Reading the Bible Critically and Religiously: Interview with Dr. Marc Zvi Brettler

Last updated on: October 21, 2014 at 10:03 am by David Bokovoy

Reading the Bible Critically and Religiously: Interview with Dr. Marc Zvi Brettler 2014-10-21T10:03:22-06:00 David Bokovoy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Brigham Young University’s Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship continues to offer impressive contributions in the field of Religious Studies. I highly recommend listening to their recent podcast interview with biblical scholar Marc Zvi Brettler. Dr. Brettler is the Dora Golding Professor of Biblical Studies at Brandeis University. Blair Hodges, the Institute’s public communications specialist and acquisitions and development editor, conducts the interview. Hodges does an excellent job formulating thoughtful questions on the topic of approaching the Bible as both believer and critical scholar. The entire interview is well-worth listening to. It’s an incredibly thoughtful discussion on a variety of issues.

I believe one of the highlights was Dr. Brettler’s response to Blair’s question concerning source criticism that draws upon an analogy articulated by British social anthropologist, Edmund Leach. Leach famously criticized the pursuit of biblical source criticism as an impossible effort that by analogy amounts to an unsuccessful attempt at “unscrambling the omelet.” Dr. Brettler’s response to this critique is well-worth noting. He explains that from his perspective, when he looks critically at the Hebrew Bible, Brettler does not see an omelet at all. Instead, a more appropriate metaphor for what Dr. Brettler’s sees would be “eggs over easy.” In other words, unlike an omelet, Brettler still sees in the Bible the white, the yolk, etc., which can be dissected from its source.

While it’s true that documentary sources in the Pentateuch have been mixed together, they’re not blended in the way an omelet combines separate elements. Granted, there are editorial insertions, and redactional deletions in the biblical omelet. But we can still extract the Priestly source, the Yahwistic thread, the Elohist document from Genesis, for instance, since these various parts more or less still appear upon the proverbial plate.

Ultimately, the discussion focuses upon the topic explored in the book The Bible and the Believer: How to Read the Bible Critically and Religiously. Hodges questions and Brettler’s thoughtful responses present a podcast on this important subject that I would strongly encourage religious readers of the Bible to carefully consider.

Bible

Documentary Hypothesis

Historical Criticism

Mormon Studies

Religion

Previous Post

July 10, 2014

Scripture, Translation, and Belief: the LDS Book of Abraham

Next Post

November 9, 2014 The Neo-Documentary Hypothesis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Book of Mormon Documentary Hypothesis Eden Eve Feminism Genesis goddesses Gods Historical Criticism Judaism Mormon Studies New Testament Prophecy Prophets Religion Religious Studies Social Justice Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2015 July 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 July 2014 April 2014 March 2014 January 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Deborah was a prophetess and judge who led Israel to victory over the Canaanites.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE