Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
The James White St. Ignatius of Antioch Controversy

The James White St. Ignatius of Antioch Controversy

Last updated on: June 13, 2026 at 1:04 pm by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

The James White St. Ignatius of Antioch Controversy 2026-06-13T13:04:34-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Yes, Virginia, There Was a St. Ignatius of Antioch”

Photo credit: My own self-published book with self-designed cover (2nd revised edition, 2013)

This came about after his recent debate with Joe Heschmeyer regarding whether the Catholic Mass is propitiatory. During one of the cross-examination periods, Bishop “Dr.” [???] James White (see my large web page devoted to him and also my long 2013 book, Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the “Undefeatable” Anti-Catholic Champion) mentioned in passing that in contemporary scholarship, there is a movement that denies the historical existence of St. Ignatius of Antioch (d. c. 110).

NOTE: This view was not espoused by White; he merely mentioned that it is out there. Several folks have unfortunately distorted what he said [example one / example two]. I watched the entire debate. I believe, by the way, that it’s the only one of his oral debates that I’ve ever watched in its entirety, because his relentless sophistry drives me up the wall and I just don’t have the patience for it. I’ve been on the receiving end of it many times, believe me. I was “saved” by Joe’s superb performance. White stated at 1:48:56 in the transcript:

. . . if we have what Ignatius wrote Since I was [in] the seminary — and I’m not sure if you’re aware of this — over the past 25 years there has been a tremendous amount of scholarly skepticism expressed as to whether Ignatius even existed and which letters are actually [authentic] . . . it’s becoming the central view. I hope Ignatius existed and wrote the things we have . . . he may have written in 107-108. I hope he did but but maybe not, but what he’s addressing what’s very important whenever it was written, some people are saying it was 150 something like that.

White wrote on his blog on 3 March 2025, in an introduction to a Dividing Line episode devoted to the controversy:

I felt it was absolutely necessary to address the amazingly dishonest attacks that have been launched against me about a single cross-examination question from Saturday night’s debate. So we did a full dive into Ignatius, his writings, the issues with the transmission of those writings, forgeries, you name it, and then walked through the actual text cited in the debate demonstrating that the actual answer I gave was fully substantiated by the text itself. It is my hope that those who are planning to continue this campaign of misrepresentation will listen to this presentation, realize the foolishness of such an action, repent of their intentions, and cease and desist with their activities. That is up to them. (see also a post-debate clarification that White made on Twitter / X about his position regarding St. Ignatius).

Having defended the good bishop in this respect, I do, however, think it’s beyond strange and odd that he would even bring up such a thing during the debate. But having followed his antics and refuted him for now literally 30 years as of this very month, it doesn’t surprise me. A cynic might possibly opine — and perhaps accurately — that this was an obfuscatory tactic.

Moreover, White in a video today stated that Joe apologized to him for having stated in his closing statement that he denied St. Ignatius” existence. But Joe disputes this in a Facebook comment from 3-6-25: “When he says that I admitted to misrepresenting him and apologized for it, that’s just not true. Obviously. He’s not covering himself in glory here.” In fact, Joe had only asserted that “by the way, he did exist; he did write. We have his writings.” He never claimed that White himself denied his existence.

Now I’d like to cite someone who is an expert on St. Ignatius: Michael W. Holmes, the former Chair of the Department of Biblical and Theological Studies at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received an MA in New Testament from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (1976), and a PhD from Princeton Theological Seminary (1984). He did his PhD work under Bruce Metzger, who was widely considered to be one of the most influential New Testament scholars of the 20th century. Holmes’ primary research areas are in New Testament textual criticism and the Apostolic Fathers.

He was previously on the faculty at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School and Princeton Theological Seminary, and has been visiting scholar at Luther Theological Seminary in St. Paul. He holds membership in the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas, the Society of Biblical Literature, the Institute for Biblical Research, and the North American Patristics Society. I will be citing his book, The Apostolic Fathers in English (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 3rd edition, 2006). I have had the second edition from 1989 in my library for a long time, and read it in November 1994. Holmes writes in his introduction to St. Ignatius:

Everything said about Ignatius thus far rests upon the conclusion that the seven letters of the so-called middle recension are authentic. This conclusion is widely held today . . . The middle recension, which was known to Eusebius, preserves the original form of the letters. (p. 90)

Catholic scholars [in the 16th-17th centuries] generally defended the authenticity of the letters because of the obvious polemical value of Ignatius’s early emphasis on the monepiscopal form of church structure, while Protestants generally denied their authenticity for similar reasons.

A consensus of sorts in favor of the middle recension came to prevail following the publication of Pearson’s Vindiciae Ignatianae (1672), but . . . Not until the independent work of Theodor Zahn (1873), Adolf von Harnack (1878), and J. BV. Lightfoot (1885) was the authenticity of the seven letters of the middle recension generally recognized. So thorough and persuasive was the work especially of Zahn and Lightfoot that the great majority of scholars since their day have considered the matter of authenticity settled once and for all.

Three major challenges in the space of a decade in the late 1960s and 1970s — by Weijenborg and Joly, who questioned the authenticity of the entire corpus, and by Rius-Camps, who contended that three of the seven letters were forged and the rest interpolated and revised — did little to alter the consensus. The admitted difficulties that were noted and raised as a reason for reevaluating the documents were not new, and the proposed solutions seemed to raise more problems than they solved. (p. 91)

In the late 90s the question of authenticity was again raised. . . . scholars such as R. Hubner and T. Lechner claim that the letters betray a dependence upon the writings of Noetus of Smyrna and therefore must be forgeries composed no earlier than about AD 165-175 . . . their case for seeing them as later forgeries is unpersuasive . . . The traditional view, that the seven letters attributed to Ignatius are authentic, remains the most probable (and least problematic) solution to the question regarding authenticity. (pp. 91-92)

Ignatius of Antioch (d. c. 117) vs. Sola Scriptura [12-21-21]

St. Ignatius & Eucharistic Real Presence (vs. Lucas Banzoli) [9-12-22]

St. Ignatius, Bishops, & the Rule of Faith (vs. T.F. Kauffman) [7-14-23]

Ignatius Of Antioch On Monarchical Bishops [1-25-24]

Reply to Gavin Ortlund: St. Ignatius & Bishops (+ St. Polycarp and St. Clement of Rome On Early Church Ecclesiology) [2-1-24]

Revelation 2-3: Monarchical Bishops By 95 AD [2-2-24]

Church Fathers & Sola Fide (vs. Jordan Cooper) Incl. St. Ignatius of Antioch vs. Faith Alone; Epistle to Diognetus; Council of Trent on Justification by Faith & Imputation; Anti-Catholicism in the Lutheran Confessions [3-6-24]

Faith Alone & Earliest Fathers (vs. Scholastic Lutherans) — Including Clement of Rome (d. c. 101), Ignatius of Antioch (50-c. 110), and the Epistle of Mathetes to Diognetus (bet. 130-190) [11-10-24]

*
***
*

Practical Matters: I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them. If you believe my full-time apostolate is worth supporting, please seriously consider a much-needed monthly or one-time financial contribution. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV).

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle and 100% tax-deductible donations if desired), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information.

You can support my work a great deal in non-financial ways, if you prefer; by subscribing to, commenting on, liking, and sharing videos from my YouTube channel, Catholic Bible Highlights, where I partner with Kenny Burchard (see my own videos), and/or by signing up to receive notice for new articles on this blog. Just type your email address on the sidebar to the right (scroll down quite a bit), where you see, “Sign Me Up!” Thanks a million!

***

My own self-published book with self-designed cover (2nd revised edition, 2013)

[see book and purchase information]

Summary: Reformed Baptist anti-Catholic apologist James White is falsely accused of denying St. Ignatius’ existence, but it was still silly of him to mention skeptical historians in a debate.

Fathers of the Church

James White

apostolic fathers

early church fathers

historical skepticism

James White

James White & Ignatius of Antioch

St. Ignatius of Antioch

Previous Post

March 6, 2025

The Sacrifice of the Mass in Hebrews & Revelation

Next Post

March 11, 2025 Infallible Church Authority (vs. Anglican Stearns #1)

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And obeisance doesn't mean "worship". It means "respect", "obey", or "submission". Very weird that you ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"Many of these scriptures you have noted have been taken out of context. With Daniel, ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Protestants often point out that Jesus is now triumphant in heaven and object to Catholics ..."

Anthony

Three More Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz