Judging Israel

Last updated on: July 24, 2014 at 11:08 am by David Mills

Judging Israel 2014-07-24T11:08:01-04:00 David Mills

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Driving back from a trip a couple of days ago, I was listening to one of NPR’s news programs, which began with a long tape of a reporter in Gaza telling us about what she was seeing, beginning in a neighborhood being attacked and ending in a hospital, and the stories she told were, of course, heartbreaking. Neither the reporter nor the hosts made any political comments but the placement of the story, its length, and the personal stories it told did.

A little later one of the hosts interviewed an Israeli defense analyst, a little more aggressively than NPR hosts are wont to do. the man’s analysis, the analysis he’d been invited on the show to give, sounded calculating and cold in comparison with the tragic stories we’d just heard. NPR offered no balancing story of life in Israel lived under the constant threat of missiles fired by Hamas. Israel’s success in creating the “iron dome” to protect its people ironically deprived reporters of the chance to tell heart-breaking stories, though it’s a question how many would had they the chance.

“Israel is willfully killing civilians” is the subtext of many of the news stories in the Western press and much of the enraged commentary we see on the web. That was the effective lesson of NPR’s reports the day I listened even though the show was formally objective (no side was overtly taken) and balanced (stories were offered covering both sides). When one side has the stories and the other the analysis, the one with the stories wins the hearts of the listeners.

This must stop. There are really only two explanations for Israel’s attack on Gaza: either Israel is defending itself against an enemy who places its weapons among civilians and is defending itself as humanely as possible, as the nation claims, or it is intentionally killing men, women, and children, destroying their homes and businesses, and taking out the hospitals that would treat them when they’re injured.

Is the second really plausible? Is Israel the kind of country to do that? Is it really a terrorist state? No. The charge against Israel, whether made explicitly or implicitly, is a slander against a nation that should have our sympathy for its struggle and admiration for its restraint in resistance.

Jews Judaism Israel

Media

Previous Post

July 24, 2014

The MBTI Explains the Limits of Open-Mindedness

Next Post

July 25, 2014 False Beauties

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion & life American Life Anglican Affairs Apologetics Art and artistry Beer Capitalism's downside Catholic converts Catholic issues Catholicism & public life Catholicism in general Christianity & culture Christianity & the Jews Conservatism Conservative problems Death Do unto others Dogs Ecumenical friendship Evangelicalism Evil in the world Family Friendship Heroes How we should live Islam It's a funny old world Jews Judaism Israel Judaism justice Liberalism Life issues Marriage Mary Mass Media Modern culture good & bad Modern life as it is lived Modern Religion Mormonism People Personal reflections Politicians Protestantism Race Rand & Randiansm Secularisms Sexualities Society justice equality freedom The papacy & the pope Uncategorized Worship Writing & Language

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which short letter urges forgiveness for a runaway slave named Onesimus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

2 Timothy Titus Jude Philemon