Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
“Peter and Paul” Distorts Peter’s Life & Paul’s Teaching

“Peter and Paul” Distorts Peter’s Life & Paul’s Teaching

Last updated on: February 25, 2023 at 3:32 pm by Dave Armstrong

0 Comments

“Peter and Paul” Distorts Peter’s Life & Paul’s Teaching 2023-02-25T15:32:23-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a movie I liked when I first saw it (that year coincided with my call to be an apologist and doing street witnessing). It formed my impression of what St. Paul was like, just as Jesus of Nazareth (1977) played a big role in my initial Protestant conversion to Christ that year. We recently watched it again.

First, the good points: of course, Sir Anthony Hopkins is superb, as always, as Paul. Every Christian needs to see this fabulous portrayal. Robert Foxworth plays Peter (rather plainly, as it were). 95% of it is good acting and an accurate, dramatically effective presentation of three-quarters of the Book of Acts. It provides a realistic view of what it feels (and felt) like to be a Christian under serious persecution. Overall, I like it, and recommend it for others to see.

But it has several serious flaws, and exhibits the usual (Protestant or Protestant-influenced) bias against Peter and in favor of Paul. This is what I particularly wanted to address. I thought I heard at some point that it was a Lutheran production, and/or funded by Lutherans, but I couldn’t confirm that. Here are my criticisms and pointing out of demonstrable errors of fact, over against the biblical account:

1) First of all, in a film called Peter and Paul one would rightly assume, I think, that both men would be adequately portrayed, and a good summation of their lives presented. In the case of Paul, the film does that, and gives a fairly accurate depiction of his missionary journeys. But it is almost grotesquely biased towards Paul and almost hostile to Peter. Peter is virtually a bumbling, vacillating, unimpressive fool, which may have been true (at least at times) before he received the Holy Spirit — no different from the other disciples before the Resurrection –, but was not so after.

The movie deliberately skips over the first seven chapters of Acts, where Peter appears in many momentous scenes. He preaches on the Day of Pentecost, presides over mass baptisms, raises the dead, heals with his shadow, judges Ananias and Sapphira (who were struck dead by God), receives a revelation about receiving the Gentiles, presides over the Jerusalem Council, and is clearly presented as the heroic leader of the early Church.

This movie, however, shows none of that. It shows him being freed from jail by God, but of course that is God’s doing, not Peter’s. If we were to go by this film alone, Peter sat on his hands for many years, kept fishing, spent a little time at Antioch, and if he did anything, it was always by Paul’s lead and inspiration. He kept hanging around Jerusalem, went to “Babylon” (the film took that literally, but most commentators think it was a code word for “Rome”), and then suddenly grew a spine right before he went to Rome. The film didn’t show him saying much at all at the Jerusalem Council, but Paul had a big speech and is presented as the leader. That is almost the opposite of the biblical account in Acts 15.

2) The film invented fictional accounts of Peter being jealous of Paul, and Paul being bitter over a neglect from the Church leaders in Jerusalem for “eight years.” None of that is remotely present in the Bible. So why make it up? To be fair, it also showed that Paul had a ferocious temper and has him stating with regret several times that he suffered from pride, which may conceivably have been true (especially the temper), but I don’t recall the New Testament stating much, if anything, about either.

3) Paul is portrayed over and over talking about “faith alone” which he never does (not in those words). The phrase “faith alone” only appears in James, where it is condemned. Paul actually taught a very Catholic view of grace, faith, and works as one harmonious whole: salvation comes by grace through faith, with works included in the equation as part and parcel of faith, or the other side of the same coin. One would never know this from the film.

4) The worst flaw is a ridiculously fictional supposed scenario whereby Paul vehemently opposed the ruling of the Jerusalem Council: that the Gentiles should “abstain from the pollutions of idols and from unchastity and from what is strangled and from blood” (Acts 15:20, RSV). The film makes out that Paul thought this decision was a scandalous retreat back into salvation by works, in cahoots with the Judaizers. I’m not sure, but I think it was implied that this was the downfall of the Galatians (Paul rebuked them roundly in his letter).

There is not the slightest bit of truth in any of that. The decree of the Jerusalem Council was consensus: with Peter and James, as well as Paul. It’s not Pelagianism or any other kind of error. It was directly confirmed by the Holy Spirit (Acts 15:28). Paul not only didn’t oppose this at all; he actively proclaimed it, with Timothy:

Acts 16:4 As they went on their way through the cities, they delivered to them for observance the decisions which had been reached by the apostles and elders who were at Jerusalem.

***

Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,000+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty-one books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, including 100% tax deduction, etc., see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

***

Photo credit: Peter and Paul [Thomas Hawk / Flickr / CC BY-NC 2.0 license]

***

Summary: Peter and Paul: a 1981 film starring Anthony Hopkins, has several good qualities, but ultimately misrepresents St. Peter’s Life & distorts St. Paul’s true teachings.

Salvation & Justification

Previous Post

February 23, 2023

Asbury Revival & My Many Predictions of Revival Since 2000

Next Post

February 27, 2023 Reply to Rodrigo Silva on NT Evidences for the Papacy

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Special pleading, and not a serious response to my arguments . . ."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""no man needs to teach us."Didn't you just teach us?"

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

""Catholics say they are the only church that can lead people into heaven."In fact, we ..."

Dave Armstrong

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

"And lastly, I belong to no denomination and am free to serve God as He ..."

Mariah

Is Venerating Men & Angels Worship? ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz