Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Sola Scriptura: the “Uglier Dad” Supposed “Defense” [?!]

Sola Scriptura: the “Uglier Dad” Supposed “Defense” [?!]

Last updated on: June 13, 2026 at 1:09 pm by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Sola Scriptura: the “Uglier Dad” Supposed “Defense” [?!] 2026-06-13T13:09:13-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a transcript of the initial main presentation of the video, Ortlund Cooper and Horton try to Prove Sola Scriptura [and Fail!] [Catholic Bible Highlights with Kenny Burchard, 12-14-25].

*****

It seems to me the most self-evident thing in the world that if the Bible were in fact the only infallible authority in the Christian faith (that’s what sola Scriptura means), the Bible itself would make this clear beyond all dispute. Yet we find again and again, that when Protestant apologists attempt to defend sola Scriptura: one of the two “pillars” of the so-called “Reformation” along with faith alone, they often wind up presenting either irrelevant Bible passages that prove no such thing, or, remarkably enough, none at all.

A classic case of this occurred recently, when three Protestants, all with doctorate degrees in theology, got together: Baptist Gavin Ortlund, Lutheran Jordan Cooper, and Michael Horton, who is Reformed. The video is called, “Is Scripture the Only Infallible Rule?” (11-25-25). Basically, all we got was the ad hominem fallacy known as “your dad’s uglier than mine”. It’s a very common Protestant tactic when addressing disagreements with Catholicism.

Rather than defend their own view, and from the Bible, they deliberately change the topic and attack opposing Catholic positions (the “uglier dad” so to speak). But this helps no one to understand why they ought to believe in sola Scriptura. It reminds one also of the old saying in legal circles: “If the facts aren’t on your side, pound the law. If the law is against you, pound the facts. If neither are on your side, pound the table.”

Gavin gets the ball rolling by stating:

our purpose is to respond to various criticisms of the Protestant Reformation. We believe the Reformation was a good thing and we want to defend it and celebrate the goods of it. The focus here is on scripture and the Protestant emphasis upon scripture, specifically the doctrine of sola scriptura.

Then they launch into a discussion of the Catholic view of tradition. This is at least related to the topic at hand, but again, whatever we Catholics believe doesn’t help a Protestant know how and why sola Scriptura is worthy of acceptance. That must proceed on a different basis than examining the view of someone outside the fold. But they dig in, and here’s what Dr. Horton says:

That’s why Calvin said to Sadoleto, “We’re assailed by two sects, the Pope and the Anabaptists.” Because they both share in common a belief in continuing office of apostle who speaks the very word of God and receives new revelations and therefore bury the word of God. It’s basically circumventing both scripture and tradition.

Now, if the topic were apostolic succession or the papacy, this would be relevant. But when the topic is defending sola Scriptura it’s irrelevant in the final analysis. And we even have the obligatory misrepresentation of infallibility. It’s so bad that Ortlund had to jump in and clarify. Here’s what he said:

They will of course not say that the pope is, you know, speaking new revelations. They will not use this language.

Okay, so if this is understood, why say the misguided thing in the first place, and why wasn’t it edited out? Or is it assumed – I hope not — that Catholics are being deceptive when they deny this? Then within ten minutes, Marian doctrine inevitably gets mentioned and they go even further afield, with Dr. Ortlund saying this,

There’s a difference between a group of Christians saying, “Hey, the Apostle Paul told us to do X, Y, and Z three weeks ago, and so that’s a tradition that we are obeying, right?” That’s different from me trying to sort through the immaculate conception of Mary.

Okay, Kenny, if I had a dime for every time I’ve seen a Protestant switch the topic to Mary when they were supposedly defending their own view, I’d be richer than Elon Musk. It’s also inevitable in Protestant discussions of sola Scriptura that they will cite Church fathers talking about the material sufficiency of Scripture. And so Dr. Horton – at 12:05 in the video — quotes Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Tertullian, Athanasius, Cyril of Jerusalem, and John Chrysostom, which is perfectly irrelevant because we agree with all of what they wrote about the uniqueness of the Bible, and none of it comes within a million miles of proving sola Scriptura.

On my Church Fathers web page I have articles about all six of those men [follow the links to their names above to get to them], alongside almost all the major fathers, proving from many of their own words that none of them believed in sola Scriptura, because they accepted other infallible authorities. But those documented facts are always, for some reason, ignored. I’ve observed this over and over, too, in my 35 years as a Catholic apologist. And these are professors doing this. It’s indefensible. Dr. Ortlund then argues:

we believe scripture is the inspired speech of God. And there’s so many passages we could go to, to develop the language for this. I think one of the strongest is to go to Jesus himself and his ways of describing the Old Testament, . . . so what do we want to say about this? This is one of — to me — the building blocks that gets to sola Scriptura.

This is completely irrelevant to the topic, again, because Catholics fully agree with everything he said there. It does nothing whatever to prove that no infallible authorities exist other than the Bible.

At 18:33 Dr. Cooper brings up the matter of capital punishment, and implies that the Catholic Church has massively contradicted itself on this score. It hasn’t, and I’ve written about that, too. But in the time we have we can’t go off on another tangent, like our three friends do the whole time in their video. Needless to say, this false, “ugly dad” polemical claim against us won’t prove that sola Scriptura is true, either. They’re a million miles away from doing that.

At 22:47 Dr. Ortlund brings up the obligatory topics of Mary’s immaculate conception and bodily assumption (both of which Martin Luther accepted, and to his credit, Dr. Horton mentioned the former), and the papacy and papal infallibility. And how does that prove sola Scriptura? It doesn’t, of course. It’s simply an evasive technique – probably unconscious – to avoid defending one’s own position, by employing “ugly dad” examples. At this point we are more than halfway through the video and three Protestant professors and Bible experts have given us zero evidence from the Bible that it’s the only infallible authority. And – what a surprise! — they ain’t gonna do it in the rest of the tape, either.

Then they go on to another inevitable thing when critiquing the Catholic Church: attacking St. Cardinal Newman and development of doctrine, which is very far from their ostensible topic. This begins at 24:43 and goes on until 30:35. So it’s now three-quarters through the video and not a word about how Holy Scripture supposedly teaches that it only is infallible and nothing else is. These guys are non sequitur machines. That’s a fancy Latin term for arguments that are irrelevant to the topic.

Then Dr. Horton brings up faith alone at 30:58 and moves on to the invocation of saints at 31:51, up through 34:29, with Dr. Cooper joining in the fun. Anything but the topic, huh? Then they go to the canon of Scripture, which is much closer, at least (like the moon going around the earth) but still won’t prove sola Scriptura for them. That takes them to the end of the video, without – amazingly enough, given their title and statement of purpose — even remotely offering any biblical proof of sola Scriptura.

I grant that some of the topics involving Catholicism that they brought up have some bearing on the overall discussion. But my point is that they can’t simply throw mud pies at the great big barn of Catholicism and do nothing else, and call that a defense of sola Scriptura. It’s not building a positive scriptural case or providing anyone a compelling reason to believe this.

So in the end it’s a case of the emperor having no clothes. But this really shouldn’t surprise us, because in fact there is no proof to be had. Dr. Cooper himself almost admits this in a roundabout way, because he made the following statement in his video called, “A Defense of Sola Scriptura” (from 12 March 2019), from 1:39 to 2:14 on the tape:

Do we have to find a particular Scripture that says Scripture is the only authority? And I just don’t think we have to. We don’t. There’s nothing in — you can’t find — in any of Paul’s letters, for example, . . . “by the way, Scripture is the only authority and traditions are not an authority and there is no magisterium that is given some kind of infallible authority to pass on infallible teachings.” It seems like a lot of Roman Catholic apologists think that for Protestants to defend their position, that they have to find a text that says that.”

Dr. Cooper would probably go on to say that even though sola Scriptura isn’t explicitly stated, it can still be deduced or indirectly derived from various statements in Scripture. I vigorously disagree, and I continue to maintain that if indeed it can’t be found in the Bible at all, and if contrary statements are in the Bible, we must conclude that it’s self-defeating and a fatally flawed premise regarding the rule of faith.

The serious difficulties remain and are no closer to being solved than they ever have been, these past 500 years. And I submit that they never will and never can be solved, because sola Scriptura is an unbiblical point of view from the get-go.

Related Books

100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura (May 2012 / second revised edition: Aug. 2025)

Pillars of Sola Scriptura: Replies to Whitaker, Goode, & Biblical “Proofs” for “Bible Alone” (Sep. 2012)

Related Article

Sola Scriptura is Self-Defeating and False if Not in the Bible (vs. Kevin Johnson) [5-4-04]

Related Web Page

Bible, Tradition, Canon, & “Sola Scriptura”

***

Practical Matters: I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become a Catholic or to return to the Catholic Church, or better understand some doctrines and why Catholics believe them. If you believe my full-time apostolate is worth supporting, please seriously consider a much-needed monthly or one-time financial contribution. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV).

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle and 100% tax-deductible donations if desired), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information.

You can support my work a great deal in non-financial ways, if you prefer; by subscribing to, commenting on, liking, and sharing videos from my two YouTube channels, Catholic Bible Highlights and Lux Veritatis, in partnership with Kenny Burchard (see my own videos), and/or by signing up to receive notice for new articles on this blog. Just type your email address on the sidebar to the right (scroll down quite a bit), where you see, “Sign Me Up!” Thanks a million!

***

Summary: Semi-humorous review of a video where three Protestant professors supposedly defend sola Scriptura. In fact, they evaded it the entire time and lobbed relentless non sequiturs.

Previous Post

January 2, 2026

Biblical Answers to Three Protestant "Mary Mistakes"

Next Post

January 6, 2026 Perfectly Keeping the Law: Top Ten Bible Proofs

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz