Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Reply to Unfair Criticisms of Trump Re Coronavirus

Reply to Unfair Criticisms of Trump Re Coronavirus

Last updated on: April 7, 2020 at 11:47 pm by Dave Armstrong

Reply to Unfair Criticisms of Trump Re Coronavirus 2020-04-07T23:47:33-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

These replies, amounting eventually to a general and multi-faceted defense, started when I read a Facebook post from one of my Canadian cousins who is very dear to me (I am half-Canadian; my father was born there) . . . expressing Canadian anger over Trump ordering a company (3M) to stop selling N95 masks to Canada.

*****

I will temporarily suspend my resolution to not talk politics during Lent. :-) Only for you . . .

I’d really like to understand your thinking and why you (and at least two more of my cousins) are angry about this. I just read from an article with today’s date:

The U.S. is facing a dire shortage of N95 face masks, and they are only going to be more difficult to find as COVID-19 cases keep accelerating and manufacturers struggle to keep up with skyrocketing demand.

Major retailers, including Home Depot, [have] stopped selling these masks in store in order to free up more inventory for health care workers and those working in high-risk environments; smaller sellers with limited supply are running prices through the roof; and the federal government has nearly depleted its stockpile of N95s as well as other personal protective equipment (PPE).

So this is our situation. We have a severe shortage of these masks: needed especially by all the selfless health care workers.

As of an hour ago, we have 7,152 deaths from coronavirus, and 277,953 cases. Canada (as you have pointed out on my own page) has far fewer cases and deaths (188 and 12,545). By my math that is 38 times fewer deaths in Canada and 22 times fewer cases.

Because of this, we have a severe shortage of medical supplies, including these masks. Now, I’m sure that that will change soon, because lots of people are cranking them out, just as the Willow Run plant near us [metro Detroit] cranked out the bombers that helped win World War II. We’ll get it done, and it won’t be long. Then I say, send them all around the world to whomever needs them.

Once we get a handle on our own severe crisis and have adequate supplies, I’m quite sure we will send you whatever you need. No one in the history of the world has helped other countries as much as we have: not even close. We even do that with countries who tried to devour us in a world war (Japan, Germany). Mark my words: when we are under control, Canada will get all she wants from us, no questions asked.

But right now, in our state of national emergency, we have these dire shortages, and so are not exactly in a position where we can help others with the very medical supplies that we are dangerously short of, costing even more lives, for sure. Probably soon, when our pandemic winds down, we can help you, when your numbers start rapidly rising (as they likely will, but I pray not), but not now in the midst of it.

So in this present dire situation for the US, you are mad about one of our companies selling you these masks, so they can make more profit? That’s not the view of Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks and no conservative Republican (who is helping to produce many thousands of these masks himself). He stated four days ago about 3M, the company in question (i.e., before this current controversy happened):

“3M lists all its distributors online, the ones buying and selling these things, and these distributors are making as much money as they possibly can. It’s wrong, it’s criminal,” Cuban said in the interview. “It’s operating like an illegal drug market, not a legitimate market. I get wanting to make millions of dollars, but people are dying.”

You say you helped us after 9-11, and so you did, and we are grateful, as we are about your military partnership on many occasions as well. But I don’t see how this is analogous to the situation today at all. Saying you helped us then, so we should help you right now is like saying that New York City should have been concerned about helping Canada the day after 9-11.

Obviously, it could not have been expected to do so. Our deaths are now over twice those of 9-11 and we don’t know who is carrying the virus but not showing symptoms. This is what they are feverishly working on right now.

So I respectfully and lovingly submit to my cousins: give us a break! I’m sure we will be able to help you after we get over our own health crisis, or at least when we are over our supply crisis in the midst of the health emergency (around 1,000 deaths per day right now).

I actually live in one of the currently three worst places in the US. Our Wayne County alone has 223 deaths so far: more than your entire country. Neighboring Oakland and Macomb counties add 201 more deaths. Cobo Hall, the big convention center in Detroit (my high school graduation was in its arena, and we used to go to the big Christmas display there every year, sometimes with the Youngs [our cousins who lived across the river in Windsor, Ontario] ) is now a field hospital.

So in effect you would be arguing: “don’t send those masks to places like Wayne County and New York City, where people are dropping like flies. After all, Canada needs them!”

I confess that this makes no sense to me whatsoever. Perhaps you can explain to me what I am missing in your reasoning.

Tons o’ Love 2 ya, as always,

Cuzzin Dave, the Southerner with half-Canadian blood running through my veins.

***

I have “come to realize” it is a problem? [laughter] I supported Trump’s decision to stop flights from China on January 31st. Eight days earlier, the World Health Organization stated that the virus was not yet a global health emergency. The US had only five cases on January 26th.

Joe Biden condemned Trump as a xenophobic bigot for stopping China flights. But now we know for sure that the influx of Chinese visitors totally caused that tragic outbreak to occur.

Two weeks later on Feb. 15th, China (if we are to believe them, which is another issue) was reporting 143 deaths from the virus: less than we have in my own county right now. The first death in the US occurred on Feb. 29th: almost a month after Trump shut down China travel.

I would say that is very early to take action in perhaps the best possible way he could have: a type of quarantine regarding Chinese visitors to the US. Trump stopped European travel on March 11th (which I also supported). He caught hell for that, too. So he was supposed to let thousands of Europeans (including Italians) into the country, just so he wouldn’t be called a bigot (which liberals will never cease calling him, anyway, because they call every Republican president a bigoted moron)? What kind of madness is that? On March 11th, Mark Landler wrote in The New York Times:

In an Oval Office address on Wednesday night, he imposed a 30-day ban on travel from Europe to the United States, claiming, without evidence, that the European Union’s lax initial response had brought more cases of the virus across the Atlantic, with “a large number of new clusters” seeded by travelers from the Continent. . . .

The same denigration of science and urge to block outsiders has characterized leaders from China to Iran, as well as right-wing populists in Europe, which is sowing cynicism and leaving people uncertain of whom to believe.

You want to blame Trump for this mess (rather than the lying Chinese Communist government, which is where the fault resides). But the worst area by far in the US is New York City. Why? Well, arguably, because Mayor Bill de Blasio (a very liberal guy) was absurdly late in responding to the problem. He declared on Twitter as late as March 2nd: “I’m encouraging New Yorkers to go on with your lives and get out on the town despite Coronavirus.”

On March 3rd, the Archdiocese of Detroit took strong measures to slow the spread of the virus: stopping holy water fonts, discontinuing shaking hands during Mass, and discontinuing the cup during Holy Communion.

On March 6th Mayor de Blasio stated: “the vast majority of places I’m going in the city, I’m seeing people going about their business.”

And on March 8th: “Based on the information we have today we are not, not altering our stance on public events.” Large public gatherings were still permitted.

On March 9th, Italy announced its national quarantine, but de Blasio wouldn’t even close public schools or discourage subway travel.

On March 11th, de Blasio said he was “telling people to not avoid restaurants, not avoid normal things that people do. . . . If you’re not sick, you should be going about your life.” This was just four days before the city finally closed its schools. And he said, “Ebola makes, if I could be so cold, coronavirus look like a walk in the park.” On the same day, the NBA suspended its season. But de Blasio was telling New Yorkers to go to restaurants and maintain a normal life. Hundreds were surely passing along the virus by then.

Our Governor Whitmer (also a Democrat) issued a ban on all gatherings above 250 people on March 13th.

On March 13th, the Archdiocese of Detroit suspended all Masses.

On March 16th The New York Times reported that for the past week, the mayor’s “top aides were furiously trying to change the mayor’s approach to the coronavirus outbreak. There had been arguments and shouting matches between the mayor and some of his advisers; some top health officials had even threatened to resign if he refused to accept the need to close schools and businesses, according to several people familiar with the internal discussions.”

On the same day, Governor Andrew Cuomo limited gatherings to 50 people and closed bars and restaurants:

On the 18th, he ordered businesses to keep 50 percent of their workers at home, then increased that to 75 percent the next day. On the 20th, he ordered all nonessential businesses to close.

By March 23rd, there were already more than 20,000 coronavirus cases in New York state.

Also on March 16th, on the advice of pandemic experts Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, President Trump issued his 15-day guidelines, which followed to a tee the standard model accepted by most scientists: the Imperial College study spearheaded by Neil Ferguson. This called for voluntary isolation as much as possible, avoiding groups larger than ten people, lots of washing of hands, not touching your face, staying home if you are sick, or if anyone in your family tests positive, etc.

Our Governor Whitmer issued a stay-at-home shutdown order on March 23rd, for three weeks. It has since been extended to June 7th.

By March 27th, “New York City’s coronavirus death toll hit 365. The city’s number of confirmed cases is 23,112, jumping 3,101 cases from the day before. Makeshift morgues are set up outside the hospitals in refrigerated trailers. New York City doctors were describing the situation as “hell . . . the system is overwhelmed . . . worse than 9/11.”

The death toll now in New York City is 1,867, with 1,035 more deaths in other parts of New York state (total of 2,902 and continuing to grow). 2,996 died on 9-11. And there are several hundreds more in neighboring New Jersey.

Yet it is still the case on April 4th that Governor Cuomo is not allowing New York residents, suffering from the virus, to obtain the most hopeful treatment of coronavirus, hydroxychloroquine, through pharmacists. The drug was approved for this usage by the FDA on March 30th. Many doctors want to prescribe it to patients, but the governor insists that they have to do it through the already extraordinarily burdened and dangerous hospitals. So more will die, no doubt, because of this madness, too.

See documentation for the New York City timeline and many of the citations above.

***

I think Trump was relatively fast in his responses, according to how the virus was proceeding.

As I noted, he stopped travel from China on Jan. 31st. He stopped most European travel on March 12th (England and Ireland soon after). Prime Minister Trudeau stopped non-US travel to Canada on March 16th, even though his own wife had been infected for a week by then. So who was too slow? What’s the saying about people in glass houses?

How about when the two countries shut down and did the quarantine and social distancing thing? I found an article updated March 11th, from your National Post. It stated:

In the United States, where COVID-19 has sickened more than 800 people and killed at least 30, sports teams are playing without crowds, several concerts have been cancelled and some schools and universities [shortly after, even churches] are shutting down in an effort to keep the virus from spreading.

Canada, meanwhile, has seen very limited domestic transmission of the virus, and event planners say it’s largely business as usual until that changes.

So it is pretty much the same response on the same timeline. When there are few cases and far fewer deaths than cases, both the US (including evil, wicked Trump) and Canada took a cautious “wait and see” attitude. As the cases and deaths grew, then they clamped down and instituted strict measures. This very article links to another in the same magazine form the day before. Note what it stated:

The coronavirus could hit 35 to 70 per cent of the Canadian population, making “a huge number of people ill,” many critically, and makeshift hospitals and quarantine centres could be needed to shore up a health system that has virtually no give, experts predict.

According to a disease-transmission model developed by University of Toronto researchers, the virus’ overall attack rate in Canada, without public health interventions, could exceed 70 per cent. That number drops sharply, by about half, “if we add modest control,” said epidemiologist Dr. David Fisman, one of the model’s creators, but it will take “aggressive social distancing and large scale quarantines” to reduce it further, he said.

So all this was known about the coming situation in Canada by that date, yet the prevailing mentality was still “it’s largely business as usual.” Meanwhile, in the US we were shutting down sports events, churches, schools, and other large social events.

Sorry, I see no big difference there, and it’s quite unfair to blame Trump for things that your country seems to have done in almost exactly the same way (though later than we did, because you had less cases). But your experts were still saying that the virus was on its way and could infect 70% of Canadians.

What a difference two days make! Canada finally started shutting down on March 13th. Why? Because the World Health Organization declared a pandemic on March 11th.

So your shutdown corresponded almost exactly with ours. It was the same day Michigan Governor Whitmer shut down Michigan gatherings above 250, and the archdiocese of Detroit suspended all Masses. President Trump declared a national emergency on this same day (March 13th). At that time there were 1,701 confirmed cases and 40 deaths. Again, I see little difference at all. Countries respond proportionately to how much of a crisis they think they are in.

So it seems to simply boil down to your personal dislike of Trump, which, of course, is not itself an argument. So many arguments come down to personal disdain of him. But it seems to me a crisis like this has to be about much more than our personal dislikes. There were many Brits who didn’t care for Winston Churchill at all, but in the grave situation of 1940, he became everyone’s leader and the political antipathies went by the wayside, while the very existence of western civilization was being maintained. Then after the war he was booted out and the country went for the Labour Party . . .

Meanwhile, even Democrat governors have been praising Trump’s response to the crisis; for example, ultra-liberal California governor Gavin Newsom:

I’d be lying to you to say that he hasn’t been responsive to our needs. He has . . . And so, as a question, as a sort of an offer of objectivity, I have to acknowledge that publicly. The fact is, every time I’ve called the president, he’s quickly gotten on the line.

Even as early as March 9th, he praised Trump:

“We had a private conversation, but he said, ‘We’re gonna do the right thing’ and ‘You have my support, all of our support, logistically and otherwise,'” Newsom told reporters at a Monday news conference.

“He said everything I could have hoped for,” the governor asserted. “And we had a very long conversation and every single thing he said, they followed through on,” he noted.

“Every single thing… has been consistent with expectation we’d repatriate these passengers and do it in a way that does justice to the spirit that defines the best of our country,” the governor said.

Newsom said that he has received “consistent” support from Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, who is leading the administration’s response to the coronavirus outbreak.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo did the same on March 17th:

“His team is on it. They’ve been responsive . . . I want to say thank you.”

The Democratic governor said that he spoke to Trump on Tuesday and that the president is “100 percent sincere” in his desire to work with the state to control the virus outbreak, which has mushroomed in the U.S. over the past week.

The administration is “ready and willing to help,” Cuomo said, “especially on the hospital capacity issue.”

And the next day:

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo praised the president’s handling of the coronavirus outbreak during a press conference Wednesday, saying “we’re fighting the same war… we’re in the same trench.”

“He is fully engaged on trying to help… He’s being very creative & very energetic and I thank him for his partnership.”

Cuomo said Trump was doing a “really good job” and specifically praised him for sending a U.S. Navy hospital ship with 1,000 beds to New York.

Even Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota: an extreme critic of the president and one of the most liberal members of Congress, praised him on March 19th:

Politics aside, this is incredible and the right response in this critical time, . . . we should never let politics get in the way of good policy. This is a great start and hope others will be part of a united front to push for good policies that will help us work through the economic anxiety the country is feeling right now.

Looks like he’s doing a great job to me.

Lastly, even an expert as widely praised (across the political spectrum) as Dr. Anthony Fauci, was talking very differently back between January 21st and February 21st. Very few (if anyone) could see what was coming in March until it was upon us. It makes it all the more remarkable that President Trump closed travel from China on January 31st. And he also saw early on the potential life-saving capabilities of hydroxychloroquine: now increasingly endorsed by many medical experts and doctors. It’s irrational and unjust to the extreme to place all the blame on the President for the virus.

***

My cousin opined: “You yourself as well as your president have been…… up until a few days ago insisted it was under control.”

I did not think this. I don’t know where you are getting this idea. I’ve been making various statements about many aspects of it, but they have to be understood in context.

Our family has totally agreed with and have observed all the recommended guidelines about social distancing and quarantine, and that goes back to mid-March. I have fought conspiratorial hysteria on the far right and anti-Trump hatred and intransigence on the far left. Neither implies that I am contending that no problem exists. I am contending that hysteria and anger do not solve anything.

I have written about the graph curve starting to flatten, not because I am denying that the crisis exists, but because — by nature — I try to look for hopeful signs to encourage my readers. I’ve been tracking the daily deaths since March 22nd. Again, this isn’t denying anything about the crisis. It’s simply looking to see when the light at the end of the tunnel might appear.

So please kindly desist from claiming that I am in some kind of massive denial of the problem. There are Republicans and committed Christians (too many) who do that. I am not one of them. I have condemned them for doing so. For example, opposing the opinions of the far ecclesiological right on March 17th, I wrote:

What I am contending is that if Taylor Marshall wants to argue this way about God’s judgment, and apply it to the current pandemic tragedy (complete with absurd, ludicrous charges that the suspension of Masses — even in pandemic-ravaged Italy? — is also part of God’s judgment), then he has to explain this anomaly of the “good guy” being afflicted and the arch-enemy “bad guy” and antichrist, Pope Francis, walking the streets of Rome virus-free thus far.

I can hardly call the coronavirus a “pandemic tragedy” while at the same time deny that it exists as a major problem and claim it is “under control.” So the fact that you have this notion in your head about me only shows that you have either not read much of my writing about it, or have wildly misunderstood it.

In my first blog article about it on March 13th, I was merely noting that most of the deaths were of elderly persons with existing conditions, and saying that we need not “panic” and that “hysteria” wouldn’t help at all. It doesn’t follow, however, that I was denying the seriousness of the pandemic, for in the same article I wrote:

That’s not to deny the deeply and profoundly serious nature of what we face over the next few months at a minimum. We need to take sensible, rational precautions (most importantly for the elderly and those with any medical condition) — thoroughly wash hands, avoid unnecessary contact and large crowds, stay home if sick, do whatever else is being recommended by the experts in the field.

That’s March 13th. So kindly please stop saying that I have supposedly come to my senses and accepted reality just a few days ago. Thanks!

*
***

Addendum (April 7th): I wrote on April 4th (three days earlier, as I write), to one of my Canadian first cousins (included above):

Once we get a handle on our own severe crisis and have adequate supplies, I’m quite sure we will send you whatever you need. . . . Mark my words: when we are under control, Canada will get all she wants from us, no questions asked.

So, lo and behold, all of two days later, the Trump administration and 3M made a deal, and I was made into a prophet:

The Trump administration has agreed a deal with the US manufacturer 3M to import more than 166m respirators from China over the next three months and allow 3M to continue exporting its US-made respirators. . . .

Meanwhile, the 3M statement said: “The plan will also enable 3M to continue sending US produced respirators to Canada and Latin America, where 3M is the primary source of supply.”

See also a second article verifying this.

Taylor Marshall: Pachamama “Idolatry” Judged by Coronavirus (Yet “Antichrist” Pope Francis Walks the Streets of Pandemic-Ravaged Rome Free of the Virus . . .) [3-17-20]

Alexander Tschugguel, Taylor Marshall, & God’s Wrath [3-19-20]

My Outlook & Goals During This Coronavirus Crisis [3-24-20]

Explanation of Coronavirus Statistics (Dr. JD Donovan) [3-26-20]

“Black Death” Mentality On Display at Patheos Catholic [3-26-20]

Dialogue: [Irrational?] Leftish Reactions to Coronavirus [3-27-20]

Dialogue on Leftish Reactions to Coronavirus, Part II [3-27-20]

Why Has Italy Suffered the Most from Coronavirus? (+ Reflections on the Propriety of Using the Term, “Chinese Flu” / Condemnation of Anti-Chinese Prejudice) [3-28-20]

Coronavirus: Chris Ferrara vs. Science & Historical Precedent (Social Distancing Was Used in the 1918 Flu Pandemic and Has Been Shown Again and Again to be Highly Effective) [4-7-20]

Will US Coronavirus Deaths Be Far Less than Predicted? [4-7-20]

***

Photo credit:enriquelopezgarre(4-2-20) [Pixabay / Pixabay License]

***

Political & Ethical & Moral Issues

leftism & coronavirus

Previous Post

April 3, 2020

Clarifying My Coined Term, "Radical Catholic Reactionary"

Next Post

April 4, 2020 Ronald Knox’s Conversion to Catholicism (In Brief)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz