Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Lutherans & Invocation #1 (Intro)

Lutherans & Invocation #1 (Intro)

Last updated on: June 6, 2026 at 12:50 am by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Lutherans & Invocation #1 (Intro) 2026-06-06T00:50:36-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Seth Kasten (see his blog) is a member of the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod. This is one of a series of replies to his book, Against the Invocation of Saints: An Apology for the Protestant Doctrine of Prayer over and against the Doctrine of the Eastern Orthodox Church (Royal Oak, Michigan: Scholastic Lutherans, 2023). I will be using RSV for Bible passages unless otherwise noted. Words from his book will be in blue.

*****

See other installments:

Lutherans & Invocation #2 (Definitions of Prayer & Intercession; God Sharing His Glory; Views of St. Augustine & Many Other Church Fathers) [1-11-24]

Lutherans & Invocation #3 (Necromancy; Can Saints Hear Us?) [1-12-24]

Lutherans & Invocation #4 (Revelation; Luke 16) [1-17-24]

The 16th century discussions between Tübingen and Constantinople lay a basic foundation for arguments on both sides. . . .

The Tübingen theologians respond[ed] by saying that the saints cannot hear us and that attributing such abilities to them is unscriptural on the grounds of Isaiah 63:16 and 2 Kings 2:9. . . . They appeal again to Isaiah 63:16 to demonstrate the inability of saints to hear us . . . (pp. 11-12)

These theologians, in my opinion, took Isaiah 63:16 out of context. It has little or nothing to do with the communion of saints or the question of whether they (including Abraham) could “hear” us or not.

Isaiah 63:16 For thou art our Father, though Abraham does not know us and Israel does not acknowledge us; thou, O LORD, art our Father, our Redeemer from of old is thy name.

Here are a few classic Protestant commentaries on this passage:

Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers: The passage is striking as being an anticipation of the New Testament thought, that the Fatherhood of, God rests on something else than hereditary descent, and extends not to a single nation only, but to all mankind. Abraham might disclaim his degenerate descendants, but Jehovah would still recognise them.

Barnes’ Notes on the Bible: Abraham was the father of the nations – their pious and much venerated ancestor. His memory they cherished with the deepest affection, and him they venerated as the illustrious patriarch whose name all were accustomed to speak with reverence. The idea here is, that though even such a man – one so holy, and so much venerated and loved – should refuse to own them as his children, yet that God would not forget his paternal relation to them. A similar expression of his unwavering love occurs in Isaiah 49:15 : ‘Can a woman forget her sucking child?’ . . . The language here expresses the unwavering conviction of the pious, that God’s love for his people would never change; . . .

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary: It had been the besetting temptation of the Jews to rest on the mere privilege of their descent from faithful Abraham and Jacob (Mt 3:9; Joh 8:39; 4:12); now at last they renounce this, to trust in God alone as their Father, notwithstanding all appearances to the contrary. Even though Abraham, our earthly father, on whom we have prided ourselves, disown us, Thou wilt not (Isa 49:15; Ps 27:10).

Geneva Study Bible: Though Abraham would refuse us to be his children, yet you will not refuse to be our father.

2 Kings 2:9 When they had crossed, Eli’jah said to Eli’sha, “Ask what I shall do for you, before I am taken from you.” And Eli’sha said, “I pray you, let me inherit a double share of your spirit.”

This is clever. The idea is that Elijah was implying that he couldn’t answer petitionary requests after his death. But I think it’s simply an example of the practice of blessings before death. Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament states for this passage:

The request of Elisha is evidently based upon Deuteronomy 21:17 [“giving him a double portion of all that he has”], where בּ פּי־שׁנים denotes the double portion which the first-born received in (of) the father’s inheritance, . . . Elisha, resting his foot upon this law, requested of Elijah as a first-born son the double portion of his spirit for his inheritance. Elisha looked upon himself as the first-born son of Elijah in relation to the other “sons of the prophets” [see 11 examples of this phrase in 1-2 Kings], inasmuch as Elijah by the command of God had called him to be his successor and to carry on his work. The answer of Elijah agrees with this: “Thou hast asked a hard thing,” he said, because the granting of this request was not in his power, but in the power of God. He therefore made its fulfilment dependent upon a condition, which did not rest with himself, but was under the control of God: “if thou shalt see me taken from thee . . ., let it be so to thee; but if not, it will not be so.”

In this understanding, Elijah was extending the customary Jewish blessing, right before death. It has no necessary relation to possible petitions after death. The blessing had to be made before Elijah went up to heaven (in effect, dying), according to Jewish custom.

They provide quotes against the cult of the saints from Epiphanius, Basil, and Chrysostom, . . . (p. 12)

I don’t know what these quotes are, but I have a few contrary ones of my own, from my book that I edited, The Quotable Eastern Church Fathers: Distinctively Catholic Elements in Their Theology (July 2013, 303 pages):

. . . not that we may omit supplicating the saints, . . .. (St. John Chrysostom, Homily V on Matthew 1:22-23, 8; NPNF1-10)

[I]t is possible to communicate after death even with the departed, with those who are asleep, who are already crowned, who want for nothing. (St. John Chrysostom, Homily III on 2 Timothy, v. 1:13-18; NPNF1-13)

I acknowledge also the holy apostles, prophets, and martyrs; and I invoke them to supplication to God, that through them, that is, through their mediation, the merciful God may be propitious to me, and that a ransom may be made and given me for my sins. Wherefore also I honour and kiss the features of their images, inasmuch as they have been handed down from the holy apostles, and are not forbidden, but are in all our churches. (St. Basil the Great, Letter #360; NPNF2-8)

Christians are bound to the scriptures and should seek the wisdom of the church fathers and should shape their practice accordingly, . . . and as I seek to demonstrate in this work, scripture and the church fathers do not allow for such a practice [invocation of saints] even in the highly qualified form. (p. 15)

We depart, however, from the EO [“Eastern Orthodox”: as throughout] on the practice of invocation of the saints– praying to the saints, or asking them for prayer. . . . The saints pray for us, we may pray for them, but it does not follow that we may pray to the saints. (p. 18)

And this is what I will attempt to refute in these replies, following the model already observed above: counter-exegesis and competing patristic quotations. All doctrines develop, but by and large, the Church fathers accepted the practice of invocation of the saints. If it is objected that this was a late development, I reply that the canon of Scripture was also a “late” development: coming, as it did, in the end of the fourth century. Other doctrines, such as sola Scriptura and sola fide (the two “pillars” of the Protestant Revolt) are, I would argue, absent altogether from Scripture and patristic consensus. But this doesn’t stop Protestants from believing both, and making them central in their rule of faith and soteriology.

Importantly, there is a theme that we are unworthy of coming to Christ and must instead turn to saints in prayer. (p. 22)

Seth then cites a prayer along these lines from St. Ephraim:

Through your pure and acceptable supplications, persuade the righteous Judge to have compassion on me…. Set my ragged life on a straight path that I might stand blamelessly before the Lord, having you as my mediator and helper. (p. 22)

Seth sums up: “The EO practice is not strictly asking saints for prayers but is also a reliance on saints as mediators or instruments of God’s grace, . . .” (p. 23)

This is an entirely scriptural prayer based on a thoroughly scriptural teaching (as I will now demonstrate). The Bible throughout calls for intercessory prayer, and teaches that the prayers of more righteous people are relatively far more powerful. So we go (or can and should go) to the especially righteous person, who in turn goes to God on our behalf. There is no reason why we can’t do this with departed saints (and I will defend that in depth later). It makes even more sense than asking for prayer from people on earth, seeing that they are perfected in heaven and in profound union with God (making their prayers all the more powerful). We ask saints in heaven to intercede, because their prayers to God have a far greater effect or efficacy than ours do. Where is this notion found in the Bible? It’s an undeniable teaching found in lots of places:

James 5:14-18 Is any among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord; [15] and the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up; and if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven. [16] Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man has great power in its effects. [17] Eli’jah was a man of like nature with ourselves and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. [18] Then he prayed again and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth its fruit.

That’s the general principle. But then we see it massively applied all over the Bible:

Genesis 20:6-7, 17 Then God said to him [Abim’elech] in the dream, “Yes, I know that you have done this in the integrity of your heart, and it was I who kept you from sinning against me; therefore I did not let you touch her. [7] Now then restore the man’s wife; for he is a prophet, and he will pray for you, and you shall live. . . . [17] Then Abraham prayed to God; and God healed Abim’elech, and also healed his wife and female slaves so that they bore children.

This is notable in that God Himself is telling a person not to pray for himself, so that he “shall live”, but that a holier person (a “prophet”: Abraham) should do so, according to God’s own revealed will, in both special and written revelation (the Bible). Abraham was the holier person. He prayed, and good things happened as a result, because it was all according to God’s will. Abimelech was told by God Himself that Abraham would pray for him; therefore, he didn’t go “straight to God” in prayer.

1 Samuel 12:19, 23 And all the people said to Samuel, “Pray for your servants to the LORD your God, that we may not die; for we have added to all our sins this evil, to ask for ourselves a king.” . . . [23] “Moreover as for me, far be it from me [Samuel] that I should sin against the LORD by ceasing to pray for you; . . .

The same dynamic is present in this instance. The people go to the holy man (the prophet Samuel), and he prays to God, Who then forgives the people. The prophet Samuel addressed “all Israel” (12:1), rebuking them for their wickedness and rebellion against God (as prophets do). His own prayers were so powerful because of his righteousness, that he (like the prophet Elijah) could cause it to thunder and rain. The people know that they have to ask the holiest person they know to pray to God for their sins, so that they will have the best possible chance of being forgiven of them. So “all the people” asked Samuel to “pray . . . that we may not die.” Moses did the same thing as well:

Numbers 11:1-2 And the people complained in the hearing of the LORD about their misfortunes; and when the LORD heard it, his anger was kindled, and the fire of the LORD burned among them, and consumed some outlying parts of the camp. [2] Then the people cried to Moses; and Moses prayed to the LORD, and the fire abated.

Numbers 14:13, 19-20 But Moses said to the LORD, . . . [19] “Pardon the iniquity of this people, I pray thee, according to the greatness of thy steadfast love, and according as thou hast forgiven this people, from Egypt even until now.” [20] Then the LORD said, “I have pardoned, according to your word; (cf. 21:7-9; Ex 32:30)

Why was Moses different? He was set apart; he was holy, he was the great deliverer, and had a direct, profound “face to face” relationship with God (Ex 33:11; Dt 34:10-11). Likewise, Moses’ brother Aaron atoned for his people and stopped a plague (Num 16:46-48). Phinehas likewise atoned and prevented God’s wrath from “consum[ing] the people of Israel” (Num 25:11-13). King Zedekiah asked Jeremiah the prophet to “Pray for us to the LORD our God” (Jer 37:3; cf. 42:20). Simon asked St. Peter to “Pray for me to the Lord, that nothing of what you have said may come upon me” (Acts 8:24). Peter later wrote in his own epistle: “the eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous, and his ears are open to their prayer” (1 Pet 3:12; cf. Ps 34:17; Jn 9:31; 1 Jn 3:22).

1 Kings 13:6 And the king said to the man of God, “Entreat now the favor of the LORD your God, and pray for me, that my hand may be restored to me.” And the man of God entreated the LORD; and the king’s hand was restored to him, and became as it was before.

Once again, a “man of God” (probably an unnamed prophet) had more powerful and efficacious prayers. King Jeroboam — though a wicked king like all of the kings of northern Israel — still nevertheless recognized this true principle.

Job 42:8-9 “. . . my servant Job shall pray for you, for I will accept his prayer . . ..” [9] . . . and the LORD accepted Job’s prayer.

Job’s prayers had more power because he was described in the book bearing his name (in God’s eyes) as “blameless” (1:1, 8; 2:3). God specifically stated that “I will accept his prayer.” He didn’t say: “pray straight to Me so I can be merciful.”

The biblical data in this regard can thus be summarized as follows:

It’s best to “go straight to God” in prayer, unless there happens to be a person more righteous than we are, who is willing to make the same prayer request. In that case, the Bible recommends that we ask them to intercede for us or any righteous cause, rather than asking God directly, precisely because their prayers have “great power” in their “effects” (Jas 5:16). By extension, this procedure includes asking dead saints, perfected in God, to pray for us.

***

Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,500+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty-five books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. Here’s also a second page to get to PayPal. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including Zelle), see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

***

Photo credit: geralt (4-19-18) [Pixabay / Pixabay Content License]

Summary: One of my series of replies to Lutheran Seth Kasten on the invocation of saints. I address his objections and biblical and patristic arguments against the practice.

Lutheranism

Saints & Purgatory & Penance

communion of saints

intercession of the saints

invocation of the saints

Lutherans & invocation of the saints

Prayer

Seth Kasten

Previous Post

January 9, 2024

Vs. Turretin #9: Church #2 (Indefectibility)

Next Post

January 11, 2024 Lutherans & Invocation #2

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz