Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

davearmstrong

David French’s Hit-Piece on Franklin Graham & Trump

Last updated on: April 28, 2019 at 11:56 am   by Dave Armstrong

David French’s Hit-Piece on Franklin Graham & Trump 2019-04-28T11:56:47-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

See: “Franklin Graham and the High Cost of the Lost Evangelical Witness” (4-25-19).

 

I don’t see that French succeeds in making his point of supposed rank hypocrisy on Graham’s part. Graham is not condoning sin. He wrote about the Stormy Daniels thing, as reported by an NBC article:

President Trump I don’t think has admitted to having an affair with this person, and so this is just a news story, and I don’t even know if it’s accurate.

That’s worlds apart from saying, “yes, this report is true, and I don’t care whether he had an affair. It’s not wrong, and it’s irrelevant.” Instead, in the same article, Graham stated:

I believe at 70 years of age the president is a much different person today than he was four years ago, five years ago, 10 years ago. He is not President Perfect.

We certainly don’t hold him up as the pastor of this nation and he is not, but I appreciate the fact that the president does have a concern for Christian values, he does have a concern to protect Christians whether it’s here at home or around the world and I appreciate the fact that he protects religious liberty and freedom.

Trump possibly could have changed. Anything’s possible. This is what the Never Rational Never Trumpers (in their relentless derision and cynicism) won’t allow as a possibility. But Christians are to believe the best of people, not the worst.

 

In another interview from November 2018, Graham reiterated:

I never said he was the best example of the Christian faith. He defends the faith. And I appreciate that very much. Trump has admitted his faults and has apologised to his wife and his daughter for things he has done and said. And he has to stand before God for those things. I believe that he’s a changed person and I’ve never seen anybody get attacked like he gets attacked. These alleged affairs, they’re alleged with Trump, didn’t happen while he was in office.

The comparison (in this charge of hypocrisy and double standards) is to President Bill Clinton, with his proven, admitted affair with an intern while in office, and eleven broken laws and loss of his law license and impeachment, and an incident before Trump took office that has not been proven as fact. Likewise, with Pete Buttigieg, his active homosexuality is readily admitted; he’s proud of it. Last I checked, homosexual sex is a mortal sin. Graham is quite right to note the sinfulness of that, and he has a lot of guts in today’s crazy moral climate to do so. Kudos. Bravo.

 

I don’t see the hypocrisy or inconsistency. He’s not defending sin. He is questioning whether some of the charges against Trump are true. He’s not pretending that Trump is perfect and without fault. No one I know in conservative and Christian circles has ever done that, even though certain loudmouthed folks like Pseudo-Jeremiah II constantly claim (lying) that this is what we do and have been doing.

 

He has been divorced twice and has been in three ostensible marriages. Yep. Reagan was divorced as well and was quite the ladies’ man in Hollywood. I don’t see the Never Trumpers arguing that Christians were rank hypocrites en masse for voting for Reagan because he was divorced: or for McCain in 2008 (also a divorced man). For some reason, the ire there is directed at Trump and his voters only. Double standards and hypocrisy? There are some.

 

We want to make the Playboy interview an issue? That was in 1990 when Trump was an avowed Democrat and extreme pro-abort. Now he is neither. Or was it insincere change again? Reagan changed on both those scores. Reagan had signed a pro-abortion bill in California in 1967 that caused over 200,000 abortions before Roe. Trump never did that.

 

How quickly we forget that President Carter did a Playboy interview in 1976 while he was a candidate. He was the one who claimed to be a born-again Christian. So why isn’t there urinating and moaning about that? Instead we hear about Trump’s interview only.

 

What we do know for sure is that David French is a Never Rational Never Trumper. He wants to casually toss out in his hit-piece that Trump is supposedly lying left and right. What about all the lies about Trump being a treasonous Russian agent: now thoroughly discredited by the Mueller Report? But we see French in a May 2018 interview with F. Chuck Todd, bloviating:

There are an awful lot of people who are desperate, desperate to believe all of this is a bunch of non-sense. Look, I don’t know what’s true and what’s not. All of us have very partial information right now.

Here’s what I do know. Here’s what I do know. If the son of a presidential candidate gets a message from — that is purporting to say, or that actually says, I have information to share with you from the government of Russia about a plan to help Mr. Trump and to help facilitate his election, that it is not right to respond to that with, “I love it.”

 

If somebody does respond with “I love it,” what that indicates is at the very least they were enthusiastic about potentially colluding with the Russians. Enthusiastic about it. In the face of evidence like that among many other things we could go into, to then say all this is is a witch-hunt, all this is is non-sense I think strains credulity.

 

I’ll press the panic button on that after I see what Mueller’s case is. We don’t know what it is. Because I do think that if Mueller has an airtight case in the way some people speculate that he does. Again, I don’t know.

But if he does have an airtight case, that is going to blow up so many narratives and discredit so many people that what you are going to be left with, I would surmise — maybe I’m wildly optimistic, is just tiny, tiny hardcore few, kind of like what Nixon was left with at the end of his time. Again that’s all rampant speculation because we just don’t know.

Well, now we do know . . .

I agree that a President’s moral character is a highly relevant issue. So does Franklin Graham. But we also were forced to make a choice between Trump, with all his faults, including likely much sexual sin, and the radical pro-abort with a long string of dubious legal activities, Hillary Clinton. That choice was very clear for any Christian voter (I submit). Personally, I never ever vote for childkillers, if there is a pro-life choice on the ballot. It’s a dealbreaker, in the way that being a Nazi or KKK member also would be. On the other hand, votes do not suggest or imply absolute approval of everything in a candidate’s policies or life. Anyone who thinks they do is an unthinking idiot.

Lastly, one can take different views as to how much to probe a President’s personal life. In JFK’s and LBJ’s times (no saints: either of them) it simply wasn’t done at all.  Democrats are the ones who blasted into public consciousness the notion (during the Clinton Monica Lewinsky fiasco) that one’s (even a President’s) private sexuality was absolutely irrelevant. And so the public largely now applies that empty-headed libertarian approach to President Trump. If Clinton’s sexual sins were irrelevant, so are Trump’s, whatever they may be (so they reason). I do not think they are irrelevant, in either case. But that is the societal norm the Democrats blessed us with. You make the bed you lie in . . .

***

Photo credit: Advertisement for the American drama film Hypocrisy (1916) with Virginia Pearson, on page 18 of the June 2, 1916 Variety. [public domain / Wikimedia Commons]

***

Political & Ethical & Moral Issues

American politics

Bible & civil government

Catholic social teaching

Catholics & Trump

David French

Donald Trump

honoring rulers

Mark Shea

National Review

Never-Trumpers

politicians & sin

President Trump

Trump Derangement Syndrome

Previous Post



April 28, 2019

Unanswered Questions for a Former Catholic Atheist

Next Post



April 29, 2019 Atheist Falsely Claims I Troll Atheist Site to Get Traffic


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who asked Jesus, "What is truth?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Caiaphas Pilate Nicodemus Herod

Books by This Author Books by Dave Armstrong

See All Titles »

Related posts from Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Free Speech & Inquiry Are Great!: Some of...

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

SCOTUS Decision on Homelessness: Highlights

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Trump, Sham Trials, & Misunderstood Analogies

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

Family

Secularization & Tolerance: Heart 2 Heart w Atheist

Biblical Evidence for Catholicism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube