Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Election Fraud: Conspiracy or Valid Concern? (vs. S. Greydanus)

Election Fraud: Conspiracy or Valid Concern? (vs. S. Greydanus)

Last updated on: December 10, 2020 at 3:18 pm by Dave Armstrong

Election Fraud: Conspiracy or Valid Concern? (vs. S. Greydanus) 2020-12-10T15:18:57-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Deacon Steven D. Greydanus stopped by my Facebook page to discuss this a bit. In 2016 he lost a $100 bet with me over the election (so did Sam Rocha). Steven’s words will be in blue.

*****

(If only I coulda bet you this year…)

Well, one disputes a bet on a poker game when it’s discovered that the opponent is cheating . . .

I would have / will abide by the Supreme Court’s decision, if it gets to that. That would be the basis of my paying up if I lost the bet. There is such a thing as voting / election fraud, just as there is such a thing as a cheater in poker. Third-world countries are well-familiar with it. I never would have thought it could happen here. But so it did. There is also such a thing as a real conspiracy (e.g., the plot to kill Lincoln, which involved several people).

When the Dems, however, claimed Trump was a treasonous Russian agent, they had four years, spending $48 million of our money, and they came up with zero evidence. Zilch, zip, nada. The statistical analysis being done regarding what has happened in past elections compared to Biden’s performance is quite compelling as well, on several fronts.

So if SCOTUS [the US Supreme Court] says there was mischief and various states have to make it right by virtue of legislative decisions, etc., will Democrats and other anti-Trumpers accept that? Will they then admit there is some substance to it? I accept whatever SCOTUS determines, because they are the only authority we have left in this mess that is nationwide.

If any court, at any level, says there is significant credible evidence of election fraud on a scale that could falsify the outcome in any state, I will begin to take the question seriously at that point.

So far the Trump administration and its allies have a virtually unbroken record of humiliating court losses—over 50 of them. (Their lone victory was on a procedural matter.)

When I say “humiliating,” I mean their suit being rejected “with prejudice,” and a Trump appointee, writing the unanimous opinion of an all-Republican judicial panel, finding that not only did they present no evidence, they presented no specific allegations.

Anyone can lose an election, and anyone can have a few unfair court losses, but to lose over 50 court cases as the incumbent challenging the election results takes a special brand of separation from reality.

I predicted weeks ago that if the Trump administration managed to appeal to the Supreme Court, they would most likely not take the case, but leave the obviously correct lower court ruling in place. If they did take a case, I predicted a clear rebuke, likely 9-0.

Any other outcome—even a narrow 5-4 victory of Thomas, Alito, and Trump’s three nominees—will be a priori evidence of at least some there there.

Not that I expect many Trump supporters to conclude the opposite if Trump’s unbroken losing streak on substantial suits and extraconstitutional maneuvers continues. As long as he says the election was stolen, they’ll believe him.

I will accept the verdict of the SCOTUS, as I have said over and over. That’s how the rule of law works.

Pollster Patrick Basham offers a completely different statistical-type argument, and I think it raises profound questions. I’d love to see you or any other liberal respond to it. Some highlights from the article:

Patrick Basham, founding director of the Democracy Institute, said Biden’s victory of Trump was ‘not statistically impossible, but it’s statistically implausible.’ . . .

According to Basham, there are a ‘dozen or more’ non-polling metrics that ‘have a 100% accuracy rate in terms of predicting the winner of the presidential election.’ . . .

‘If you look at the results, you see how Donald Trump improved his national performance over 2016 by almost 20 per cent.’ said Basham.

‘No incumbent president has ever lost a reelection bid if he’s increased his votes [total]. Obama went down by three and a half million votes between 2008 and 2012, but still won comfortably.’

Basham noted that Trump gained ground with minorities, Catholics and other groups.

‘If you look at those results, you see that Donald Trump did very well, even better than four years earlier, with the white working class,’ Basham said.

‘He held his own with women and suburban voters against all of most of the polling expectations, did very well with Catholics, improved his vote among Jewish voters.

‘He had the best minority performance for a Republican since Richard Nixon in 1960, doing so well with African-Americans, and importantly with Hispanics.’ . . .

He discussed a ‘historically low ballot rejection rate for absentee and mail-in ballots.’

‘Rejection rates, which in the primaries earlier this year were well into the double-digits and which historically have often been very, very high in these key swing states, or at least in the key swing counties, we’re seeing rejection rates of less than 1%, often very close to to zero,’ said Basham.

Note that in 2000, the Dems refused to accept the verdict of SCOTUS and talked about Bush being an illegitimate President his entire two terms. He ended up in the low 30s for approval: far lower than Trump.

Then again in 2016 they refused to accept the results and spent $48 million with the Mueller Investigation to find nothing whatsoever. Then they broke the law by spying against Trump (CIA and FBI). Hillary Clinton continues to say that Trump was illegitimate. She can say that but how dare any Republican say it about Biden! Then they tried a ridiculous impeachment that had no serious evidence at all. Now the goal is wholesale mockery and painting of Trump as merely a conspiracist nut.

And now they wanna lecture Republicans because we take seriously many hundreds of legal affidavits claiming there were illegalities and fraud?

One may argue that, okay, maybe it doesn’t overturn the election, but it sure as hell indicates something that we ought to be concerned about, for future elections and trust in the security of the election system.

Nothing ever seems to be done when Democrats break the law. Anything goes.

As long as he says the election was stolen, they’ll believe him.

As long as Hillary Clinton and a host of liberal hyper-partisans say the 2016 election was stolen, they’ll believe her and them.

As long as liberals say the 2000 election was stolen, they’ll believe them. Apparently no Republican President can be legitimate anymore. The last one was elder Bush, who left office in early 1993.

Legal scholar Alan Dershowitz is a Democrat and libertarian (no Trump Supporter at all). He’s one of very few Democrats who are objective enough to admit that something is, or at least may be seriously awry. In other words, this is not all “nothing.” The following excerpts are from the article, “Alan Dershowitz: There ‘certainly is probable cause’ to investigate claims of voter fraud” (Emma Colton, Washington Examiner, 12-6-20):

[Dershowitz] “There certainly is probable cause for investigating and looking further. Giuliani has made very serious accusations. The question is, which institution is designed, constitutionally, to look into it. Is it the state legislature? Is it the courts? Is the clock running in such a way that there won’t be time to look into this?

“I have proposed, for the future at least, the creation of a vote integrity panel, VIP, that would consist of former justices, judges, neutral non-partisan, that any complaint about an election, either before the election, during the election, or after the election, could go to this group which could then look into it because we know the media doesn’t give it a fair shake and we know that everybody else is partisan. The American public wants to know, is Giuliani correct, or isn’t he correct? I don’t know whether we’ll find that out in time for the meeting of the Electoral College votes.”

[Maria Bartiromo] “Alan, you said earlier about the Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania state we’re watching but also that we need evidence. Do you feel that Giuliani has been presenting evidence with all of these videos and these witness testimonies? You said he’s got 1,000 affidavits.”

[Dershowitz] “Yes. These are retail evidence that have to be determined to be true by cross-examination and witnesses. The core constitutional question that Ken [Starr] correctly pointed to is clearly state legislatures have the power before the voters vote to pick the electors. The unanswered constitutional question is do they have the power, state legislatures, to pick electors after the voters vote, after they conclude that the voters’ count has been in some way fraudulent or wrong. That is a constitutional question we do not answer to, and the Supreme Court may get to decide that question if a state legislature decides to determine who the elector should be and changes the electors from Biden to Trump. That will be the key constitutional question.”

Steven may very well respond further. I wanted to get this up for now. I will post any further exchanges.

I will endeavor to resist the temptation to wade into attempting to untangle your false equivalencies. My comment was to note my threshold for taking the question seriously. (A Dersh interview in the Washington Examiner was not my threshold.)

Immune to all contrary evidence as usual. Thanks for again (sadly) confirming that.

***

Photo credit: Nick Youngson [Blue Diamond Gallery / Creative Commons 3 – CC BY-SA 3.0 license]

***

Political & Ethical & Moral Issues

2020 election

2020 presidential campaign

2020 presidential election

American politics

American presidential election

Biden wins

cheating to win an election

Previous Post

December 9, 2020

Kwasniewski vs. Pope Francis Re "Fundamentalism"

Next Post

December 10, 2020 Seidensticker Folly #67: Atheism's Logical End: Nihilism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz