Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

davearmstrong

I Excoriated Society-Wide Sexual Abuse in 2007

Last updated on: June 18, 2020 at 6:43 am   by Dave Armstrong

I Excoriated Society-Wide Sexual Abuse in 2007 2020-06-18T06:43:47-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[originally posted on 11-17-17]

***

I’m delighted to see liberals and/or feminists starting to do the same thing now. The fact of these recent revelations shouldn’t surprise anyone in the slightest: not one bit. The only surprise is: why did it take liberals and mainstream (largely liberal and secular) society so long to finally say “enough is enough“? Could it be, it’s because the very sexual revolution that liberals have championed for so long, has arguably played a key role in bringing these scandals and outrageous behaviors (in terms of being so widespread) about?

*

And they say that conservatives (like me) supposedly care so much less about “women’s issues” and that liberals are so much more compassionate and concerned, and treat women as equals? That’s all exploded to hell now, ain’t it? Sexual sin knows no political boundaries. It’s a human sin problem, and last I checked, we are all fallen creatures, with concupiscence and lust that we must overcome by God’s grace. Liberals were ecstatic about Judgment Day Roy Moore (i.e., keeping the myth alive that this is supposedly more of a conservative and “Christian hypocrisy” / “holier than thou” problem), and then, lo and behold, the Senator Al Franken scandal arose . . . I must say: I love the irony and comedic timing there.

*

All of a sudden, now 70-something liberals like Jeff Greenfield (whom I have liked as a newsman through the years) become morally courageous (with Bill Clinton safely out of office and Hillary defeated and irrelevant) and say that Bill Clinton is a sexual predator? Welcome to the club, Jeff! Of course, we conservatives have been saying that since before Monica Lewinsky: all the way back to Gennifer Flowers in 1992 (that’s 25 years, by my math). We were mocked and pilloried (the “vast right-wing conspiracy” routine); that is, till the blue dress appeared, and till Clinton admitted to at least the Lewinsky shenanigans. Where was all the vaunted, self-proclaimed liberal “superior” concern for women and equal treatment, back then, and for the intervening 25 years? Radical feminist icon Gloria Steinem defended The Zipper against all the allegations in 1998, in the New York Slimes.

 

I wrote almost ten years ago, when the Catholic sex scandals were swirling around (which I immediately condemned in no uncertain terms), that this was universal in society. I documented how Protestants and Orthodox and institutions like the public schools had their own sex scandals, and said it was in every other sector of society, too, so that if only the Catholic Church is scrutinized, people will be allowing many other victims to suffer.

 

Bingo (to use some Catholic lingo)! Now we have Hollywood (that surprises anyone??!!) and national politicians (that does, too?) and the press (Halperin) being exposed for the same garbage.

 

The latest scandals all over the place also show very clearly that it’s obviously not a problem confined to men who are supposed to be celibate by profession (priests). The Catholic scandals largely had to do with homosexual promiscuity and abuse of young men; but the current ones (at least those we are hearing about) deal mostly with heterosexual promiscuity and immorality.

*

I wrote in my own combox, under an article about Protestant, Orthodox, and Jewish sex scandals, on 6 April 2008: (italics and bolding added presently)

 

I refuse to sit by and accept the myth that these horrors only occur in Catholic circles (since that is all we hear about in the media). It’s just not true.

I utterly condemn the heinous sins and at the same time tell the truth about where they are occurring (and that is everywhere, pretty much). If we pretend that it only happens with priests, then we are enabling the perpetrators to commit even more crimes, as we put our heads in the sand.

In other words, pointing out the severe bias of the media is not helping the abuse continue; it is the pretense of “Catholic only” that does that, because then it can occur in all these other places, and folks aren’t even aware of it (which is exactly what the molesters and pedophiles like: safe anonymity).

 

Now, in November 2017, society is starting to wake up. How many thousands of victims could have been spared these past ten years, if folks had stopped pretending that it was only a problem in the Catholic Church, or that saintly, equal-rights-for-all bleeding-heart liberals (unlike those wicked conservative bigots and woman-haters) would never ever mistreat women and use and abuse them as a result of the so-called “privilege” of their power and riches?

*

Again, in my blog post, “Wisconsin, Irish, German, and Other Catholic Sexual Abuse Scandals: Collection of Factual, Objective Links” (dated 4-21-10), I linked (in the final section) to several papers that contended for the same thing: the society-wide nature of these sexual problems. That observation appeared to fall on deaf ears in our society till now. And so, in the meantime, that many more lives were harmed and altered forever (many literally ruined) by our society’s unwillingness to face the facts. Here are some of those articles I linked to, with excerpts:

“Sexual abuse is society’s problem, too” (Phil Lawler, Catholic Culture, 25 March 2010); excerpts:

. . . take the public schools. When an accusation was lodged against the history teacher, a generation ago, was he prosecuted? Not likely. Far more often he was quietly let go, and eventually found a job teaching in another school–just as priests were allowed to work in another parish. . . .

It wasn’t just the Church. Society as a whole chose to avert its eyes and cover up the evidence of scandalous conduct. Now that the Church has been under fire for a decade or more, it’s time to broaden the inquiry. What other institutions were guilty, and why? What other institutions need reform? . . .

For years now we have been talking about sexual abuse as a problem for the Catholic Church, and that it certainly is. But it’s a problem outside the Church as well, and that problem should now be addressed.

“Rabbi calls media coverage of Church abuse scandal one-dimensional” (Catholic News Agency, 7 April 2010); excerpt:

A lot of sex abuse involving children is going on, the rabbi noted. “It’s not simply a Catholic problem.”

I even found one article that (almost prophetically) discussed the Hollywood director and child rapist Roman Polanski in conjunction with the Catholic scandals: “Dominic Lawson: The Pope is vilified, Polanski indulged” (Independent, 19 April 2010; see more about Lawson). Excerpts:

Polanski has not been doing the usual TV interviews that accompany critical acclaim. He is under house arrest in his Swiss chalet, fighting the attempts of a California court to extradite him for the sexual abuse of a 13-year-old girl, Samantha Geimer, in 1977.

The world of film – indeed, of art in general – regards this (Polanski’s arrest, that is, not his abuse of a 13-year-old girl) as a scandal. This attitude was most clearly evident in the remark of the Hollywood actress Whoopi Goldberg, who last year defended him with the observation, “I know it wasn’t rape-rape”. With this remarkable neologism, Goldberg gave a new gloss to the old line (usually uttered by men) of “she said no, but she meant yes”.

Geimer’s testimony to the grand jury of the Los Angeles Supreme Court therefore bears repetition. She told the court how the then 44-year-old director plied her with the drug Quaalude mixed with champagne at the home of Jack Nicholson, and then, ignoring her befuddled requests that she wanted to “go home”, began to molest her. Polanski, obviously much less befuddled, repeatedly asked her if she was on the pill; not satisfied with the clarity of her response, he buggered her. . . .

I had always imagined that it was people who raped children, rather than organisations, but perhaps Prof Dawkins is not so much interested in bringing men to book for their abuse of children, as the Catholic Church for the opinions it propagates. In fact this was made clear – Dawkins is at all times wonderfully lucid – in his book The God Delusion, published in 2006. He wrote then that “we live in a time of hysteria about paedophilia, a mob psychology that calls to mind the Salem witchhunts of 1692”. Dawkins went on: “The Roman Catholic Church has borne a heavy share of such retrospective opprobrium … I dislike the Catholic Church, but I dislike unfairness even more and I can’t help wondering whether this one institution has been unfairly demonised over this issue, especially in Ireland and America.”

. . . there is also a similarity between Polanski’s behaviour and that of the sexually predatory priest. In both cases the abuse was one of a position of power. That is much more obvious in the case of the clergy: especially in a country such as Ireland, where the constitution of the Republic itself gave them “special” authority. They had, in effect, absolute power, which was not just (as Acton observed) absolutely corrupting, but which also intimidated their victims into acquiescence.

Similarly, the world-famous film director fully understood the power he had over a 13-year-old would-be starlet, whose pictures he had promised to take for a future edition of French Vogue. It is almost the oldest story in Hollywood, but none the less disgusting for that; the defence of “she wanted it, really” would not impress the cultural world if the proposer of that eternal exculpation were a man without artistic pedigree.

Just as it was outrageous for the Catholic Church, at any level, to put the burnishing of the reputation of its priesthood ahead of the sufferings of children, so those who put their faith in artists should realise that they too have no special claim to be beyond good and evil.

So, I tried to do my share to expose the society-wide sexual coercion going on: ten years ago and seven years ago.  I’m very glad to see that finally the message is gaining traction: among all political perspectives, so that at long last, instances of this monstrous behavior can be decreased. Polanski was wildly cheered at a recent Hollywood awards show. Maybe now he won’t be anymore. That’s progress.

Now, we see liberals condemning Bill Clinton’s behavior: 25 years late, but better late than never (though they had no problem nominating his ultra-abuse-enabling wife). And we see Democrat Senators giving fellow Democrat Senator and pervert Al Franken no quarter. That’s new. And that means that (thank God) we have an opportunity to make some huge and long overdue changes in what our society permits, as regards [mostly] powerful men and their [mostly] female sexual victims.

***

Photo credit: US Air Force photo / ad [URL / public domain]

***

Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals

Sexuality and Gender Issues

Al Franken

Bill Clinton

Bill Cosby

chauvinism

dirty old men

enablers

feminism

Harvey Weinstein

Hillary Clinton

Jeffrey Epstein

Juanita Broaddrick

Kathleen Willey

Kevin Spacey

Mark Halperin

misogyny

Paula Jones

pedophiles

perverts

rape

Roy Moore

serial abusers

sex scandals

sexual abuse

sexual coercion

sexual harassment

sexual power

sexual predators

treatment of women

Previous Post



June 17, 2020

Mary's Perpetual Virginity: Bombshell from Matthew 1:25

Next Post



June 18, 2020 Cardinal Newman on the Bodily Assumption of Mary


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who asked Jesus, "What is truth?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Caiaphas Pilate Nicodemus Herod

Books by This Author Books by Dave Armstrong

See All Titles »

Related posts from Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Catholic "Wicked Married Sex"?: 4th Reply to Sean...

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

2nd Reply to Anglican Sean Luke on Catholicism...

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

History of Required Celibacy Disproves Catholicism?

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

“PAGAN” Halloween & Christianity

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube