Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Ultra-Hypocritical James Swan Insultapalooza Post

Ultra-Hypocritical James Swan Insultapalooza Post

Last updated on: May 6, 2020 at 12:23 pm by Dave Armstrong

Ultra-Hypocritical James Swan Insultapalooza Post 2020-05-06T12:23:30-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

[photo source]

***

Anti-Catholic Reformed Protestant polemicist James Swan put up “The Beggars All Insultapalooza Post” which documents some insults (and true statements) made about him. He included four of my comments (all of which are quite true and easily able to be massively defended and documented):

James Swan Bolsters His Reputation as a Dense Amateur Church Historian and Hypocritical Nitpicker Yet Again.

So let Swan play his games and spend his time on trifles and stupid stuff.

But a raving anti-Catholic like Swan has no such interest in unity and finding common ground. He can”t even figure out that Catholics are fellow Christians.

Occasionally I expose him for what he is: an inveterate liar when it comes to Catholicism and Catholic apologists.

As per his usual policy, I am not named, because on his site I am He Who Shall Never Be Named. Yet in “code” in comments, oblique reference is made to me by “Austin”: “Some of my favorite insults have come from our mutual friend (Mr. Socrates himself). I actually wish he would self publish a quote book of his own insults. Now THAT would sell.”

The “Socrates” thing comes from part of the former URL for my website: “socrates58”. Then Swan gives his opinion: “Austin, those statements aren’t insults, they’re ‘apologetics.’ The statements are meant to demonstrate creative wit- like Chesterton.”

Now, one would have to know the background to recognize the huge, massive hypocrisy in all this. I’ve been dealing off and on with this guy since 2002. Swan talking about charitable and substantive discourse (as if he does this) is sort of like, say, Don Rickles condemning the comedic insult, or a giraffe condemning long necks, or a pig going after mud.

I (and many other Catholics and Catholic apologists) have been the recipient of mountains of insults from this guy, just as I have from many active anti-Catholics. This is largely how they argue; hence, I document their tactics to show them for what they are (just as one of my comments about Swan above stated). I’ve explained why I do this, here and many other times.

Don’t even start in with the criticisms (that always are made in threads like this) about “why do you pay him attention?” etc. I am explaining why. There is always a purpose to everything I do, and it’s reflected upon and thought-out, believe me. I compiled a lengthy post documenting Swan’s infinite number of lies and insults about me through the years. Here are just the categories of the insults (with many entries under each one):

Charges of My Allegedly Lousy, Incompetent, Dishonest, or Nonexistent “Research”

Claims of My Supposed Butchering of, or Complete Neglect of Context

Swan Doesn’t Take Me “Seriously” (Despite His Obsessive 150 Papers or So About My Work)

Accusation of My Allegedly Unethical, Cynical Editing of Opponents’ Words

My Alleged Profound Narcissism

Accusation of Constant Dishonest Tampering With My Own Blog Posts

Charge That I Am Dishonest and/or Cynically Revise Past History

Accusation That I Am Unethically Motivated by Filthy Lucre, Without Principle

Insinuation That I Am Not a Legitimate Catholic Apologist (I Simply “Proclaimed” Myself to Be One)

And note that this paper was a shortened version of a longer one that I had removed. But Swan kept up his hypocritical, sanctimonious lying, and so I brought it back again in an abridged form, to set the record straight (for any of you serious students of anti-Catholic integrity and discussion “method” out there).

I did precisely the same regarding my documentation of his most famous and notorious insult of yours truly: that I am literally mentally ill; entitled, “Am I a Psychotic Madman? Diagnoses from Reformed Protestant Anti-Catholic Polemicist James Swan.” I put it up, later took it down, then because he continued the insults and acted as if he had made none, I put it up again (and now it will remain up, indefinitely).

I won’t bother to quote that. Go read it if you don’t believe me. I just wanted to note that these statements are out there as a matter of record. Some remain to this day online in various places. Others were removed for butt-covering purposes, without the slightest hint of true repentance.

Even here there has to be additional hypocrisy. It’s Swan’s stock-in-trade. If anyone dares merely state that Martin Luther (whom he writes about a lot) suffered from serious depression, or possibly was bipolar, Swan throws a fit and makes out as if this is the most outrageous thing in the history of the world, and perfectly irrelevant. Yet many good Luther historians (of all stripes) make the same claim, as I have documented:

Luther’s Projection of His Depression & Crises Onto St. Paul [6-1-06]

Did Luther Suffer from Recurring Depression? [7-4-07]

Was Luther a Neurotic? Protestant Biographers Say Yes [4-28-10]

But say that ol’ Dave Armstrong is a “psychotic” and “not quite right” and that I am supposedly a profound “narcissist” and all the other sewer scum lies that Swan and his fellow anti-Catholic cronies throw out regularly, in public, with regard for neither charity nor truth; well, that’s perfectly acceptable!

I will always note the double standard and document how anti-Catholics “argue.” Don’t follow these guys. They show their true stripes by their low ethical standards and even lower reasoning abilities. Jesus said, “the good tree produces good fruit” and “you will know them by their fruits.” This ain’t good fruit, folks. Lies never are. They come from the pit of hell, from the father of lies: Satan himself.

***

As I said, there is a long history here. Swan does not regard us as Christians, and regularly lies about us personally and about our belief system. That calls for some necessary firmness and harshness in reply (this is the background), just as Jesus did with the Pharisees and Paul did with various errors and those who promulgated them, and with liars and those with wild tongues.

It’s impossible for anyone to understand the dynamics of what Swan does, and what his opponents do, who starts out saying, “I have no idea who this guy is.”

I freely grant that these anti-Catholics are my brothers in Christ. They do no such thing with me or Catholics who follow the Church’s teachings, and that is why no real discussion with them is possible.

All that said, obviously there are Catholics, too, who shoot off at the mouth and say dumb or untrue things about Protestants, and I have always condemned that. In fact, the first statement Swan cited in his post, I deleted from my site, because it was excessive and had “anti-Protestant” elements which I do not countenance. And it was made by a friend of mine.

I’m consistent in my ethical standards.

Most Protestants regard us as Christians. It’s only a tiny fringe minority that are anti-Catholic, and Swan is among them. I primarily oppose anti-Catholicism. I defend Catholic teachings where they differ from Protestant, of course, but it is in a far different spirit than these guys exhibit, because for them, we are in spiritual darkness.

***

(originally 2-17-15 on Facebook)

***

Previous Post

May 6, 2020

James Swan Attacks My 1991 Paper (Calvin & Bucer)

Next Post

May 6, 2020 Phil Lawler's Mythical Private Letter (Unfruitful Discussion)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz