Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Luther: Execute Frigid Wives; Torture & Burn Witches

Luther: Execute Frigid Wives; Torture & Burn Witches

Last updated on: April 7, 2025 at 1:47 am by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Luther: Execute Frigid Wives; Torture & Burn Witches 2025-04-07T01:47:33-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Including Two Examples of Luther’s Espousal of Capital Punishment for Wrong or Aberrant Behavior Prior to 1530

Photo credit: witch burning [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

It’s commonly thought by students of 16th-century Christianity (who have an adequate knowledge of the historical facts) that Martin Luther advocated tolerance towards belief-systems and behaviors contrary to what he thought was Christian, and prior to 1530 (i.e., in the first twelve years or so of his proclaimed “reformation”); thus was opposed to persecution up to and including execution on these grounds.

Many other Protestants are under the illusion that Luther was always tolerant and never advocated persecution for religious beliefs different than his own. I’ve talked to, for example, at least one wife of a Lutheran pastor who thought this. The myth of the tolerant Luther dies hard in many folks. One can only present the documented facts. You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink. I’ve written about it several times:

Luther Favored Death Penalty for Anabaptists [2-24-04]

Luther’s Attitudes on Religious Liberty (Roland H. Bainton) [2-16-06]

Luther: Death Penalty for Anabaptists & 1525 Peasants’ Revolt (Critique of James Swan’s Misrepresentation on the Radio Show, Iron Sharpens Iron, with Chris Arnzen) [11-6-07]

Luther on the Deaths of Zwingli, St. Thomas More, & St. John Fisher [11-30-07; expanded on 10-31-17]

Reply to Reformed Luther Apologist James Swan’s Request for Documentation of Executions of Anabaptists Sanctioned by Luther, in the 1530s [8-17-14]

Luther Favored Death, Not Religious Freedom, For ‘Heretics’ [National Catholic Register, 10-25-17]

Protestants Executed Peaceful Anabaptists (vs. L. Banzoli) [6-20-22]

Luther Favored Execution of Heretics (vs. Jordan Cooper) + Good & Bad Protestant & Catholic Apologetics & Historical Revisionism & “Twisting” [3-21-24]

James Swan Rationalizes Luther’s Intolerance Again [11-22-24]

I’d like to specifically discuss in this article “early” and “weird” examples of Luther’s views in this regard. As early as 1522, he had written:

[p. 32] You may ask: What is to become of the other [the guilty party] if he too is perhaps unable to lead a chaste life? Answer: It was for this reason that God commanded in the law [Deut. 22:22-24] that adulterers be stoned, that they might not have to face this question. The temporal sword and government should therefore still put adulterers to death. . . . Where the government is negligent and lax, however, and fails to inflict the death penalty, the adulterer may betake himself to a far country and there remarry if he is unable to remain continent. But it would be better to put him to death, lest a bad example be set . . .

The blame rests with the government. [p. 33] Why do they not put adulterers to death? Then I would not need to give such advice. Between two evils one is always the lesser, in this case allowing the adulterer to remarry in a distant land in order to avoid fornication. . . .

Where the government fails to inflict the death penalty and the one spouse wishes to retain the other, the guilty one should still in Christian fashion be publicly rebuked and caused to make amends according to the gospel . . .

[p. 34] Here you should be guided by the words of St. Paul, I Corinthians 7 [:4–5], “The husband does not rule over his own body, but the wife does; likewise the wife does not rule over her own body, but the husband does. Do not deprive each other, except by agreement,” etc. Notice that St. Paul forbids either party to deprive the other, for by the marriage vow each submits his body to the other in conjugal duty. When one resists the other and refuses the conjugal duty she is robbing the other of the body she had bestowed upon him. This is really contrary to marriage, and dissolves the marriage. For this reason the civil government must compel the wife, or put her to death. If the government fails to act, the husband must reason that his wife has been stolen away and slain by robbers; he must seek another. We would certainly have to accept it if someone’s life were taken from him. Why then should we not also accept it if a wife steals herself away from her husband, or is stolen away by others? (The Estate of Marriage, 1522, translated by Walther I. Brandt, from Luther’s Works, Vol. 45, pp. 32-34)

This is marvelous reform of the morals concerning sexuality that the Catholic Church had cultivated for 1500 years, isn’t it? The state puts adulterers to death. Frigid women should also be done away with by the state. If the state doesn’t execute adulterers, they ought to run away to another country and get remarried (!!!).

Luther doesn’t say whether an impotent man should likewise be put away by the wife or put to death by authorities (the “ED police”?). I suspect he would not take such a position. No, only women who aren’t fulfilling their sexual duties (men always do, no doubt) are subjected to such drastic measures, and the adulterous man can flee to another country, where Luther in his wisdom recommends another “marriage” as the “lesser” of “two evils.” We can see how the “Reformation” truly liberated women from Catholic chauvinistic medieval serfdom, can’t we?

Self-proclaimed expert on Luther and Reformed Protestant apologist and polemicist James Swan, aka Tertiumquid (see his lengthy section on my Anti-Catholicism page). blissfully unaware of the above, nevertheless makes one of his sweeping and historically ignorant whoppers in a comment on the anti-Catholic CARM forum, on 2-11-25:

Linking Luther to intolerance and capital punishment in 1523 does not comport with Luther scholarship. At this period in his career, it’s highly unlikely he advocated executing heretics. (comment #96 in the thread, “Is burning heretics against the will of the Holy Spirit?”: p. 5)

With more nuance, Swan wrote on his blog, Boors All, on 8-13-15:

Luther did support a broader concept of religious freedom previous to 1530. He then saw public blasphemy and sedition as two offenses that should be reprimanded. The death penalty may be invoked in certain instances.

In 1526, Luther preached that female sorcerers should be put to death (not sure if he thought the same about male sorcerers):

Concerning the female sorcerer. . . . Why does the law name women more than men here, even though men are also guilty of this? Because women are more susceptible to those superstitions of Satan; take Eve, for example. They are commonly called “wise women.” Let them be killed. (Sermon on Exodus 22:18: “You shall not permit a female sorcerer to live,” 1526, WA [Weimar collection of Luther’s writings] XVI, p. 551; in Susan C. Karant-Nunn & Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks [editors and translators], Luther on Women: a Sourcebook, Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 231)

In 1538, Luther advocated the burning of witches:

On that day (August 20, 1538), [Georg] Spalatin [good friend of Luther’s] related the tale of a witch’s insolence, and how a girl at Altenburg shed tears of blood whenever the woman was present, for, even if she did not see her nor know of her, yet she felt her presence and shed tears. Luther answered: “One should hasten to put such witches to death. The jurists wish to have too many witnesses, despising these plain signs. Recently I had to deal with a matrimonial case, where the wife wished to poison her husband, so that he vomited lizards. When she was examined by torture she answered nothing, because such witches are dumb; they despise punishment and the devil does not let them speak. These facts show plainly enough that an example should be made of them to terrify others.”

On August 25 (1538), they spoke much of witches who stole eggs from hens and milk and butter. Luther said: “No mercy is to be shown them. I myself would begin to burn them according to the law that the priests should begin to stone culprits.” (Conversations With Luther: Selections from Recently Published Sources of the Table Talk, translated and edited by Preserved Smith and Herbert Percival Gallinger, New York: The Pilgrim Press, 1915, pp. 163-164)

Smith and Gallinger commented in a footnote to this on page 164:

Such sayings as these fanned the flames of the horrible persecution of witches by which hundreds of thousands of harmless persons lost their lives in the sixteenth century. Four witches were executed at Wittenberg in 1540.

This is a trustworthy portion of the Table Talk, according to the scholarly criteria which I presented at some length in my article, “Luther’s ‘Table Talk’: How Historically Accurate Is It?” (4-7-25). Preserved Smith (1880-1941) was an American historian of the Protestant “Reformation”: whose doctoral dissertation at Columbia University (1907) was a critical study of the Table Talk. Since he included the above excerpts in his book, he deemed them to be “original records” which “in recent years has for the first time offered a really good text . . . new material of first importance” (Conversations . . . Introduction, pp. xxv-xxvi)

Alas, the editors of Luther’s Works (55 volumes in English) chose not to include this entry (perhaps readers can guess why). The entirety of Volume 54 (published in 1967: 52 years after Smith’s book) is devoted to a chronological compilation of Luther’s recorded utterances in the Table Talk (as best as can be determined). But it includes entries from August 19th and 22nd, 1538 (pp. 300-304) and on August 25th, but on a different topic (p. 305).

Luther lived in Wittenberg and died there in 1546. So it’s quite possible if not plausible that he approved of these particular burnings. An article from the website Alaturka.info entitled, “Martin Luther – Reformation movement and witch burning” (7-29-18) commented on seemingly the same incident. I don’t know how accurate it is, but for what it’s worth:

Prista Frühbottin was arrested by the electoral bailiff, because she was accused of having poisoned the cattle in the pasture with the help of her son and two farmhands. In truth, a drought had killed the cattle. However, after the trial and torture, the defendants were tied to oak piles in the marketplace on June 29, 1540, and were burned alive by the fire below them.

The artist and eyewitness, Lucas Cranach the Younger, made a woodcut of the pyre [see a photo of it]. The Wittenberg executioner Magnus Fischer was also suspected of having been in close contact with Prista Frühbottin. He as well was seized and sentenced to death by burning, executed in Eisleben on July 7, 1540. In Wittenberg at least 21 people from 1540 to 1674 were affected by witch-hunts: eight executions [were] witnessed, of 13 other procedures the output is not known. In connection with the trial of Prista Frühbottin, it is said in the documents handed down that many others have been arrested and convicted.

In another Table Talk excerpt from the period 1538-1540, drawn from the Weimar edition, deemed to be quite trustworthy by the editors of Luther’s Works (Vol. 54, Introduction), Luther advocated the torturing (and execution?) of witches, thus echoing the worst excesses and sins of Catholic inquisitorial tactics which are endlessly decried by Protestant apologists and polemicists (even actual historians), with the constant implication that Luther and Protestants supposedly rose above all that.

I agree with the condemnations of such practices (unlike Luther, I have never advocated them for heresies and false beliefs, and am also opposed to capital punishment, period), but disagree with the Massive Lie that only Catholics believed and engaged in them in past eras. Luther stated (i.e., was recorded to have stated):

Out of special hatred for our faith, the devil has sent some whores here to destroy our poor young men . . . such a syphilitic whore can poison ten, twenty, thirty or more of the children of good people, and thus is to be considered a murderer, or worse, as a poisoner. . . .

And I must speak plainly. If I were a judge, I would have such a poisonous, syphilitic whore tortured by being broken on the wheel and having her veins lacerated, for it is not to be denied what damage such a filthy whore does to young blood, so that it is unspeakably damaged before it is even fully grown and destroyed in the blood. (Table-Talk, WA, TR, IV, no. 4857, pp. 552-554; cited in Susan C. Karant-Nunn & Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks, ibid., pp. 157-158)

Luther’s Works again chose to omit this entry, even though it is from impeccable sources, according to its own discussion of Table Talk in the Introduction to Volume 54. The chronological listing of excepts originally numbered in the Weimar German edition jumps from #4716 (p. 363) to #4875 (p. 369). One must really “dig” to find Luther statements like these.

But they may be available in Luther’s Works in due course, because it’s being expanded from the initial 55 volumes, with many more volumes to be added. So far, 82 volumes have been published or planned, but looking over their titles, I see no “Table Talk Part II” among them. So unless one knows German, “shocking” and “inquisitorial”-like statements like the one above have to be found in articles such as this one, or the books from which I draw them.

They’re not likely to ever be heard from Lutheran or other Protestant pulpits on Sunday: that‘s for sure!

*
***
*

Practical Matters: I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them. If you believe my full-time apostolate is worth supporting, please seriously consider a much-needed monthly or one-time financial contribution. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV).

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle and 100% tax-deductible donations if desired), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information.

You can support my work a great deal in non-financial ways, if you prefer; by subscribing to, commenting on, liking, and sharing videos from my YouTube channel, Catholic Bible Highlights, where I partner with Kenny Burchard (see my own videos), and/or by signing up to receive notice for new articles on this blog. Just type your email address on the sidebar to the right (scroll down quite a bit), where you see, “Sign Me Up!” Thanks a million!

***

Photo credit: witches being burned in Nuremburg (from 1525 a Protestant town) in 1555 [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

Summary: I document that Luther advocated execution for adulterers & frigid wives in 1522, for sorcerers in 1526, burning of witches in 1538, & torturing prostitutes in 1538-1540.

Anti-Catholicism

Martin Luther

Protestant Persecution & Intolerance

Luther & execution for heresy

Luther & execution of frigid women

Luther & execution of witches

Luther & torture of witches

Luther's intolerance

Reformation persecution and intolerance

Previous Post

April 7, 2025

Luther's "Table Talk": How Historically Accurate Is It?

Next Post

April 14, 2025 Justification in the Book of James (Different from Paul?)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz