Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Cana: Archaeological Comparison of “Rival” Sites

Cana: Archaeological Comparison of “Rival” Sites

Last updated on: June 6, 2026 at 12:02 am by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

Cana: Archaeological Comparison of “Rival” Sites 2026-06-06T00:02:04-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John 2:1-2, 6, 11 (RSV) On the third day there was a marriage at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there; [2] Jesus also was invited to the marriage, with his disciples. . . . [6] Now six stone jars were standing there, . . . [11] This, the first of his signs, Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

I differ with the standard acceptance of Cana, thought to be located at Kefr / Kafr Qana (the place our guide took us to when I visited Israel in 2014), and opt for Khirbet Qana, as a result of more recent research. Here are a few summary statements,

Recent excavations have tipped the scale decisively in favor of Khirbet Qana as the location of Cana . . .

Footnote: Excavations [since 1998] have been under the direction of Douglas Edwards (1) (University of Puget Sound) and Jack Olive (Pacific Lutheran University) in association with the Israel Antiquities Authority. . . .

[S]cholarly opinion has shifted to Khirbet Qana as New Testament Cana, a deduction now being borne out by the excavations (begun in 1998). (2)

Biblical Cana is best identified with Khirbet Qana, a low hill on the north side of the Beth Netofa Valley. (3)

A first-century date for the construction beneath the Roman church [at Kefr Qana: the currently most widely accepted claimant for Cana] has never been established, . . . A more likely choice for ancient Cana is Khirbet Kana . . . (4) (5)

The article “Cana” in the Catholic Encyclopedia, written by Bernard Ward in 1908, notes,

No direct indication can be gathered of its locality, except that it was not far from either Nazareth or Capharnaum, and higher than the latter city, . . . and that an ordinary traveler from Jerusalem to Nazareth would pass through or near it. . . . An old tradition identifies the site of Cana with modern Kefr’ Kenna, a village of about 600 inhabitants. . . . The tradition dates back at least to the eighth century, and probably a good deal earlier, . . .

In the section “Kafr Kanna” in a book about old churches in Israel, Denys Pringle writes,

In the twelfth century, Cana of Galilee came to be generally identified with Khirbat Qana (q.v.), a site lying 8.5 km [5.3 miles] to the north-north-west. The earlier tradition which identified Cana with Kafr Kanna, however, never seems to have been entirely supplanted, and from the mid fourteenth century it began to reassert itself . . .

Unfortunately no proper archaeological examination of this early [synagogue?] building was made before the new church was built [by the Franciscans in 1881]. Although its precise character remains uncertain, however, it seems very probable that it was in origin a synagogue of the third or fourth century AD . . . (The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Corpus: Volume 1, A-K (excluding Acre and Jerusalem), Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 285)

James H. Charlesworth offers somewhat ambiguous information,

Where is Jesus’ Cana — the Cana mentioned in Jn 2? After three seasons of excavating, Peter Richardson and Douglas Edwards have most likely located [it] . . . It is Khirbet Cana. Since the sixth century C.E. it also has been venerated as the Cana of the Gospel of John. . . . The first century C.E. houses at Khirbet Cana are reminiscent of those at Capernaum and Yodefat . . .

It is unlikely, however, that the so-called synagogue dates to the time of Jesus, and probably was constructed in the late second or third century C.E. (6)

But he clarified elsewhere in his book, in a “Postscript,” drawing a conclusion that is more hopeful for this site being Cana:

The question of a synagogue at Khirbet Qana, discussed above, has been clarified since 2000: the public building in the southwest corner of the hilltop is certainly a synagogue, from the second century C.E. at the latest. [my italics] (7)

Urban C. von Wahlde adds very helpful (if not decisive) historical information:

In his clear and careful study, Herrojo shows that the earliest reports (those of Josephus, Eusebius, Jerome), all locate Cana at Khirbet Qana. (8) Furthermore, in his evaluation of the reports up to the time of the Crusaders, Herrojo concludes that throughout this period there was no evidence of any doubt regarding the town’s location. Herrojo analyzed each tradition and evaluated it in terms of its likely accuracy. In none of the descriptions could Cana’s location be associated with Kefr Kenna either with “certainty” or even with “high probability,” and while at times the reports were unclear, no description was incompatible with Khirbet Qana. Consequently, Herrojo concluded that up to the time of the Crusaders there was only a single tradition of Cana’s location, and this was consistently associated with Khirbet Qana. . . .

Herrojo concludes that Kefr Kenna and Khirbet Qana are recognized as distinct locations and are not confused. During this [Crusader] period ten pilgrim reports “certainly” identify Cana with Khirbet Qana and four others do so with “great probability.” In addition, three are “ambiguous” and could refer to either place. None “certainly” identify Cana with Kefr Kenna; none are incompatible with Khirbet Qana. Finally, no report indicates doubt about the location of the town. In short, the results throughout the Crusader period are the same as for the earlier periods. (10) [Footnote: This refutes the argument of those who have proposed that the Crusaders introduced the tradition of Khirbet Qana and that this interrupted the otherwise consistent tradition of associating Cana with Kefr Kenna]

The first indication of Kefr Kenna as a site of pilgrimage is in 1566, when a Greek Orthodox church is built there. . . . The first written indication of any uncertainty about the location of biblical Cana is expressed in the book of Francisco Quaresmio in 1626. (11)

Herrojo noted that two events between 1630 and 1640 started the trend of Kefr Kenna being regarded as Cana: Khirbet Qana was depopulated and fell into ruins, and the purported tomb of Jonah there was abandoned. Up until that time, pilgrims (including Franciscans) continued to regard Khirbet Qana as the biblical Cana. Hence, the reasons for the change obviously had nothing to do with archaeology or other historical indicators of authentic traditions and locations.

Tom McCollough, who has directed the excavations at Khirbet Qana, describes another piece of evidence found there:

We have uncovered a large Christian veneration cave complex that was used by Christian pilgrims who came to venerate the water-to-wine miracle. This complex was used beginning in the late fifth or early sixth century and continued to be used by pilgrims into the 12th-century Crusader period. The pilgrim texts we have from this period that describe what pilgrims did and saw when they came to Cana of Galilee match very closely what we have exposed as the veneration complex. . . .

His [Josephus’] references to Cana align geographically with the location of Khirbet Qana . . . (12)

The article also notes that “amazingly, an altar and a shelf hold the remains of a stone vessel with room for five more.” (13)

Perhaps tour guides and those who research biblical archaeology can be excused for (I believe) mistakenly identifying Cana as Kefr Kenna, since Herrojo’s work was only available in 1999 (and in Spanish), and excavations at Khirbet Qana were only undertaken in 1998. But now we know a lot of things that we didn’t know before, and they appear to me to be quite decisive.

FOOTNOTES

1) See: Douglas R. Edwards, “Khirbet Qana: from Jewish Village to Christian Pilgrimage site”, The Roman and Byzantine Near East, vol. 3. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology, ed. John H. Humphrey, 2002, 101-132. See an Appendix (by Danny Sion) to this article concerning coins.

2) Peter Richardson, “Khirbet Qana (and Other Villages) as a Context for Jesus”, in Jesus and Archaeology, edited by James H. Charlesworth (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2006), 120-121.

3) Mark T. Schuler, “Recent Archaeology of Galilee and the Interpretation of Texts from the Galilean Ministry of Jesus” (Concordia Theological Quarterly, Vol. 71:2, April 2007, 99-117); citation from p. 105.

4) John McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker: 1991), 174.

5) See many photographs of the site at “Khirbet Cana” (BibleWalks).

6) Charlesworth, ibid., 39-40. Accessed via Amazon’s “Look Inside” function.

7) Ibid., 144.

8) J. Herrojo, Cana de Galilea y su localizacion: Un examen critico de las fuentes (Paris: J. Gabalda, 1999), 22-35, 45.

9) Herrojo, 36-45.

10) Herrojo, 46-88.

11) Urban C. von Wahlde, chapter: “Archaeology and John’s Gospel,” in Charlesworth, ibid., 540-541. Accessed via Amazon’s “Look Inside” function.

12) in Neal Baker, “Experts say lost tunnels in Israel could be where Jesus turned water into wine,” New York Post, August 30, 2018.

13) Baker, ibid.

***

Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,200+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty-one books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, including 100% tax deduction, etc., see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

***

Photo credit: Miracle at Cana (1887), by Vladimir Makovsky (1846-1920) [public domain / Wikiart]

***

Summary: Where is the wedding site at Cana? Tour guides and tour maps tell us one thing, but archaeological consensus increasingly points to an abandoned nearby town.

Bible and Tradition

Trinitarianism & Christology

archaeology & the Bible

Gospel of John & archaeology

Gospel of John's Accuracy

historical accuracy of the Bible

John & archaeology

John’s historical accuracy

New testament archaeology

St. John

wedding at Cana

Previous Post

March 29, 2023

Ziklag (David's Refuge from Saul) & Archaeology

Next Post

March 31, 2023 Ezra: Archaeological & Historical Corroboration

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz