Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Bible vs. Denominations, Contra Gavin Ortlund

Bible vs. Denominations, Contra Gavin Ortlund

Last updated on: June 13, 2026 at 1:08 pm by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Bible vs. Denominations, Contra Gavin Ortlund 2026-06-13T13:08:17-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a transcript of the video, Gavin Ortlund vs. Catholic Unity: Are Denominations Biblical? [Catholic Bible Highlights, 54 minutes, 10-23-25], minus the discussion portion.

*****

Dr. Gavin Ortlund, a Reformed Baptist apologist, runs the very popular YouTube channel Truth Unites (143,000 subscribers and 551 videos). Today we’re responding to the central claims made in his video, “Which Denomination Should You Choose?” (3-17-23). I will highlight a lot of related data from the New Testament and wonder out loud how Protestants interpret and apply them. What is the biblical doctrine of the Church? We need to have this important dialogue with our Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ, because the Bible views it as of the utmost importance.

Gavin’s opening statement is the following:

[Denominations] One of the questions I get very frequently is, “suppose I’m convinced of Protestantism; which particular denomination should I choose and how do I know in which particular local church?”

If we seek biblical truth, we want all of it that we can get, but since Protestant denominations contradict each other in literally hundreds of ways, it necessarily follows that someone is wrong in those instances and that these different groups of Protestants represent different degrees of biblical truth. Protestantism isn’t one unified whole, but rather, an amalgam of contradictory systems, that have no way of unifying, because of how they have defined authority and the seeking of biblical truth.

Of course, there is a great deal of common ground among Protestants, too, but what they have in common tends to be also what Protestants have in common with Catholics and Orthodox: things that all Christians agree with*.* The fact remains that they still massively contradict one another. I submit that this is not a desirable state of affairs; nor is it biblical.

Gavin continues, 24 seconds into his video:

[Denominations] [The] first [thing] is to realize that the stakes are not as high in choosing between two Protestant traditions, because the Protestant traditions recognize [that] the church does not begin and end with them. We’re not saying we’re the one true church, so if you make the wrong decision, . . . let’s say you become Anglican and you should have been Presbyterian, or you become Presbyterian and you should have been Methodist or something like this, the difference will not be that you’re not in the one true Church.

This brings us right to the heart of the matter. The problem with this is that the Bible doesn’t ever claim that all this error can be present among Christians, and that it’s fine and dandy and of no concern at all. The phrase, “the truth” appears in the New Testament 70 times. It’s presupposing that “the truth” is out there and can be identified. It never asserts that everyone must somehow grasp after the highest degree of truth they can find (in their subjective, fallible judgment) in one given Protestant assembly among several hundred.

St. Paul refers to “one faith” (Eph 4:5, RSV). Jesus prayed three times during the Last Supper that Christians “may be one” (Jn 17:11, 21-22). And what did He mean by that? Would it include massive doctrinal disagreements, as we find in Protestantism? It seems not, since Jesus defines this oneness as being “one, even as we are one” (Jn 17:11, 22) and “one; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee” (Jn 17:21) and “perfectly one” (Jn 17:23). This is the oneness and unity between God the Father and God the Son. Do they ever disagree with each other? No; never.

It seems to me that Gavin and Protestantism as a whole deny that doctrinal and moral unity is supremely important. They have given up on seeking it. I vigorously submit that the New Testament assumes or presupposes “the one true Church” as a discernible, objective fact. Protestants today almost always assume that the search for the one Church is impossible; it can’t be found. This matter is so unimportant to them that Gavin flat-out states, “We’re not saying we’re the one true church”. This is what I have called in my writings, “The Protestant ‘Non-Quest’ for Certainty”.

This isn’t, by the way, how the first Protestants expressed things. Luther and Calvin and other early leaders in the Protestant Revolt believed in “the one Church.” But as they continued to endlessly split into endless competing groups as time went on, and moved further away from “classic Reformation Protestantism,” as it is called, most of them forgot about that and stopped taking about it.

Gavin’s statement is a classic example. According to him, in effect, whatever Protestant group you end up with ain’t the “one true church” anyway, so don’t sweat it! The stakes are low, rather than very high. Subjective opinion or even comfort seems to be more important than truth itself. They would never put it that way, but I think that’s what it inevitably comes down to, once one seriously reflects upon what a sort of “agnostic” claim like this implies.

The New Testament takes a very different view. If we look up the phrase “the church” we find that it occurs 91 times. Most of these refer to a local congregation; we also find the term, “churches” (e.g., Acts 15:41; Rom 16:4 and 33 other times). But in 21 passages, it refers to the one true Church (Mt 16:18; Acts 5:11; 20:28; 1 Cor 10:32; 11:22; 12:28; 15:9; Eph1:22-23; 3:10, 21; 5:23-25, 27, 29, 32; Phil 3:6; Col 1:18, 24; 1 Tim 3:15).

In other words, again, the “one faith” referred to in Ephesians 4:5 is assumed in the New Testament to be a unified body of doctrine or “apostolic deposit” that can be identified. The Jerusalem Council in Acts 15, accordingly, made a decree, led by St. Peter and St. James, and by the Holy Spirit (hence, infallible), that applied to the entire Church (very much like later ecumenical councils). Hence, the Apostle Paul in Acts 16:4 proclaimed the decree as binding to local churches all through Asia Minor (present-day Turkey).

Why, then, would anyone want to join one mere denomination, which is not even claiming to be the one true Church that Jesus Himself set up (that’s in Matthew 16:18)? And how can this one true Church be described by Paul as “the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15) if all it is, is a self-contradictory confusing mess of hundreds of individual denominations? When two denominations contradict on some point of theology, both can’t be right. At least one is necessarily wrong, and both may be wrong. Error and falsehood is present, in any event, and that can’t possibly be good, according to the Bible. It’s the devil, after all, whom Jesus described as “the father of lies” (Jn 8:44).

We Catholics contend, following the Bible’s clear and repeated teaching, that there is one Church only, with one truth and one unified apostolic tradition. We must then determine how to find it in today’s world, and that’s a separate argument from history, that I make in many articles and books. The Bible repeatedly forbids divisions of any kind among Christians.

Our Lord Jesus viewed His Church as being “one flock” (Jn. 10:16). St. Luke described the earliest Christians as being “of one heart and soul” (Acts 4:32). Luke 2:42 casually refers to “the apostles’ teaching” without any hint that there were competing interpretations of it. St. Peter warned about “false teachers” among Christians, who would “secretly bring in destructive heresies,” which go against “the way of truth” (2 Pet. 2:1-2).

St. Paul, above all, repeatedly condemns “dissensions” (Rom 16:17), “quarreling” (1 Cor 1:11), “jealousy and strife” (1 Cor 3:3), “divisions” and “factions” (1 Cor 11:18-19), “discord” (1 Cor 12:25), “enmity” and “party spirit” (Gal 5:20), and calls for Christians to be “united in the same mind and the same judgment” (1 Cor 1:10; cf. Phil 2:2).

Paul condemns party affiliations associated with persons and asks, “Is Christ divided?” (1 Cor 1:13; cf. 3:4-7) and regards Christian tradition as of one piece; not an amalgam of permissible competing theories: “the tradition that you received from us” (2 Thess 3:6); “the truth which has been entrusted to you by the Holy Spirit” (2 Tim 1:14); “the doctrine which you have been taught” (Rom 16:17); “being in full accord and of one mind” (Phil 2:2); “stand firm in one spirit, with one mind striving side by side for the faith of the gospel” (Phil 1:27).

He, like Jesus, ties doctrinal unity together with the one God: “maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit, . . . one Lord, one faith, one baptism, . . .” (Eph 4:3-5). His strong and certain teaching on this topic is well summed up in the following two passages:

1 Timothy 6:3-5 If any one teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching which accords with godliness, he is puffed up with conceit, he knows nothing; he has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions, and wrangling among men who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.

Titus 3:9-11 But avoid stupid controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels over the law, for they are unprofitable and futile. As for a man who is factious, after admonishing him once or twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is perverted and sinful; he is self-condemned.

What does a Protestant do with all of this biblical data? We’ll, they reply — I used to argue this myself in my Protestant days –, that they have a broad doctrinal unity on the most important doctrines (this is true, for the most part), but allow differences on what they call “secondary doctrines”. But that concept cannot be found in the New Testament.

In Matthew 28:19, Jesus urged us to “observe all” that He commanded us. He didn’t separate that into two groups, with one being open to all sorts of disagreements. I collected in one of my books, Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths, 295 Bible passages about the biblical categories of “the faith” and “the truth” and “the doctrine” and “teaching” and “the message”. These are all presented as synonymous.

Well-known Protestant theologian H. Richard Niebuhr (1894-1962) wrote:

Denominationalism thus represents the moral failure of Christianity. And unless the ethics of brotherhood can gain the victory over this divisiveness within the body of Christ it is useless to expect it to be victorious in the world. But before the church can hope to overcome its fatal division it must learn to recognize and to acknowledge the secular character of its denominationalism. (The Social Sources of Denominationalism, New York: The World Publishing Co. / Meridian Books, 1957; originally 1929, 25)

This is arguably far more critical than anything we have said above. Protestants have to grapple with this matter of sectarianism: a thing extraordinarily difficult if not impossible to defend from biblical teaching. I freely admitted this when I was a Protestant, too, by the way. I thought it was scandalous and that it made evangelism very difficult to undertake, seeing that Christians disagreed about so much.

I didn’t have a definitive “answer” to that (other than that sin brought about seemingly unsolvable division). How I resolved the difficulty in the long run was to accept that the Catholic point of view made a lot more biblical and historical sense: that it tied everything together in a way that no form of Protestantism could or ever would.

Related Books

Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths (Aug. 2009, 445 pages)

Protestantism: Critical Reflections of an Ecumenical Catholic (May 2003, 188 pages)

Related Web Page

Calvinism & General Protestantism: Catholic Critique

Sections:

Protestantism (General)

XIV. THE PROTESTANT “QUEST FOR UNCERTAINTY” / THE SO-CALLED CATHOLIC “PROBLEM” OF THE “INFALLIBILITY REGRESS”

XV. PROTESTANTISM: LOGICALLY SELF-DEFEATING / REDUCTION TO SELF-CONTRADICTION

XVI. DENOMINATIONALISM AND SECTARIANISM

***

Practical Matters: I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become a Catholic or to return to the Catholic Church, or better understand some doctrines and why Catholics believe them. If you believe my full-time apostolate is worth supporting, please seriously consider a much-needed monthly or one-time financial contribution. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV).

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle and 100% tax-deductible donations if desired), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information.

You can support my work a great deal in non-financial ways, if you prefer; by subscribing to, commenting on, liking, and sharing videos from my two YouTube channels, Catholic Bible Highlights and Lux Veritatis, in partnership with Kenny Burchard (see my own videos), and/or by signing up to receive notice for new articles on this blog. Just type your email address on the sidebar to the right (scroll down quite a bit), where you see, “Sign Me Up!” Thanks a million!

***

Summary: Searing biblical examination of the scandalous outlook of denominationalism, over against the one true Church, one faith, “the truth” and apostolic tradition and succession.

Calvinism & General Protestantism

Previous Post

November 30, 2025

Defense of my "Top 5 Un-Protestant Bible Verses"

Next Post

December 3, 2025 C. S. Lewis: More Evidences of Anti-Catholic Prejudice

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz