My Blog Name Doesn’t Define or Confine Me

Last updated on: June 6, 2026 at 12:43 am by Dave Armstrong

My Blog Name Doesn’t Define or Confine Me 2026-06-06T00:43:04-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I Deal with a Very Wide Range of Topics in My Writing

Recently, in the controversies over a critique I dared make of someone else regarding pro-life issues, several people, in the midst of an avalanche of the usual tribalism and personal attacks (yawn), noted that this one article of mine had little or nothing to do with “biblical Catholicism.” They acted as if all I do is write stuff about “Bible and Catholicism.” Therefore, if I stepped out of that box for a little bit, somehow this was hypocritical or something, or dishonest labeling (or so the critiques seemed to assume; otherwise, why say such an odd thing?).

I’ve been a committed pro-lifer and activist since 1982: eight years before I became a Catholic and just one year after I got interested in apologetics. Up until that year, I had been the typical ignorant, apathetic, vaguely “pro-choice” person (based on mostly politically liberal input in my life). It’s a serious commitment of mine: much as the civil rights movement was for many people in the early 60s. I’ve been writing about it ever since, and so, recently, I have been addressing the conflicts between the so-called “new pro-life movement” and the more established one that I’ve been part of (which has been pilloried quite unjustly in certain quarters): sadly, by fellow pro-lifers and Catholics. It’s all part of who I am. Being in that movement also played a key role in my becoming Catholic. The link was the issue of contraception (the first issue in which I changed my mind, in a Catholic direction).

Sure, “Bible and Catholicism” is a big specialty of mine, and what I am most known for. I named my blog somewhat after my first book, A Biblical Defense of Catholicism. But the title, “Biblical Evidence for Catholicism” (here’s a bit of trivia for ya) was actually more inspired by Josh McDowell’s book, Evidence That Demands a Verdict: which had a huge influence on me, in inspiring me to take up apologetics in 1981. And that book was entirely historical apologetics, not biblical.

The titles of my first book and my website actually display some of my subtle “tweaking” and semi-provocative humor (which regular readers of mine are well familiar with). I knew that it would cause some anti-Catholic types of Protestants to blow a gasket, because the last two things they associate together are “Bible” and “Catholicism.” So that’s me puncturing through their false dichotomies.

Truth be told, I’m actually more interested in Church history and history of doctrine, than in “Bible and Catholicism.” Development of doctrine is my favorite topic and reading Cardinal Newman on that topic was what persuaded me of the truth of Catholicism. But (my luck) very few care about that topic. My conversion had nothing whatever to do with “biblical evidence for Catholicism.” It was all history and moral theology and arguments about ecclesiology: especially infallibility (which I absolutely despised before my conversion).

I started writing biblical defenses of Catholicism after my conversion in order to explain to my Protestant friends why I changed my mind. I took my cue and model from a book that I love: The Faith of Our Fathers by James Cardinal Gibbons. The most well-known version of my conversion story (in Pat Madrid’s book, Surprised by Truth) illustrates this quite well. It’s all about moral theology and historical arguments; not at all about “Bible and Catholicism.” And historical topics remain my favorite topics to this day.

Don’t get me wrong: I really love the biblical stuff, too, because I love the Bible. I wouldn’t write so much on that theme if I didn’t (because almost always I write about things that I enjoy). I’m just making the point that this doesn’t define or confine me. I am about much more than that, in the scope of my writing. Anyone who peruses the titles of my 50 books and my 3000+ online articles and 50 or so separate web pages will quickly realize that.

I even have extensive sections about holistic health and music. My one non-apologetics book is about classic rock music, because music is another huge love of my life. I loved music and history a dozen years before I gave much thought at all to theology or even God (I didn’t read the Bible till I was 18). I even majored in music at the great high school in Detroit (Cass Technical) that I went to (where the Four Tops, Diana Ross, Jack White, and jazz violinist Regina Carter also attended).

To give people not as familiar with my work an idea of the range of my writing: I have an extensive web page on the Church fathers, and have compiled three books of their material (one / two / three). I’ve put together The Quotable Summa Theologica (St. Thomas Aquinas). I’ve edited three quotations books of St. John Henry Cardinal Newman (one / two / three), and others devoted to Chesterton, John Wesley, and Catholic mystics and contemplatives. Three of those were published by “official” publishers (as 21 of my books have been; the rest I did on my own).

I have very extensive web pages about atheism and philosophy and science; about Romantic theology and Catholic conversion, the life issues, and sexuality. Anyone who follows me at all knows of the range of topics that I write about. I’ve written two entire books in response to John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion (one / two) and two books about Martin Luther (along with extensive pages about Calvinism and Lutheranism). I’ve even written one of the few books that compare and contrast Orthodoxy and Catholicism (with co-author, Byzantine Catholic Fr. Daniel Dozier).

I have web pages about Jews and Judaism, heresies, ecumenism, and the inquisition, Crusades, and Catholic “scandals”; also about liberal theology, Catholic reactionaries, and politics and social teaching; even Christmas.

I used to maintain the largest web pages online about C. S. Lewis, Cardinal Newman, and G. K. Chesterton, but stopped those recently, because they were too difficult to maintain (and Google pretty much replaced the function of such pages, anyway). 15 years ago, they were all prime locations for anyone online looking for material from these great men, and were noted as such by people like, e.g., Dale Ahlquist of the American Chesterton Society, and the men who started up the Newman Reader website with all his works. My Lewis page was cited more than once as a major source in the evangelical magazine, Christianity Today.

So it’s a very odd comment, that these people have made. If they want to run me down, the least they can do is learn a minimal amount of information about what is actually contained in my website before making such a comment. But that is the problem so often today, online: folks opining before they think much or research that which they profess to know something about.

Titles of websites are sort of like actors being typecast in a role. People love a particular role (think of, e.g., Edith Bunker or John-Boy Walton, or Fonzie) and start to think that this is all the actor or actress is about. And they hate that. Some never get out of it and their careers basically end. Musicians (composers) also detest being put into one box or style. They like to feel that they are always developing, and have a lot more to offer than one style only. I’m the same. I’d like to think that folks who read my stuff are aware of how many different topics I’ve covered, and that I am not only the “Bible and Catholicism” guy.

It’s not that big of a deal, but it irked me and I was bored tonight, so I wrote about it (trying to get myself tired, now at 1:30 AM), because I usually write about what interests me at any given point of time. And (to end on a positive note) it was also an opportunity to let people know of the wide variety of Catholic and general Christian topics they can find on my large website: lots more than just “biblical evidence for Catholicism.” The title reflects a big emphasis (no question), but not the totality of what I do.

***

(originally 8-5-17 on Facebook)

***

Catholic Apologetics

Personal Page

biblical evidence for Catholicism

blog name

Catholic apologist Dave Armstrong

Catholic author Dave Armstrong

Catholic editor Dave Armstrong

Dave Armstrong

Previous Post

August 23, 2020

Does God Cause Miscarriages?: A Farcical Exchange

Next Post

August 24, 2020 Dialogue #6 w 1P5 Columnist Timothy Flanders

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz