Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Does Pope Francis Have “Foot-in-the-Mouth” Disease?

Does Pope Francis Have “Foot-in-the-Mouth” Disease?

Last updated on: June 6, 2026 at 12:42 am by Dave Armstrong

Does Pope Francis Have “Foot-in-the-Mouth” Disease? 2026-06-06T00:42:24-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Reflections on the hysteria, irrationality, and fanaticism of the anti-Francis mentality, from 1-22-15 — originally on Facebook.

*****

I haven’t found yet where he is at fault in these 10 million clueless accusations thrown at him (certainly not in any major way). People can say that I simply defend him no matter what if they wish. I was accused of the same with regard to St. John Paul the Great, too. Nothing new under the sun. I’ve done the research and made the arguments; including writing an entire book about it. Anyone is welcome to try to overthrow them, rather than simply say, “well, hey, ten of my friends think his foot is permanently in his mouth, too!”

***

Give the devil his due. I think Satan has been extremely clever in bringing about this state of affairs where the Holy Father is relentlessly trashed and made an object of suspicion and disdain even from otherwise perfectly orthodox Catholics. It’s a diabolical masterstroke of great genius. And we Catholics are equally stupid, dumb, and imbecilic in falling for this tactic and strategy; enthusiastically volunteering to be dupes and pawns and useful idiots of the devil in his design of mocking and weakening the Catholic Church and its witness to the world, and message of hope.

***

He’s a straight shooter. He’s not this remote, super-pious figure. He speaks in normal, vernacular terms, so people can better relate to him. This is what St. Paul taught: “I have become all things to all men,” and what Vatican II urged all Catholics to do.

***

And the stupid, clueless criticisms of the pope’s statements can be criticized as both stupid and scandalous. Not every public statement he makes is infallible in the first place. Most of them are not.

***

If someone doesn’t like my (or anyone else’s) defenses of the pope (and to me the defenses are perfectly plausible and sensible), they can go and knock themselves out showing that they are invalid, point-by-point. But no one ever wants to do that, because that takes work and actual thinking, rather than the easy way out of the quick accusation, moaning and groaning, simply parroting the gossip of others, and furthering the false narrative about the Holy Father. Anything but actual rational analysis and interacting with different points of view. I’m sick to death of it by now . . .

***

Most of the trumped-up, pseudo-controversies come down to:

mere style,

genre,

rhetorical devices in response to others.

The misinterpretations come from reading him out of context and not taking into account #1-3 above.

***

I was already dissenting against what is likely to be in his encyclical about global warning even before it was published (which is perfectly fine because it’s not a “faith and morals” issue). That alone puts the lie to the cynical characterization that I never disagree with anything the pope writes or says. In the past I’ve disagreed with popes (to some extent) on capital punishment.

***

I like this pope and feel good about his personality not because I “have” to but because he is a likable and cool guy! Period. I have defended him against bum raps, and every time I set out to examine the latest supposed “controversy” I have found that it was ultimately groundless. I can’t change what my experience has been . . .

***

I mock stupidity where it is found. If people want to want to run down the pope, it is quite appropriate for me to run down dumb and stupid (and inexcusable) reasons for misinterpreting what the pope says. All people had to do in this case was read the transcript in context and then cease the idiotic comments for a change. Of course people will be offended if they hold a view that I characterize as “stupid.” That’s to be expected. It doesn’t follow that I don’t call a spade a spade. I didn’t take this job to win a popularity contest.

I defended Pope St. John Paul II, over the Assisi conferences and the kissing the Koran incident. I had to wrangle with self-described “traditionalists” all the time who ran him down. Robert Sungenis has attacked John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI as rank liberals, and I defended both. Nothing new there. I recently defended Pope Benedict XVI and his Summorum Pontificum against “traditionalists” who wanted to give up on liturgical reform.

***

I’ve written a book and a bunch of papers giving defenses of )ope Francis. They are there to serve Catholics. if someone is troubled, they should give my papers a shot. I’ve done the hard work (and am taking arrows as usual), and I see thousands of people who can’t even give the pope the courtesy of reading a paragraph to get the entire context of what he said.

***

Someone asked me: “Is any criticism allowed without being called stupid?”

Yes, of course: if it is a thoughtful, rational criticism made with full knowledge of what the thing is in the first place, that is being blasted. You guys in effect call the pope stupid over and over, as if he doesn’t know basic theology or the slightest thing about being a good pastor. Many today lecture him like some snot-nosed child. Yet if I call you out on it and use some strong (but absolutely justified) language I am Attila the Hun and Vlad the Impaler.

What is stupid is (for whoever does this) to not read a paragraph, to make any attempt to understand the basic point that the pope is making before lashing out at him in public, with many people making fools of themselves. That is STUPID: S, T, U, P, I, D. It is on the level of basic interpretation of words, and (far more tragically) in terms of spreading a scandal that is no scandal at all: making Catholics look totally ridiculous, as if we can’t read.

What I call “dumb and stupid” is this particular practice of not even reading properly, and then going out and saying asinine things about the Holy Father. It has to stop, and soon. If people don’t protest against it it will continue to get worse. It’s way out of hand already. The “rabbits” fiasco is perhaps the most ridiculous I’ve seen yet: in a long string of these ludicrous tempests in a teapot. The devil is laughing so hard over the stupidity of Catholics doing this again and again, that he must be crying and wetting his pants (if he wears them). It’s one of the most ingenious plots he has devised yet, to divide Catholics and make us look ridiculous to the world.

I was specifically referring to lashing out about the “rabbits” comment without even understanding the perfectly legitimate, orthodox, Catholic point that the pope was making. My words which had to do with the pope being taken out of context over and over, are themselves now being taken out of context (the same error repeated) [i.e., in the original Facebook thread], thus dramatically helping to prove my point. Critics of the pope need to read and think a lot better than they have been doing. It’s pathetic.

***

The only way to objectively approach the matter (given the “pro” and “con” views out there) is to grapple with defenses of what he says, such as what I do: on a case-by-case basis: to actually discuss the thing[s] and not merely mouth the objection that the pope supposedly has perpetual foot-in-the-mouth disease.

The latest thing is the “rabbits” controversy. If someone thinks I have not plausibly defended him, and shown that the objections are groundless, then by all means they should show all of us why and how. No one else has yet been willing to do so. I’m happy to let my readers read thoughtful, cogent presentations on both sides of the issue and make up their own minds as to whether the Holy Father has done anything wrong in this instance. Here’s where I wrote about it:

Pope Francis and Catholics Reproducing Like “Rabbits” (+ Facebook discussion) [1-21-15]

“Irresponsible” Pope Francis? (Woman Who Had Seven C-Sections) [1-23-15]

Pope Francis: 7 C-Sections is “Irresponsible” (Group Discussion) [1-23-15]

***

One can also say (as I would), “who gives a fig anymore what the liberal media thinks in the first place?” It will always distort Catholic and other Christian and conservative and traditional and pro-life thought, no matter what. So why worry about it so much? Just speak truth and let the chips fall where they may. Biblically speaking, those who are supposed to accept these truths will, by God’s grace. Those who will not to, will not.

Good grief. If I were always this concerned about how my writings would be received, I’d never write anything. I’d have permanent writer’s block, trying to please and appease men all the time.

***

Related Reading

Replies to Critiques of Pope Francis (Dave Armstrong) [170 of my own articles]

Pope Francis Defended: Resources for Confused or Troubled Folks [223 articles from others]

***

Papacy & Infallibility

Lost Shepherd. The Francis Feud

Pope Francis & dissidents

Pope Francis and the media

Theological Liberalism

Previous Post

May 12, 2020

John 20:22-23 & Formal Absolution (vs. Steve Hays)

Next Post

May 13, 2020 Bible on Faith, Works, and Judgment (vs. Jason Engwer)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz