Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Argument & Debate in Evangelism & Apologetics R Biblical!

Argument & Debate in Evangelism & Apologetics R Biblical!

Last updated on: October 12, 2021 at 1:28 pm by Dave Armstrong

Argument & Debate in Evangelism & Apologetics R Biblical! 2021-10-12T13:28:48-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Henry Karlson’s Bizarre Antipathy Towards Scriptural and Pauline Apologetics Methodology

Henry Karlson, a Catholic writer at Patheos, has put up yet another of his hit-pieces against conventional biblical apologetics, entitled, Apologists Must Embrace Charity Not Argumentation As The Foundation Of Their Work (10-10-21). It’s one of a long line of his polemics along these lines. See my critique: Henry Karlson’s Odd Obsession with Anti-Apologetics (12-19-19).

Not only does he make the utterly obvious point that all apologetics must be done in and with love and without pride (no conscious, sane apologist I have ever met would ever dream of denying that), but he has to go much further and trash the very method of rational argumentation or dispute or debate itself. Here is what he (rather ludicrously) stated:

Argument and debate have little to no room for grace . . .

He [St. Paul] had to come to realize the greater truth and that the means to realize that greater truth came from grace, and not from argumentation . . .

Paul became a great preacher of the faith when he realized this; when his mission was one of grace, he could and would share the grace he accepted and changed him; he could help others experience grace and with it the presence of God in their lives. For it is in that presence faith grows, as through it, one can learn truths which can never be spoken, truths which could not be properly expounded upon through any form of argumentation. . . .

Apologetics has a place in the Christian faith. It should not be about making converts through argumentation, for that is not how true conversion is established.

Karslon clarified this in the combox for his article:

I didn’t say anything about argument and debate being “unbiblical” (however, 2 Tim 2:14 and 2Tim 2:23 connect with my theme, which is about useless quarrelling and debates). The whole discussion is about people who are argumentative and quarrelsome by nature; it is not about rejection the use of rational arguments when they are appropriate. This is why someone must be careful and not equivocate on the term argument to create a strawman position on what I have said here (not saying you have, but I know others who have). Scripture, the saints, spiritual masters all remind us to not be seeking people to debate, to cause problems and think by doing so, we will win people over (similar to the way we should not seek martyrdom and think if we die that we are martyrs). And so, I was clear, there is room for proper apologetics, but when it all becomes a show and all about debates, then such apologists remind me of Abelard who thought himself superior to all and sought to make a name for himself by the way he debated others (which it did do, we can see the spiritual fallout of his attitude as well in the rest of his life).

This is not, however, what he stated above. He was bashing argumentation and dispute in and of themselves, not merely when engaged in with unworthy motivations and in pride. He threw the baby out with the bathwater. He did not critique only the shortcomings of being quarrelsome or contentious in these statements. If he had, I would have heartily agreed with him (I wouldn’t have even written this article). He needs to, therefore, retract these statements or modify them in order to not give the impression of arguing what it seems to me he was indeed clearly arguing.

Nor does Holy Scripture decry the notion of “seeking people to debate“: as my excerpts below prove. St. Paul, by deliberate intention, sought out dialogue and the debate that would inevitably occur when he was talking with both Jews and pagan Greeks (such as on Mars Hill in Athens). He was prepared to cite pagan poets and philosophers in the midst of these dialogues (as on Mars Hill). The Bible says that the Apostle Paul “went in, as was his custom, and for three weeks he argued with them [in the synagogues] from the scriptures” (Acts 17:2, RSV, as throughout), and “argued in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the market place every day” (Acts 17:17), and “argued in the synagogue every sabbath” (Acts 18:4), and that he “went into the synagogue and argued with the Jews” (Acts 18:19), and that “he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, arguing and pleading about the kingdom of God” (Acts 19:8), and “argued daily in the hall of Tyran’nus. This continued for two years” (Acts 19:9-10).

St. Paul not only did what Karlson claims he should not do, he did so, as the book of Acts informs us, for long periods of time: “three weeks” (Acts 17:2), “every day” (for who knows how long) (17:17), “every Sabbath” (18:4), “three months” (Acts 19:8), and “daily . . . for two years” (19:9-10).

And, of course, he was successful in these efforts of seeking dialogues and debates for evangelistic purposes. Karlson falsely claimed that it was untrue that “by doing so, we will win people over.” To the contrary, the Bible reports: “And some of them [Jews] were persuaded, and joined Paul and Silas; as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women” (17:4), and that he “persuaded Jews and Greeks” (18:4). After his famous discourse on Mars Hill (Acts 17), it is written that “others said, ‘We will hear you again about this’ ” (17:32), and that “some men joined him and believed, among them Dionys’ius the Are-op’agite and a woman named Dam’aris and others with them” (17:34). The pagan Greek Demetrius was alarmed that “you see and hear that not only at Ephesus but almost throughout all Asia this Paul has persuaded and turned away a considerable company of people” (19:26).

St. Paul wrote: “I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some” (1 Cor 9:22). With the philosophical Greeks, he certainly engaged in philosophical disputation. He would have had to do so in order to persuade them. And we see an example of him doing exactly that on Mars Hill: applying his own expressed methodology.

Lastly, lest Karlson claim that these activities were only for Paul, but not for (at least potentially) any and every Christian, Paul repeatedly urges us to imitate him (1 Cor 4:16; 11:1; Phil 3:17; 4:9; 1 Thess 1:6; 2 Thess 3:7-9).

Karlson draws several false dichotomies. In his title, he pits argumentation directly against charity, and in these other statements he pits it against grace and conversion to Christ. The only logical conclusion we can draw from such extreme statements is that he has rejected argumentation altogether for the sake of the gospel and the apologetics that defends it and the doctrines of the faith. This is self-refuting and viciously circular because this very post of his is an extended argument that argumentation itself, by nature, isn’t charitable or in harmony with grace. Absurd!

Karlson cites exactly one Bible passage and makes passing reference to one more. I will provide below many biblical sanctions of (contrary to Karlson’s unhinged rantings) rational argumentation, dispute, debate, and dialogue as a means to both (lovingly) preach and defend the gospel:

1 Peter 3:15 (RSV) but in your hearts reverence Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence;

The Greek word for defense is apologia, which occurs eight times in the NT. It is the word from which the English apology is derived, but in its classical definition, it did not mean an admission of wrong, but rather, a defense or justification of a belief. Apologetics, or the defense of the Christian faith, also comes from the same word. Students of philosophy or classics (or perhaps, Greek) are familiar with Plato’s Apology, which is an account of Socrates’ defense of himself (i.e., an argument) at the Athenian trial that sentenced him to death.

St. Paul makes reference to apologia three times, in terms of evangelism and his own method:

1 Corinthians 9:3 . . . This is my defense to those who would examine me.[Paul is defending with many arguments his right to receive wages]

Philippians 1:7 . . . you are all partakers with me of grace, both in my imprisonment and in the defense and confirmation of the gospel.

Philippians 1:16 . . . I am put here for the defense of the gospel;

It’s also applied to his defense of himself at his trial (Acts 22:1; 25:16).

The related word apologeomai also appears many times (e.g., Lk 12:11; 21:14; Acts 19:33; Rom 2:15; 2 Cor 12:19).

Dialegomai [Strong’s word #1256 — appears 13 times in the NT] is the source of the English word dialogue. Thayer’s Greek Lexicon defines it as: “To converse, discourse with one, argue, discuss . . . drawing arguments from the Scriptures . . . with the idea of disputing prominent.”

Vine’s Expository Dictionary comments upon it as follows:

To think different things, with oneself, to ponder, then to dispute with others; is translated ‘to reason’ in Acts 17:2, 18:4, 19, 24:25, KJV . . . 2. To converse, argue, dispute: Mk 9:34, Acts 17:17, 19:8-9, 24:12, Jude 9. 3. To converse, dispute, discuss, discourse with; most frequently, to reason or dispute with: Heb 12:5, Acts 20:7, 9 . . . not by way of a sermon, but by discourse of a more conversational character. [under “Reason,” “Dispute,” and “Discourse”]

Here are five examples of St. Paul doing this (disputing, arguing, debating, dialoguing, etc.):

Acts 17:1-4 Now when they had passed through Amphip’olis and Apollo’nia, they came to Thessaloni’ca, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. [2] And Paul went in, as was his custom, and for three weeks he argued with them from the scriptures, [3] explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.” [4] And some of them were persuaded, and joined Paul and Silas; as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women.

Acts 17:17 So he argued in the synagogue with the Jews and the devout persons, and in the market place every day with those who chanced to be there.

Acts 18:4 And he argued in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded Jews and Greeks.

Acts 18:19 . . . he himself went into the synagogue and argued with the Jews.

Acts 19:8-10 And he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, arguing and pleading about the kingdom of God; [9] but when some were stubborn and disbelieved, speaking evil of the Way before the congregation, he withdrew from them, taking the disciples with him, and argued daily in the hall of Tyran’nus. [10] This continued for two years, so that all the residents of Asia heard the word of the Lord, both Jews and Greeks.

Additional verses: Mk 9:34; Acts 24:12 and 24:25; Jude 9. Moreover, dialogizomai has a similar general meaning: Mt 16:7-8; 21:25; Mk 2:6, 8 (2); 8:16-17; 9:33; Lk 1:29; 3:15; 12:17; 20:14.

Suzeteo [Strong’s word #4802], according to Thayer, means “To discuss, dispute, question”, and Vine defines it as “To seek or examine together, to discuss.” [under, “Reason”]. See:

Mark 12:28 And one of the scribes came up and heard them disputing with one another, and seeing that he answered them well, asked him, “Which commandment is the first of all?”

This statement was in reference to Jesus’ discussion with the Sadducees about resurrection (Mk 12:18-27). Thus, Jesus used the techniques of “argument,” “debate,” and “disputation,” just as St. Paul did, and on very many occasions as well, especially with the Pharisees. If, then, Jesus Himself used “apologetics,” dare we do less?

Jesus is shown on many occasions engaging in dispute and argument and debate with the Pharisees, scribes and elders, and Sadducees in particular. He actually used socratic method quite often, as I have written about.

Acts 9:29 preaching boldly in the name of the Lord. And he [St. Paul] spoke and disputed against the Hellenists; but they were seeking to kill him.

The related word suzetesis is found in John 3:25; Acts 15:2, 7 and 28:29; 1 Timothy 6:4; and Titus 3:9.

***

Photo credit: Circe Denyer [PublicDomainPictures.Net / CC0 Public Domain license]

***

Summary: Henry Karlson rants against despised apologists, arguing that argument and debate in evangelism and apologetics aren’t biblical. Wrong! They’re massively biblical.

Catholic Apologists

anti-apologetics

Argument & Debate in Evangelism & Apologetics

argumentation in apologetics & evangelism

hostility to Catholic apologetics

St. Paul & debate

Previous Post

October 11, 2021

Did Pope Francis Rebuke Pelosi Re Abortion?

Next Post

October 12, 2021 Jesus vs. James White on Who Can be Saved

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz