Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Reflections on Trump the “Arrogant” Alpha Male

Reflections on Trump the “Arrogant” Alpha Male

Last updated on: September 19, 2020 at 12:15 pm by Dave Armstrong

Reflections on Trump the “Arrogant” Alpha Male 2020-09-19T12:15:26-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of the big criticisms of Trump from the left and Never Trumpers and other critics not in either category is that he is so brash and arrogant, full of himself, etc. People who say this (by the millions) find him extremely offensive and off-putting.

I have no problem conceding that these are undeniable aspects of his personality, though I think the degree of sinfulness involved is debatable and greatly exaggerated by these critics. It’s not as if no other President or politicians has exhibited such traits: as if Trump is a singularly unique specimen.

But please join me in a thought-experiment for a moment, if you would. Think of the accusations and charges that Trump has had to endure on a daily basis for four years now. He’s supposedly a white supremacist, an anti-Semite, one who hates all immigrants and Mexicans and Muslims and women; one who supposedly mocks disabled people, who cares nothing for the poor and downtrodden; a treasonous agent of the Russian government; one who even (so we have recently been told, in the latest whopper, with all anonymous sources) hates the military and disrespects the war dead.

As just one representative example of the typical rhetoric, look at what Catholic writer Mark Shea has written about Trump (all taken from his blog, with recorded dates) throughout the three years of the endless Mueller investigation (all of which — it was concluded — had no basis whatsoever):

a guy who wants to invite Russian espionage against the US for the sake of personal power. (7-27-16)

When the Intel community is now treating him like a Russian mole, . . . it is reason to start talking about Treason. (2-13-17)

it was the President’s job, up till 1/20/17, to protect the US from treasonous crooks like Trump. (3-4-17)

[title] Traitor shares highly classified intel with Russia (5-16-17)

blabbed and bragged away extremely sensitive intel to Russian spies in an act so irresponsible that were he anybody but Donald Trump he would be instantly fired for incompetence or hanged for treason according to ex-intelligence officials. (5-18-17)

I propose voting for the party that will impeach and remove the most dangerous man we have ever placed in the White House–a party that, for all its faults, has not committed treason by handing intelligence to Russian spies in the very Oval Office, has not turned a blind eye to Russian meddling in our elections, and has not obstructed justice in investigating that. (2-23-18)

Trump stood right next to Putin and heard him confess with his own lips that he directed the Russian state to meddle in our elections. (7-18-18)

Shea seems to have shut up about Trump and Russia after July 2018: having finally regained his wits and realized (some folks are slow learners) what we all know now: that there was no collusion whatsoever between Trump and Russia. The Mueller investigation found exactly zero evidence of that. The crimes Manafort committed had absolutely nothing to do with collusion or Trump.

Just think of all the wasted energy and zeal that could have been channeled into something else like, I don’t know, maybe apologetics? And consider all of this misdirected hatred that could have been directed towards, um, Satan, the devil, rather than our President: whom Scripture invariably commands us to honor?

Without arguing those points now (and I have at length), these things are all absolute lies and falsehoods. Now, for those who agree — or at least partially agree — that they are falsehoods, think of what it would be like on a personal level to endure this constant attack. Could a person without a rather robust self-confidence be able to do so? I don’t think so: not along with continuing to accomplish so many things, as he has. “Walk a mile in a man’s shoes . . .”

One could note that saints were persecuted and they endured it without succumbing to these character defects. That’s true, but no one is claiming that Trump is a saint or that virtually any politicians come close to that exalted estate.

I would say that at this point in time, he is the one who is in the forefront of the battle against radical destructive, anti-traditional, anti-Christian, childkilling secularism. Whatever his character, that’s the position he is in, and millions of us who see the true nature of secularism support him for the sake of the cause for tradition.

Does that, therefore, make him “God’s man of the hour” or one “divinely appointed”? I don’t think that necessarily follows at all; nor do I think we can easily proclaim someone to be that. It’s known only to God. My own opinion is that it’s much more likely that God in His providence uses President Trump to accomplish many of His purposes (such as the pro-life cause), just as He used Cyrus to rebuild the temple and even Nebuchadnezzar in some ways, and how He used the sinners Moses, David, Matthew, Peter, and Paul to advance His purposes.

Could another man or woman have withstood the overwhelming, horrific onslaught of deliberate lies and attacks that he has endured? It’s hard to think of anyone who could. Envision, for example, a pious traditional Catholic like Sen. Rick Santorum in his position (had he won a presidential election). I think he would do much good in the office, but withstand all this avalanche of personal attacks and sheer mockery? No; not likely. I suspect that it would be the same for a virtuous, pious Protestant like, say, Mike Huckabee. How about Mike Pence (good solid evangelical that he is)? Maybe. He may have learned how to do it by now, having stood alongside Trump, and maybe he will if he gets elected in 2024.

But whoever could do it is mere speculation. We know that President Trump has withstood the attacks, and it is heroic and praiseworthy, whatever other real faults that man has (and he has many, as even his most avid supporters usually readily admit). President George W. Bush (whom I loved, and saw in person twice) was of this gentle nature, but we see what they did to him. By the end of his second term his approval rating was in the low 30s and he was a laughingstock.

That happened because of his deliberate decision not to fight back against the Democratic Lie Machine directed against him (as against all Republicans). So he kept his character intact, but he was utterly neutralized and neutered as an effective politician for pretty much his entire second term. Romney and McCain? Don’t even get me started with those two. Neither possessed the temperament to fight the forces of secularism; they were so used to compromising and being wishy-washy, they couldn’t imagine being champions for tradition: not against this sort of relentless, ruthless opposition.

Ronald Reagan comes closest to the “humble warrior” or suchlike who stood strong and still got good things done. Do you think the accusations of senility and loss of cognitive ability are new with Biden? It was all done to Reagan in the 80s. But then I would say that he was in office from 32-40 years ago, and a generation of increasingly radical and vehement secularism has proceeded since his time. Reagan used to meet Speaker of the House and Democrat Tip O’Neill for breakfast every week, for amiable discussion. They actually personally liked each other. Imagine Trump and Nancy Pelosi doing that!! The polarization today is nearly complete and invulnerable. Nor did Reagan succeed in much more than merely slowing the progress of relentless secularization down a little.

So the next time any orthodox Catholic (pro-life and in favor of moral and theological tradition) wants to trash and bash President Trump: particularly for his brashness, I humbly submit and suggest that perhaps they should also consider these aspects a bit.

***

Photo credit: gregroose (3-30-20) [Pixabay / Pixabay license]

***

Political & Ethical & Moral Issues

Previous Post

September 18, 2020

Reply to Anti-Catholic Chris Bayack vs. Steve Ray (Pt. I)

Next Post

September 19, 2020 Reply to Anti-Catholic Chris Bayack vs. Steve Ray (Pt. II)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz