Catholic issues Catholicism & public life Catholicism in general Christianity & culture Christianity & the Jews Conservatism Conservative problems Death Do unto others Dogs Ecumenical friendship Evangelicalism Evil in the world Family Friendship Heroes How we should live Islam It's a funny old world Jews Judaism Israel Judaism justice Liberalism Life issues Marriage Mary Mass Media Modern culture good & bad Modern life as it is lived Modern Religion Mormonism People Personal reflections Politicians Protestantism Race Rand & Randiansm Secularisms Sexualities Society justice equality freedom The papacy & the pope Uncategorized Worship Writing & Language

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Hebrews, Abel's blood spoke, but what does Jesus' blood speak?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Words of warning Words of judgment A better word than the blood of Abel The same message as Abel's