Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
Hydroxychloroquine: Logic, Evidence, & Irrational Opposition

Hydroxychloroquine: Logic, Evidence, & Irrational Opposition

Last updated on: April 9, 2020 at 6:42 pm by Dave Armstrong

Hydroxychloroquine: Logic, Evidence, & Irrational Opposition 2020-04-09T18:42:40-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One (despite the “politically correct” thought police so prevalent today) is entitled to have an opinion in a scenario where thousands of people are dying, and a good number (many hundreds) take drug X, and in fact, get well (often, dramatically and quickly so). It doesn’t take a science or medical degree (or any degree) to conclude that drug X may indeed be adequate to the purpose: anymore than it takes such knowledge to know and understand that water helps a dehydrated person or that insulin helps a diabetic, or that Tylenol alleviates headaches and toothaches.

There are not adequate studies about hydroxychloroquine and coronavirus as of yet (for lack of enough time having passed since this virus has sprung up), but what we do have is the clinical experience of an increasing number of doctors who have prescribed it and have seen its remarkable success (see the links below).

Hydroxychloroquine is already approved and established as an anti-malaria drug, so it’s not inconceivable that it may be effective for other conditions as well. Further research can substantiate that by the strictest scientific criteria. Right now, we are trying to save lives.

If I am a patient on my deathbed and the doctor says, “there is no hope for you except perhaps this one “semi”-approved drug, that has indeed helped many COVID-19 sufferers become well. Would you like to try it?” Anyone in their right mind would immediately say yes.

As an analogy, ancient peoples discovered that a certain mold helped to cure people. They didn’t know why or how it did so. All that mattered was that it made people well. When modern medicine came along, it discovered that indeed there was a powerful antidote and disease-fighter (i.e., an antibiotic) in particular kinds of mold. We now know it as penicillin (discovered in 1928). Now, was it rational to use the mold to heal folks before 1928? Of course, it was . . .

Another example is white willow bark: in use for centuries as a natural painkiller (I have actually taken a lot of it lately for a shoulder injury). Wikipedia states about it:

Hippocrates, Galen, Pliny the Elder and others believed willow bark could ease aches and pains and reduce fevers. It has long been used in Europe and China for the attempted treatment of these conditions. This remedy is also mentioned in texts from ancient Egypt, Sumer, and Assyria. The first “clinical trial” was reported by Reverend Edward Stone, a vicar from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, England, in 1763 with a successful treatment of malarial fever with the willow bark. . . .

The active extract of the bark, called salicin, after the Latin name Salix, was isolated to its crystalline form in 1828 by Henri Leroux, a French pharmacist, and Raffaele Piria, an Italian chemist, who then succeeded in separating out the acid in its pure state. Salicylic acid, like aspirin, is a chemical derivative of salicin.

So the effective pain-killing ingredient of aspirin was in white willow bark all along. Was it rational, then, to use white willow bark for pain, before aspirin was available (and before modern science and medicine existed)? Again, of course it was. The proof’s in the pudding.

It’s the same with hydroxychloroquine. We can know (in some sense besides the rigidly scientific) that it works from doctors’ case studies and hundreds of anecdotal reports, even before it is scientifically verified under the usual strict, controlled conditions.

The only reason, I submit, anyone thinking rationally about this would conclude otherwise, is because they have been drawn into the political hogwash surrounding anything within a thousand miles of being associated with the dreaded, despised, abhorred Donald Trump.

But if Trump says “2 + 2 = 4,” it still equals four, doesn’t it? Likewise, if he says, “hydroxychloroquine works to heal many people with coronavirus,” it still remains true if real formerly virus-plagued people are out there with their medical case histories, who have in fact recovered due to taking it. And it is true even though evil, wicked Trump (Vlad the Impaler and Attila the Hun rolled into one) agrees with the statement.

A thing is not true simply because someone (however famous or notable) said it was (genetic fallacy), nor is it untrue simply because a widely despised person said it was true (the same logical fallacy in reverse).

I’m only saying what hundreds of doctors are already saying (as the nine articles below document). I would never pretend to be an expert on medical issues such as this without that back-up. I have never told anyone — including coronavirus patients — to go against what their doctors say, and I have supported the shutdown, based on the experts’ opinions. The doctors are massively prescribing this drug now: in New York and my Michigan, where it is presently the worst in the US.

***

Related Reading

“Dr. Anthony Fauci: No clash with Trump on malaria drug for coronavirus” (Tom Howell, Jr., The Washington Times, 3-22-20). Excerpts:

Anthony Fauci, the main scientist in the U.S. coronavirus response, says combining a malaria drug with certain antibiotics shows “anecdotal” promise for COVID-19 patients and that his push for more proof doesn’t mean he is clashing with President Trump.

“I think there’s this issue of trying to separate the two of us. There isn’t fundamentally a difference there,” Dr. Fauci, the director of the told CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “He’s coming at it from a hope-layperson standpoint. I’m coming at it from a scientific standpoint.” . . .

“I’m not disagreeing with the fact, anecdotally, they might work,” Dr. Fauci told CBS. “But my job is to prove definitely from a scientific standpoint that they do work.”

“Governor Andrew Cuomo Coronavirus Briefing Transcript March 23″ (Rev.com, 3-23-20; [link] ). Excerpt:

I also asked for the FDA to expedite the approval of an experimental drug that we are working on here in the state of New York, which I’ll tell you more about in a moment. The President also did that. The FDA gave the New York State Department of Health approval to use on a compassionate care basis a drug that we think has real possibility. On the drug therapy, Tuesday we’re going to start the hydroxy chloroquine with the Zithromax. That’s the drug combination that the President has been talking about. The FDA approved New York State Department of Health to proceed with an experimental drug, again on a compassionate care basis.

“Dr. Stephen Smith on effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine: ‘I think this is the beginning of the end of the pandemic'” (Talia Kaplan, Fox News, 4-2-20). Excerpts:

Dr. Stephen Smith, founder of The Smith Center for Infectious Diseases and Urban Health, said on “The Ingraham Angle” on Wednesday night that he is optimistic about the use of antimalarial medications and antibiotics to treat COVID-19 patients, calling it “a game-changer.”

“I think this is the beginning of the end of the pandemic. I’m very serious,” Smith, an infectious disease specialist, told host Laura Ingraham. . . .

Smith, who is treating 72 COVID-19 patients, said that he has been treating “everybody with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin [an antibiotic]. We’ve been doing so for a while.”

He pointed out that not a single COVID-19 patient of his that has been on the hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin regimen for five days or more has had to be intubated.

“The chance of that occurring by chance, according to my sons Leon and Hunter who did some stats for me, are .000-something,” he said, adding that “it’s ridiculously low.”

Smith explained that “intubation means actually putting a tube down into your trachea and then you’re placed on the ventilator for respiratory support.”

“Hydroxychloroquine rated ‘most effective’ coronavirus treatment, poll of doctors finds” (Natalie, O’Neill, New York Post, 4-2-20). Excerpt:

Of the 2,171 physicians surveyed, 37 percent [i.e., 803 doctors] rated hydroxychloroquine the “most effective therapy” for combating the potentially deadly illness, according to the results released Thursday. . . .

The medicine was most widely used in Spain, where 72 percent of physicians said they had prescribed it.

“After mocking Trump for promoting hydroxychloroquine, journalists acknowledge it might treat coronavirus” (Gregg Re, Fox News, 4-3-20)

“French researcher Dr. Didier Raoult has now treated 1000 coronavirus patient with 99.3% success rate” (Tech Startups, revised 4-6-20). Excerpt:

In a follow-up study, which has a larger sample size of 80 COVID-19 patients, the team found a clinical improvement in all but one 86 year-old patient who died, and one 74-year old patient still in intensive care unit. The team also found that, by administering hydroxychloroquine combined with azithromycin, they were able to observe an improvement in all cases, except in one patient who arrived with an advanced form, who was over the age of 86, and in whom the evolution was irreversible, according to a new paper published today in IHU Méditerranée Infection.

We now have new updates. Tonight, Dr. Oz said during an interview that Dr. Raoult is about to publish the results of his new study. Dr. Oz announced that Dr. Didier Raoult has now treated 1000 coronavirus patient with 99.3% success rate. Of the 1000 patients treatments, 20 patients went to the ICU and 7 patients died. Dr. Raoult said the side effects were trivial things like rash etc.

“Navarro: “Virtually Every” COVID-19 Patient In New York Is Given Hydroxychloroquine” (Tim Hains, Real Clear Politics, 4-6-20). Excerpt:

White House economic adviser Peter Navarro said President Trump was correct to talk about “the possibility” that the long-used anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine can treat some symptoms of the coronavirus. . . .

“You may find this interesting,” he told the CNN host [John Berman]. “In the city that you live in, in New York, in the New York health and hospitals system, virtually every patient now that comes in presenting COVID-19 symptoms is given a cycle of hydroxychloroquine, and when I discussed this last night with Mitch Katz, who is the head of that system, I asked him, are you doing that because the federal government is telling you or because you think it may work? And he said quite clearly that it may work.”

“New updates from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko: Cocktail of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc Sulfate and Azithromycin . . . “ (Tech Startups, revised 4-7-20). Excerpt:

Over the past three weeks, we’ve been sharing with you the great work Dr. Zelenko, a board-certified family practitioner in New York, has been doing in the treatment of COVID-19 patients in New York. In our last piece, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko treated 700 coronavirus patients treated with 99.9% success rate using Hydroxychloroquine, 1 outpatient died after not following protocol. In the meantime, more doctors are seeing success with hydroxychloroquine and Zinc Sulphate in treating coronavirus patients, according to one report from ABC News. 12 French doctors have also filed a petition calling on French Prime Minister and Minister of Health to urgently make hydroxychloroquine available in all French hospital pharmacies

Today, we have new and encouraging updates from Dr. Zelenko. In a one-hour video, Dr. Zelenko provides a detailed medical explanation about why his cocktail of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate, Zinc and Azithromycin (not Z-Pak) works, and why the three-drug combination are really needed in killing coronavirus.

“Reports Are In: Malaria Drug Saves Lives in Coronavirus Crisis, Doctors and Patients Say” (Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, 4-7-20).

Reports are in: Hydroxychloroquine is saving lives and President Donald Trump deserves praise for advocating the malaria drug as a potential cure for COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. A small study in France laid the groundwork for using the drug in treatment. Doctors and patients across America have reported positive results, despite constant naysaying from left-leaning media outlets. . . .

Dr. Anthony Cardillo, the CEO of Mend Urgent Care in Los Angeles, said he is witnessing “significant success” in prescribing hydroxychloroquine to coronavirus patients.

“Every patient I’ve prescribed it to has been very, very ill and within eight to twelve hours, they were basically symptom-free,” Cardillo told ABC News.

***

Photo credit: mohamed_hassan (10-14-19) [Pixabay / Pixabay License]

***

Holistic Health

Political & Ethical & Moral Issues

leftism & coronavirus

Previous Post

April 9, 2020

Dialogue on Method of Communion & Liturgical Development

Next Post

April 10, 2020 Archaeology: Jesus’ Crucifixion, Tomb, & the Via Dolorosa

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz