Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Objections Re the Catholic Ban on Contraception

Objections Re the Catholic Ban on Contraception

Last updated on: August 21, 2020 at 6:40 pm by Dave Armstrong

Objections Re the Catholic Ban on Contraception 2020-08-21T18:40:58-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a compilation of three Facebook posts on this topic, from 2-1-18, 6-7-18, and 2-21-19.

*****

Some Thoughts on Primitive Reproductive Biology and on the Catholic Church’s Rationale for Condemning Contraception

[from a combox underneath a share of one of my papers on Onan, at Professor of Moral Theology Janet E. Smith’s Facebook page]

Martin Luther (whatever his view of the biology was) seemed to understand the Catholic objection to it, when he wrote (as I cited): “Surely at such a time the order of nature established by God in procreation should be followed.”

Both Luther and John Calvin stated that contraception was the moral equivalent of murder, which may suggest (but not prove) that they held to the primitive biological notion about sperm. But it might also mean that in their understanding, preventing a life from coming into being was like murder, insofar as both things deprive a person (or potential person) of life. They both stop what would continue to be (or what would be with time and no interference) a human life; a person.

The Catholic belief in the wrongness of contraception doesn’t rest on the former false belief that the “man’s seed was already a person,” but rather, on the premise that contraception deliberately thwarts a potential new person coming into being. It’s not open to life. It’s “contralife.” That’s where the grave sin resides.

Biology was still very primitive at the time of Darwin, which is only 150 years ago. He was before even genetics. In any event, we don’t oppose contraception because we think it is a sort of “pre-abortion” (as if the sperm is a human being) — as Luther and Calvin appeared to believe — , but because it is fundamentally opposed to life and natural law. It unnaturally attempts to separate sex from procreation.

Our argument doesn’t fundamentally rely on biology, but rather, on the contralife will: which can be present, no matter what a person understands about biology. The ancients knew that intercourse and ejaculation is how children come about just as well as we do. And they had contraception just as we do. They knew that preventing ejaculation during the act of intercourse is what would prevent a child. That holds true whatever one understands about the actual biology of reproduction.

The Church doesn’t condemn sex during infertile times or after menopause. The sin comes in deliberately attempting to prevent a child that might be. There is no potential child in sex at infertile times, so we have no issue at all with that. It doesn’t violate natural law.

*****

Reply to Some Garden-Variety Objections to Catholic Opposition to Contraception

[I was answering a comment made underneath my article for National Catholic Register: “Contraception and ‘Anti-Procreation’ vs. Scripture”]

Q: “How can you dare tell a tired, weary, depressed, intimacy-needing married woman with seven children, who’s now on a non-abortifacient Pill, that she’s “anti-procreation,” but a celibate person—female or male—who takes a vow before God never to create even one child is “open to life”?”

A: This is what we call a false dichotomy. I can “dare” to tell her that deliberate thwarting of a possible conception and separation of the procreative and unitive functions of the sexual act are gravely sinful according to Catholic teaching: a violation of natural law. Abstinence for proper reasons (health / emotional / financial) is perfectly moral, and in accord with natural law and Catholic teaching (Humanae Vitae). One follows those laws by practicing Natural Family Planning. Having seven children (which is great) has no bearing whatever on whether a person can or might commit grave sin. They can. The celibate is “open to life” because they haven’t sought to overcome natural law in an anti-life, anti-procreation manner.

Q: “One surely answered God’s command to be fruitful; the other surely did not. That’s a fact. Undeniable. Yet guess which one we call anti-procreation?”

A: One was fruitful, but then sought to sin and to adopt an “anti-child” contraceptive mentality. The other was faithful to his or her calling, according to God’s will. God calls everyone to do what He intends for them. Undistracted devotion to God in celibacy (Paul in 1 Corinthians 7) [priests and religious] is one such calling.

Q: “Can’t we trust both? Can’t we praise both?”

A: The Catholic response was the one I just gave.

Q: “Can’t we quit judging both?”

A: One must make determinations whether sin has been committed, according to the Catholic (and natural law) standard and framework.

Q: “Can’t we quit quantifying/legalizing how to judge a good marriage or a good non-marriage?”

A: Non sequitur.

Q: “Heck, “We Just Won’t Get Married” might be an ironic, even logical, conclusion for millions who hear the post-hoc-ergo-propter-hoc, “We have four children because we are married.”

A: That would be the typical inane response from our increasingly secularized and irrational, hedonistic, nihilistic pro-death culture, yes.

*****

Why the Catholic Church Opposes Contraception: Simple “Nutshell” Explanation

In a less sophisticated understanding, Catholic opposition to contraception merely holds that:

children are good.

[marital] sex is good and wonderful.

sex leads to children being conceived, which is a wonderful thing.

The more the merrier: just as with most things we like, the more we have (money, good food, friends, etc.), the better.

There was a time when most of the people in the world thought children were great; therefore lots of them was an even greater thing. Today some of us still think children are great, but for most of even the “pro-children folks,” that only extends to two or three; beyond that is frowned upon and thought to be excessive.

And that is a sea change in human thought about children and parenthood. Those with a contraceptive mentality argue that this is a good development. We traditional Catholics think it is tragic and a great loss of understanding and blessing to the world.

I would place the Big Sea Change (if we are to pick one time) at the advent of the Pill c. 1960. That’s when the birth rates started drastically plummeting. And of course legal abortion in the US 13 years later, and in most other countries didn’t help things either. First, people were overjoyed that they could play God and prevent births. Then they wanted to play Satan and kill children already conceived.

Catholics aren’t obliged to have an infinite number of children, either, and we are allowed to plan according to approved NFP (for appropriate reasons; not no reason).

***

See many more articles on this topic and related ones on my Life Issues and Sexuality and Gender Issues web pages.

***

Photo credit: [public domain / Pikist]

***

Natural Family Planning

Previous Post

August 21, 2020

Viganò's Outrageous Lie Re Pope Benedict XVI & Tradition

Next Post

August 23, 2020 Does God Cause Miscarriages?: A Farcical Exchange

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz