Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
“Romanist”: Dialogue with a Protestant

“Romanist”: Dialogue with a Protestant

Last updated on: June 13, 2026 at 1:04 pm by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

“Romanist”: Dialogue with a Protestant 2026-06-13T13:04:16-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo credit: book cover from the Amazon page for the title, Romanism: The Relentless Roman Catholic Assault on the Gospel of Jesus Christ! (Robert M. Zins, White Horse Pubns; 2nd edition (January 1, 1995).

His words are in blockquotes below, time-stamped to the video, so you can find each one.

*****

I’ve noticed this among Romanists since my early teenage years. . . .

Are you a Genevist or a Wittenberger or Henry VIIIist?

Hello there, I haven’t heard those designations before though I can get their gists by “Genevist” you mean “Calvinist”, “Wittenberger” a Lutheran, “Henry VIIIist” an Anglican but I’m neither. These institutions however insist to rather call them according to their preferred names. As for me, I am a Trinitarian Pentecostal but like them we consider ourselves Catholics. Thank you for your patience and God bless.

So I call you a Trinitarian Pentecostal, but you — for some inexplicable reason — refuse to call us by our preferred name.

To call me a Trinitarian Pentecostal is just another way to call the kind of Pentecostal I’m in but we go by other names too. I do see the point you’re making here and I know the preferred name is “Roman Catholic” but unlike the words “Genevist”, “Wittenberger”, and “Henry VIIIist”, the word “Romanist” has historical basis. However, that doesn’t mean it’s the only one I use, I also use “RC” or just “Catholic”. So obviously, I don’t make it a dogma to use “Romanist” exclusively. In fact when I refer to the Roman Catholic Church, to shorten things, I do use the “Roman Church” at times. To be fair, the word “Protestant” was not proposed by the Reformers, Luther rather preferred either “Christian” or “Evangelical” while Calvin did not approve of “Calvinist”. They both saw their names unfit. Moreover, The name “Reformed Catholic” is preferred among Reformed and Anglican churches.

Most of us prefer “Catholic” since there are many Catholics (i.e., who believe there is a pope, etc.) who are not Roman rite. The Catechism of the Catholic Church never uses “Roman Catholic” at all. That title was originally a pejorative used by the early Anglicans, who wanted to be Catholic without the pope. So they called themselves “Catholic” and called us “Roman Catholic.” “Roman Catholic” is not necessarily pejorative today, but “Romanist” — like “papist” — certainly is, and no serious scholar would ever use it.

***

“Please Hit ‘Subscribe’”! If you have received benefit from this or any of my other 5,000+ articles, please follow my blog by signing up (with your email address) on the sidebar to the right (you may have to scroll down a bit), above where there is an icon bar, “Sign Me Up!”: to receive notice when I post a new blog article. This is the equivalent of subscribing to a YouTube channel. My blog was rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT: endorsed by influential Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Actually, I partner with Kenny Burchard on the YouTube channel, Catholic Bible Highlights. Please subscribe there, too! Please also consider following me on Twitter / X and purchasing one or more of my 55 books. All of this helps me get more exposure, and (however little!) more income for my full-time apologetics work. Thanks so much and happy reading!

***

Thank you for that response. I’ve heard of that from a Roman Catholic somewhere about it originating from Anglicans and he too didn’t take that lightly. Here in my country (a Catholic majority), though they use “Catholic”, they do not bear any animosity to being called one at all. In fact the full name of the Roman Church in Latin is “Ecclesia Catholica Apostolica Romana” if I’m not mistaken in 1875, so it eventually grew to be an accepted term and many of my people use it in their birth certificates. Now, I’m still fine with using Romanist since unlike the words you typed in, it has a historical basis. Just as we let you call us “Protestants” despite the fact that this wasn’t even proposed by the Reformers but over time got stuck. The preferred names in the Protestant world are: a.) Evangelical, Christian (by Martin Luther, Evangelical Catholic (Lutheran) b.) Reformed (by John Calvin), Reformed Catholic (Calvinist and Anglican). (c.) Christian Catholic (Pentecostal, at least for us here, one of our designations). I do recall one time, I coined the term “Crossers” for Roman Catholics but I grew weary of the word and just stick to Roman Catholic, RC, Catholic and Romanist.

“Protestant” is not objectionable among the vast majority of Protestants (hence I use it and am happy to use subtitles like “Reformed” etc., too), in the way that “Romanist” is objectionable to almost all Catholics. So it becomes a question of extending the courtesy of calling folks what they want to be called, which is basic ethics and human relations.

Aye, that’s because most folks do not know that the word was not proposed by the Reformers so they do not find it objectionable. Some who do, tend to mention it just so people in their congregations can be reminded that it was never always the case. Nevertheless, as I’ve said it before, I don’t always use the word “Romanist”. It’s not a dogma for us to use it always because evidently there are other words to choose from. At least RC’s like Mr. Joe Heschmeyer has learnt to use “Popery”(another derogatory term) even if it’s only part of his channel’s title. I can admire him for that. Just like me when people called me “Kimpang” a word in our language which means “cripple” (that’s because I am, though it was derogatory, well, even today), I used to be deeply hurt and cry but over time I got to live with it. I’d even learn to use it for a laugh before people could use it against me. Anyway, the whole point of the word “Romanist” is to highlight the differences between Protestant and Catholic beliefs.

You should use “Roman Catholic” then, if you can’t bring yourself to call folks like me “Catholics.” I already agreed that that isn’t a pejorative like “Romanist” and “papist.” It’s not about personal hurt; it’s about a standard ethical precept of calling people by their own preferred titles: not what someone else chooses for them. Rev. Jordan Cooper, e.g., uses “Roman Catholic” on his channel, probably — I would guess — because, as an academic, he knows that nobody in the world of scholarship uses “Romanist” and that it’s a pejorative. He’s a Lutheran and I call him a Lutheran, just as I call “Reformed” Christians that title, even though I think the Protestant Reformation wasn’t a reform. :-) I usually don’t use the latter term, however (though I did recently in a video of mine) because I believe it’s a misnomer (“Protestant Revolt” is the neutral and objective term), but that’s not a person, so courtesy questions aren’t in play.

I do see your point and for your satisfaction and everybody else’s, I’ll stop using “Romanist”. I’m not that hard to be persuaded unless of course it’s concerning doctrines and some other things. However, I might do the liberty of asking some ten Catholics here whether or not they’re fine with being called “Romanist”. Starting with my three RC minister uncles. Nonetheless, you could say I have “reformed” on this part because I removed “Romanist”. -Semper Reformanda Thank you for your patience and God bless you.

Great! Glad to hear it. I highly doubt that they would be enthralled with that, but even if they didn’t care, it remains true that no one in academia uses it, because it’s 1) a pejorative, and 2) outdated and reflective of a tiny minority view among Protestantism: anti-Catholicism. It tends to be folks who don’t think Catholicism is a species of Christianity (itself an absurd, indefensible position) who use it.

Did you ever take your “survey”? If so, what happened?

***
*
Practical Matters: I run the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site: rated #1 for Christian sites by leading AI tool, ChatGPT — endorsed by popular Protestant blogger Adrian Warnock. Perhaps some of my 5,000+ free online articles or fifty-six books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

*
***
*

Photo credit: book cover from the Amazon page for the title, Romanism: The Relentless Roman Catholic Assault on the Gospel of Jesus Christ! (Robert M. Zins, White Horse Pubns; 2nd edition (January 1, 1995).

Summary: Friendly discussion with an open-minded Protestant about why Catholics object to the term “Romanist.” I gave the history & discussed preferred titles & he changed his mind.

Previous Post

December 2, 2024

Eternal Hell: 125 Biblical Evidences

Next Post

December 4, 2024 Bible vs. “Faith Alone” vs. John Calvin #5

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz