Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Reply to Baptist Gavin Ortlund on Baptism

Reply to Baptist Gavin Ortlund on Baptism

Last updated on: May 20, 2022 at 2:20 pm by Dave Armstrong

Reply to Baptist Gavin Ortlund on Baptism 2022-05-20T14:20:52-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Gavin Ortlund is an author, speaker, and apologist for the Christian faith, who serves as the senior pastor of First Baptist Church of Ojai in Ojai, California. Gavin has a Ph.D. from Fuller Theological Seminary in historical theology, and an M.Div from Covenant Theological Seminary. He is the author of seven books as well as numerous academic and popular articles. For a list of publications, see his CV. He runs the YouTube channel Truth Unites, which seeks to provide an “irenic” voice on theology, apologetics, and the Christian life.

I greatly admire and appreciate Gavin’s ecumenical methodology, and viewpoint. It’s extremely refreshing to hear in this hyper-polarized age. He is an exemplary Christian role model of this open-minded, charitable approach. We all learn and “win” when good, constructive dialogue takes place. It’s never a “loss” to arrive at more truth or to recognize one’s own error.

*****

This is a reply to Gavin’s video, “Trent Horn and Gavin Ortlund on Baptism” (4-27-22). Gavin’s words will be in blue. Trent Horn’s in green. Trent is, of course, an excellent Catholic apologist and quite capable of holding his own. This reply is no reflection on him at all. I just thought I’d add my $00.02′ worth, since I’ve debated this issue a few times in recent days. This was an excellent, thought-provoking debate. It stimulated me to make responses. This is why dialogue is so helpful and wonderful.

I do understand baptism to be more than just a symbol. . . . I understand baptism to give grace. I understand God to be the One working through baptism . . . I’ve used the language of “sign and seal”, . . . I just don’t understand it to be the cause of regeneration . . . It’s kind of like when we say “the blood of Jesus saves”: we don’t mean the blood as distinct from the flesh. Similarly, when we say “baptism saves” we don’t mean baptism as distinct from those events that lead up to it, but we mean baptism in its symbolic and kind of representative character. [4:46-5:55]

This is interesting. I thank Gavin for his articulate explanation (as usual). I would note two things here. I did a search of “save” and “blood” in the RSV and found nothing directly applicable, but I did find this interesting passage: “Since, therefore, we are now justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God” (Rom 5:9). This seems to back up Gavin’s analogy. “Justified by his blood” would not be strictly literal, but is a synonym for saying “saved by him.” Other similar verses:

Romans 3:25 (RSV) whom God put forward as an expiation by his blood, . . .

Ephesians 1:7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace

Revelation 1:5 . . . To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood

My second observation would be to ask Gavin: can you produce any direct biblical indication (beyond analogy to Christ’s blood) for why you take this particular view?

I wouldn’t say that baptism justifies. I would say that we can speak of God communicating grace through baptism, which would include forgiveness. [6:38-49]

How is this different, though, from simply saying that “forgiveness of sins comes through baptism” or “baptism is God’s means to forgive our sins”? It seems to be a distinction without a difference. But if this forgiveness is ongoing, as Gavin also said, then baptism offering that would not be a unique thing.

It would be in that “bucket” [of sanctification] [7:11-13].

For Protestants, sanctification is a literal thing, but is formally disconnected from justification and salvation in a way different from Catholic theology. But it’s good to find the common ground of baptism doing something real and actual in the Christian’s life.

Gavin states that the receiving of grace through baptism is not “automatic” and would “depend upon receiving the sacrament worthily, which I would understand as by faith.” [7:22-36]

This would rule out baptism of infants by definition (a point that Trent also immediately made in response). Trent said that he didn’t know of anyone who believes in baptismal regeneration, who don’t also believe in infant baptism. Actually Churches of Christ believe in solely believer’s baptism, which regenerates. They deny the need for infant baptism, but they do so also because they deny the existence of original sin (no sin to be saved from, in other words). Disciples of Christ came from the same Campbellite origins, but they appear to accept infant baptism.

Gavin then makes the same point about Churches of Christ. I am answering while I listen, so I anticipated his answer (I didn’t merely repeat or reiterate it). Trent quickly agreed. That leaves four groups. I would add a fifth: the Salvation Army doesn’t baptize at all: or at least it doesn’t require it or consider it a necessity.

Gavin asked if Cornelius was saved by baptism (see Acts 10). Trent replied that it was an exception or “boundary case.” I agree. This was a unique transitional period, with Gentiles coming into the Church, and the advent of the indwelling Holy Spirit, as seen in Acts 2 on the Day of Pentecost. During the transition, there are a few people mentioned in Scripture who can’t be neatly fit into normative categories. But Gavin takes the opposite view and states that the case of Cornelius is “consistent with how baptism is functioning in Acts, where it just doesn’t look like you ever have the Spirit poured out or any fruits of regeneration at the time of baptism” [13:24-36].

I think Acts 2:38 strongly implies receiving the Holy Spirit upon baptism (“be baptized . . . and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit”.). So does Paul’s baptism by Ananias (” ‘that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ . . . Then he rose and was baptized”: Acts 9:17-18). Romans 6:3-4 states that we are “baptized . . . in order that, . . . we too may live a new life.” A “new life” is certainly a fruit of regeneration. Colossians 2:11-13 says that baptism appears to be the cause of us being “made alive.” Galatians 3:27 says that the result of being baptized is being “clothed with Christ.” What more can anyone ask for?! Titus 3:5 seems to directly connect salvation to “the washing of regeneration” accompanied by “renewal in the Holy Spirit.” Sins are washed away (“be baptized, and wash away your sins”: Acts 22:16).

I don’t think this is correct, is that baptism is when one comes spiritually alive to God. [17:55-18:03]

Again, I would say, how is it not being made spiritually alive, to “receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” and “be filled with the Holy Spirit”, to be given a “new life” and “made alive” and “clothed with Christ”? All of this appears to me to be directly tied to baptism as the cause, in the above passages. Moreover, four passages tie baptism in with being “saved”: using that very word (Acts 2:40; 1 Pet 3:21; Mk 16:16; Titus 3:5). If all of that is not “com[ing] spiritually alive to God” what words would be a clear indication that that took place? I submit that it seems to me to be as explicit and clear as it can possibly be. In Colossians, Paul even uses the phrase “made alive” that Gavin himself uses, as the very definition of regeneration [25:42-47].

To put it another way, what would be a hypothetical example of a Bible verse that was so compelling that Gavin would be convinced of baptismal regeneration in the Catholic sense?

Gavin mentions many people that he has observed as a pastor, undergoing a spiritual conversion and manifesting faith and its fruits before they ever get baptized. Trent agreed that faith precedes baptism in adults and that the Holy Spirit is already at work. He brought up the Catholic distinction between actual and sanctifying grace. The former is God urging or moving a person to go on to receiving sanctifying grace. Trent called the positive movement prior to baptism a “work of grace” and a “spiritual kick in the pants” but not regeneration, and said that these matters are “complicated” and also include the aspect of psychology and “natural virtues.”

Gavin affirms — just for the record — that he is a “Calvinist.” He believes in all five points of TULIP (as he said shortly after). So he is a Reformed Baptist [28:26-27].

Trent mentions “baptism of desire” and “baptism of blood” (martyrdom) as exceptions to the rule of baptism being the cause of regeneration.

Gavin brings up the question of the eternal fate of unbaptized infants and mentions limbo. Limbo was never an official dogma of the Catholic Church, as I have written about.

Gavin states that the Church fathers meant different things by “baptismal regeneration.” Trent noted (as I would have) that patristic historians like J. N. D. Kelly describe baptismal regeneration among the fathers with words like “universal.” But Gavin reaffirmed that the term “baptismal regeneration” was used differently by different fathers. That may very well be, but the more knowledgeable such a scholar was, he would, I think, incorporate that fact into his analyses.

Trent asked Gavin which historical figure would have been the first to affirm his own view on baptism. Gavin said it was Justin Martyr.

Gavin brings up what I would say is another excellent biblical reference to biblical regeneration, and asks Trent’s thoughts on it:

Hebrews 10:22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.

Trent said this referred to an event in the past (baptism) that is still having an effect in the future. He describes what the passage refers to as “perseverance rooted in baptismal graces.” He says that the phrase “hearts sprinkled clean” is also a reference to baptism. Fascinating! I never considered this verse before in relation to baptism. There probably are other passages that I have missed that don’t have the word “baptism” in them.

This was one of the finest, most excellent, Protestant-Catholic exchanges I have ever seen in my 42 years of committed Christian discipleship. This is how it ought to be done. I thoroughly enjoyed it and learned a lot of things. Super kudos to both Gavin and Trent!

***

Practical Matters: Perhaps some of my 4,000+ free online articles (the most comprehensive “one-stop” Catholic apologetics site) or fifty books have helped you (by God’s grace) to decide to become Catholic or to return to the Church, or better understand some doctrines and why we believe them.

Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I’m always in need of more funds: especially monthly support. “The laborer is worthy of his wages” (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a full-time Catholic apologist, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.

PayPal donations are the easiest: just send to my email address: [email protected]. You’ll see the term “Catholic Used Book Service”, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, including 100% tax deduction, etc., see my page: About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong / Donation Information. Thanks a million from the bottom of my heart!

***

Photo credit: PublicDomainPictures (7-18-13) [Pixabay / Pixabay License]

***

Summary: Baptist pastor & author Gavin Ortlund had a wonderful, stimulating YouTube chat with Catholic apologist Trent Horn. I interject my own thoughts here and there.

Baptism and Sacramentalism

adult baptism

Baptism

baptism & grace

baptism & justification

baptism & salvation

baptismal regeneration

infused justification

initial justification

Is Baptism Necessary to Salvation?

Justification

justification by faith

justification by faith alone

non-sacramental baptism

symbolic adult baptism

symbolic baptism

Trent Horn

Truth Unites

Previous Post

May 19, 2022

Reply to Baptist Gavin Ortlund's Critique of Icons

Next Post

May 23, 2022 Material Sufficiency of Scripture & Anti-Catholic Sophistry

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz