Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

davearmstrong

Vs. J. Oliveira #5: Talking to Dead Saints

Last updated on: October 6, 2023 at 1:01 am   by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Vs. J. Oliveira #5: Talking to Dead Saints 2023-10-06T01:01:54-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[photo from Twitter]

***

Brazilian Protestant Juan Roberto de Oliveira is the author of the book, Nenhum Caminho Leva a Roma: O pecurso até o protestantismo [No Road Leads to Rome: The Path to Protestantism]. It has no date or publisher listed. But it was “recently released.” He’s a “law graduate” and is active on Twitter (now “X”) and, especially, Instagram. When I informed Juan of my replies, he quickly wrote on Twitter: “I’ll be rebutting your rebuttals.” I wish him all the best in that endeavor. If anyone discovers that he has ever answered any of my critiques, please let me know.
*
His words will be in blue. Translations from the Portugese of his book will be made with Google Translate (with an occasional additional modification). I will use RSV for Bible translations.

*

Just as I finished my tenth installment (10-5-23), Fraternidade Newman Brasil [Newman Brazil Fraternity] published a devastatingly comprehensive (and shocking) expose entitled “Apologética da Desonestidade: Evidências de Plágio e outras Trapaças no Livro do Protestante Juan Roberto Oliveira” [Apologetics of Dishonesty: Evidence of Plagiarism and other Cheating in the Book of Protestant Juan Roberto Oliveira].

*

In light of this new information, this will be my last critique. It’s a shame, because I was enjoying myself so much, and I felt that I came up with some fresh arguments, but this book deserves no further response. It was already a very weak, poor volume (desperately in need of an editor), even if these factors weren’t in play. What I have written thus far has, in my opinion, value in and of itself, as a ten-part Catholic apologetics “course.” So it wasn’t a waste of time at all. But no more. I’m only interested in responding to serious, adequately researched, honest apologetics.

*

*****

Trying to communicate with the dead is an abomination to the Lord (Is 8.19; Dt 18.10-12). . . . The text of scripture is clear, God forbids any kind of attempt toinvocation or communication with the dead. (p. 23)

Why, then, did the prophet Samuel communicate with King Saul after he was dead? (1 Sam 28:3-20). If Juan is correct, Samuel ought to have done one of two things: 1) not appeared at all, or if he did appear, 2) refuse to talk to Saul, since in this thinking that would be a sin and forbidden. He did neither. Saul also made a prayer request of Samuel (in effect, invocating him). Samuel didn’t say he couldn’t do that. either. He simply turned down the request, noting that God had already turned against and judged Saul. Therefore, Juan’s claims above are false and unbiblical.

Jesus communicated with two dead people: Moses and Elijah, at His transfiguration (Mt 17:2-3). He couldn’t possibly engage in a forbidden sin.

Jesus talked to the dead daughter of Jairus before He raised her (” ‘Child, arise.’ And her spirit returned . .  .”: Lk 8:54-55).

Peter both prayed for a dead person (Tabitha) and then talked to her when she was dead (“Peter . . . knelt down and prayed; then turning to the body he said, “Tabitha, rise.” And she opened her eyes, . . .”: Acts 9:40).

So that’s four explicit biblical and indisputable examples that contradict Juan’s assertions above, that “God forbids any . . . communication with the dead” and that it is an “abomination to the Lord”: two involving Jesus, one with Samuel the prophet, and one with Peter the apostle.

The doctrine of the “intercession of dead saints” is so demonic that it is cited nowhere in the more than 1100 chapters of Scripture.What we have is the encouragement of prayer (intercession) from one living person on behalf of another living person. (p. 23)

It’s perfectly biblical. One simply has to be familiar with the Bible. Here is how it is supported by the Bible itself:

  1. We ask others to pray for us.

  2. Those who die in Christ are still alive and part of the Body of Christ too (Mt 22:32).

  3. Saints in heaven are very aware of and intensely interested in earthly events (Heb 12:1).

  4. We see them praying for us in the Bible (Rev 5:8, 6:9-10). It’s strongly implied that Moses and Samuel continue to intercede for us long after their deaths (Jer 15:1).

  5. The prayer of a righteous man avails much (Jas 5:16).

  6. Saints are perfected in holiness and sanctity (2 Cor3:18; Eph 3:19; 4:13); 2 Pet 1:4).

  7. Therefore their prayers would have much power (combine #5 and #6).

  8. Ergo, we can ask them to intercede to God for us. The omnipotent God — we submit — enables them to be able to hear intercessory requests by making them outside of time and in another dimension in heaven.

The Bible nowhere describes anyone in Heaven praying for whoever is on earth. (p. 24)

Here we go with dumbfounded universal negative statements again . . . In fact the Bible does mention this:

Revelation 6:9-10 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne; [10] they cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before thou wilt judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell upon the earth?”

This is what is called an “imprecatory prayer” (frequent in the Psalms). It’s asking that God judge sinners. So these martyrs now in heaven are making a prayer request regarding those on earth: that the evil people who martyred persons like them would be judged. They are involved in earthly affairs, in other words.

Also, Revelation 5:8 refers to “the twenty-four elders” (considered to be dead human beings by most commentators) holding “golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.” They have our prayers; they are involved in them. If it were all forbidden and/or impossible (Juan argues for both things), they simply wouldn’t have them. God and no one else would have the prayers. Moreover, Revelation 8:4 says the same about angels, in making reference to “the prayers of the saints from the hand of the angel before God.”

Jeremiah 15:1 Then the LORD said to me, “Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, yet my heart would not turn toward this people. . . .

God assumes that Moses and Samuel appearing before Him, interceding is a possibility. If it were not, God wouldn’t have stated this in this way. He would say something like, “No one in heaven can stand before me and pray for people on earth.”

Every time the Bible mentions praying or speaking with the dead, is in a context of magic, witchcraft, necromancy and occultism . . . (p. 24; my bolding and italics)

Really? So when Jesus spoke to the dead Moses and Elijah, He was engaging in “magic, witchcraft, necromancy [or] occultism”? When He spoke to Jairus’ daughter, who was dead, He was doing the same? When Peter spoke to the dead girl Tabitha, he was also sinfully involved with “magic, witchcraft, necromancy [or] occultism”? How odd and unbiblical Juan’s beliefs are in this regard. Ask the saints (especially the Blessed Virgin Mary) to intercede for him!

“I will do anything you ask in MY name” (John 14:14). See that Jesus said He would do ANYTHING for us if we would only ask him! See other similar passages: “This is so that the Father may give them whatever they ask in MY name” (John 15:16); “Until now you have asked nothing in my name, ask and you will receive, so that your joy may be full” (John 16:24); “I tell you this is true: if you ask the Father for anything in MY NAME he will give them” (John 16:23). (p. 25)

Yes, of course. That’s exactly what we are doing in asking a saint to intercede for us to Jesus. He’s the one who ultimately grants answers to prayers. The saints are merely His messengers and helpers. It’s because the Bible says that the prayers of righteous people have much more power. Therefore, we go to these holy saints in order to apply James 5:16 to real-life situations.

What scenario exists in which we ask Jesus directly and the prayer fails, but if we ask the saints then it would work? (p. 25)

That’s exactly what James 5 is talking about. If prayers of more righteous people have more power, then it’s clear and follows with inexorable logic that we would have a better chance to get our prayer to God answered if we ask the holiest person we can find to deliver the prayer to Jesus. This is entirely and explicitly biblical. There is no argument against it. Catholics didn’t make the Bible what it is. We follow all of its teachings.

Catholics also like to use Revelation 5:8 to try to prove the intercession of the saints. However, it has nothing to say about any saint interceding. What we see are twenty-four elders. We don’t even know who they are, and they certainly aren’t apostles, for John himself, being apostle, did not recognize any of them. (p. 26)

As I stated above, most commentators think they are dead human beings, and representatives of the Church and/or humanity. Holy Scripture itself — in the same context — calls them “priests”  (Strong’s word #2409: hiereus) in Revelation 5:10. That is always used of human beings in Scripture. We don’t know whether John recognized any of them or not. The text doesn’t specify.

Now, no elder is aware of each specific case in each prayer, they just had them before God. (p. 26)

Why? Why would they have them in the first place, is the question. If they do, it stands to reason that it is just as plausible to speculate that they know the contents of the prayer than it is to think that they don’t. We can only speculate based on what w have in inspired revelation.

We know nothing we know about them. We don’t even know if they are characters from the Old Testament. (p. 26).

We know they are “priests” from Revelation 5:10. That could be in the OT or NT sense.

In Revelation 6.9-11, the martyrs who died in the great tribulation were kept under the altar of God. These martyrs cried out in favor of themselves, asking justice to God against their murderers. Note that the martyrs did not cry out in favor of anyone, but only in favor of themselves. (p. 26)

They prayed for justice as regards themselves, but the prayer was an imprecatory one directed towards evil men on earth who martyred Christians. That is the point. If no one in heaven has anything to do with earth and people on earth, then they couldn’t do that at all. It would be an absurd and biblically self-contradictory passage. God would answer them, saying something like, “what have you to do with people on the earth? Nothing! That’s My business!”

*

***
*

Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,300+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty-three books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

*

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

*

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, including 100% tax deduction, etc., see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

*

***
*

Summary: Juan Oliveira makes an argument that “any” communication with the dead is an abomination. I produce counter-examples from Jesus, Peter, & the prophet Samuel.

Anti-Catholicism

Saints & Purgatory & Penance

communion of saints

invocation of saints

Prayer

saints interceding

supplication to saints

talking to dead saints

Previous Post



September 30, 2023

Vs. J. Oliveira #4: Liguori's Mary

Next Post



October 3, 2023 Vs. J. Oliveira #6: Bible & Purgatory

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah


Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And obeisance doesn't mean "worship". It means "respect", "obey", or "submission". Very weird that you ..."

Mariah


Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"Many of these scriptures you have noted have been taken out of context. With Daniel, ..."

Mariah


Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Protestants often point out that Jesus is now triumphant in heaven and object to Catholics ..."

Anthony


Three More Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Old Testament book is entirely written as a dialogue between God and a prophet?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zechariah Malachi Amos Habakkuk

Books by This Author Books by Dave Armstrong

See All Titles »

Related posts from Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Three More Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism (#6-4)

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Bible & Catholicism on Mortal Sin (vs. John...

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Top Ten Anti-Catholic Lies (#10-7)

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Does Catholic Intercession of Saints Require Omniscience?

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube