Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Consecrated Virginity & Catholic “Both / And”

Consecrated Virginity & Catholic “Both / And”

Last updated on: June 5, 2026 at 11:57 pm by Dave Armstrong

Consecrated Virginity & Catholic “Both / And” 2026-06-05T23:57:10-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

1 Timothy 4:1-4 (RSV) Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by giving heed to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, [2] through the pretensions of liars whose consciences are seared, [3] who forbid marriage and enjoin abstinence from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. [4] For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving;

The Catholic Church doesn’t “forbid marriage” for anyone called by God to it, but is simply recognizing those who are already called by God to celibacy (1 Corinthians 7) as the class of people it wants for priests, because of their “undivided devotion to the Lord,” as Paul states (1 Cor 7:32-35).

To play in the NBA one usually has to be at least 6 feet tall. That’s not the NBA “forbidding” people to be short. It’s simply what is required to play in the NBA. To be in the military one has to be healthy, etc.

1 Corinthians 7:7-8, 17, 24, 38 I wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own special gift from God, one of one kind and one of another. [8] To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do. . . . [17] Only, let every one lead the life which the Lord has assigned to him, and in which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches. . . . [24] So, brethren, in whatever state each was called, there let him remain with God. . . . [38] So that he who marries his betrothed does well; and he who refrains from marriage will do better.

Matthew 19:11-12 . . . Not all men can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. [12] For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it.

The 1 Timothy 4 passage refers to the Gnostics and other similar groups, who forbade marriage as evil because they thought that all matter (including sexuality in marriage) was evil. Paul notes that food and marriage are “good” (1 Tim 4:4) because they were created by God. Catholics teach that marriage is a sacrament, and therefore gives grace.

This is not just “Catholic” interpretation of these verses. The Protestant Eerdmans Bible Commentary (aka New Bible Commentary) concurs, referring to “Gnostic and dualistic views that matter is evil and not created by God” (p. 1173) . Gordon D. Fee (p. 99) states that “In Corinth this kind of view about the End was apparently linked to Hellenistic dualism, which believed matter to be corrupt, or evil, and only spirit to be good.” John R. W. Stott (pp. 112-113) observes:

[S]ome teachers . . . have argued that sex and hunger are themselves unclean appetites, that the body itself is a nasty encumbrance (if not actually evil) . . . this Jewish aberration [he had cited the Essenes] came to be mingled with the dualism of Greek philosophy, and especially with incipient Gnosticism, which regarded matter as evil and despised the material creation. . . . we do not forget that according to Jesus and Paul some people are called to remain single . . . but these are special cases. The point is that celibacy and vegetarianism are not God’s general will for everybody . . .

Aída Besançon Spencer (pp. 105-106) mentions the Essenes, the cult of Artemis, the Gnostics, and the Montanists as examples of what St. Paul was condemning in 1 Timothy 4. N. T. Wright (p. 44) notes that “Paul could see that some would end up saying that sex itself is simply bad, so that ideally all people should be celibate.” R. Kent Hughes and Bryan Chapell (p. 107) refer in this context to the Essenes, and state that “the Greek culture of Ephesus had the seeds of second-century, gnostic dualism that regarded the human body and its functions as evil and taught that the godly must live above the physical.”

Thus, we see what Paul very likely had in mind, according to the seeming consensus of Protestant New Testament commentary. It was not the Catholic requirement for its priests (in the Latin rite) to be celibate, for the purpose of more focused concentration on serving God and their flocks (his teaching in 1 Corinthians 7), because consecrated virginity is not the same as the false notion that sex itself, or matter, are evil.

This is a classic instance of how the Catholic Church takes all of Scripture seriously; it doesn’t neglect certain portions because they may happen to be difficult, unpopular, or unfashionable. Consecrated virginity or celibacy is expressly sanctioned by Jesus (Matthew 19) and Paul (1 Corinthians 7). All of the disciples, most or all of the early apostles and Jesus Himself were celibate (Peter apparently agreed with his wife to live a celibate life), and we are commanded to imitate Jesus and Paul.

So why is it a controversy at all? We are simply applying those parts of Scripture, and celebrating a consecrated, sacrificial life, just like the one that St. Paul, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and many others lived. Why is that frowned upon? We get attacked for upholding celibacy and we get attacked for advocating sacramental, indissoluble marriage and having many children. We like married couples having lots of children, yet we get attacked for supposedly being “anti-sex.” When criticisms are irrational and self-contradictory to this ludicrous extent, one knows that something is awry in the accusers, not the accused.

The fact is that our outlook is precisely, comprehensively biblical: marriage is a sacrament and a celibate priesthood is also a sacrament (the characteristically biblical and Catholic “both / and” outlook). We don’t have to get legalistic and puritanical and be unbalanced; we rejoice in the pleasures of life, including physical pleasures, within proper moral boundaries. But we also embrace those who want to fully devote themselves to God by remaining unmarried, by vocation.

The fact that some give up good things in order to serve the Lord more wholeheartedly (1 Corinthians 7:32-35) does not mean that the good things cease to be good things (either in fact or in Catholic opinion). We’re not saying that priests, monks, and nuns are giving up a “bad thing.” They are good; that’s what it means to “sacrifice” in the first place! This comes straight from explicit teaching in St. Paul and also our Lord. It is really Spirituality 0101 or Bible 0101, yet for some odd reason so many Christians fail to grasp these elementary matters.

Why is there any controversy at all about it? Clearly, fads, fashions, and traditions of men have gotten mixed in with the plain revelation that is there for all to see. All Catholics are doing is abiding by the biblical (and particularly, the Pauline) model.

***

Photo credit: Saint Francis embracing Christ on the Cross (c. 1669), by Bartolomé Esteban Murillo (1617-1682) [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

***

Church (Ecclesiology)

Sexuality and Gender Issues

consecrated virginity

sacrament of matrimony

virginity

Previous Post

September 8, 2020

Seidensticker Folly #51: God and Praise, Part II

Next Post

September 9, 2020 Ratzinger “Banal” Quote: Traditionalist & Reactionary Misuse

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz