Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
St. Paul’s Use of the Term “Gift” & Infused Justification

St. Paul’s Use of the Term “Gift” & Infused Justification

Last updated on: November 12, 2017 at 7:24 pm by Dave Armstrong

St. Paul’s Use of the Term “Gift” & Infused Justification 2017-11-12T19:24:19-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

NEWMAN6

(2013)

***

Initially, I got this idea for this chapter from Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman, Lectures on the Doctrine of Justification (1838), chapter 6. Following the lead of his analogy and exegetical argument, I expanded upon it with my usual Scripture study and comparison of words.

The argument, briefly stated, is an analogical one. “Gift” throughout Scripture means something actually imparted internally to us (as in the spiritual gifts). In the overall context of Romans 5, we see a parallel of “made sinners . . . made righteous” (Rom 5:19) — an argument I have used for years — as well as the additional double analogy of “free gift” of both “justification” (5:16) and of “righteousness” (5:17): used synonymously.

The cumulative effect is quite striking, and strongly confirms the Catholic doctrine of actually infused, imparted, intrinsic righteousness / justification and the convergence of justification and sanctification.

The classic Protestant (Calvinist / Lutheran / evangelical) doctrine by contrast, makes justification merely imputed and external and extrinsic, and formally separates sanctification from justification, while stressing that it is still necessary in the Christian life, helpful, and pleasing to God.

Cardinal Newman in the same chapter also makes a brilliant argument, whereby he virtually equates (with much scriptural proof) the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit (and Son and Father) with justification (more on that later). His book is filled with brilliant exegetical insights such as these.

Romans 5:1-21 (entire chapter)

[Bolded] = God’s actions and/or characteristics

[Bracketed] = our actions against God

[Italicized] = our cooperation with God

[Bolded and italicized] = results of God’s actions and our cooperation

Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. [2] Through him we have obtained access to this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in our hope of sharing the glory of God. [3] More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, [4] and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, [5] and hope does not disappoint us, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which has been given to us. [6] While we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. [7] Why, one will hardly die for a righteous man — though perhaps for a good man one will dare even to die. [8] But God shows his love for us in that while [we were yet sinners] Christ died for us. [9] Since, therefore, we are now justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God. [10] For if while [we were enemies] we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life. [11] Not only so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received our reconciliation. [12] Therefore as [sin came into the world through one man and death through sin], and so [death spread to all men because all men sinned] – [13] [sin indeed was in the world before the law was given], but sin is not counted where there is no law. [14] Yet [death reigned from Adam to Moses] even over those whose sins were not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come. [15] But the free gift is not like the [trespass]. For if [many died through one man’s trespass], much more have the grace of God and the free gift in the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. [16] And the free gift is not like the [effect of that one man’s sin]. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brings justification. [17] If, [because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man], much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ. [18] Then as [one man’s trespass led to condemnation for all men], so one man’s act of righteousness leads to acquittal and life for all men. [19] For as [by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners**]**, so by one man’s obedience many will be made righteous. [20] Law came in, to [increase the trespass; but where sin increased], grace abounded all the more, [21] so that, [as sin reigned in death], grace also might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

In the same way that we were “made sinners” (the fall and our unregenerate state, which are literal, actual states of being), by Christ’s death we are “made righteous” (a literal, actual state of being rather than a mere abstraction or declaration): Romans 5:19.

“Free gift” is also juxtaposed against the “trespass” of Adam and Eve and ourselves as part of that rebellion (5:15-17). The “free gift” is thus equated in context with justification and being “made righteous.” The “free gift” is, or causes simultaneously all of the following:

A gift of grace (5:15, 17).

A gift given in grace (5:15).

Justification (5:16).

Righteousness (5:17).

Righteousness, therefore, cannot be separated from justification; it is intrinsic to it, and we arrive at the Catholic doctrine of infused justification (a thing vehemently opposed by Luther and Calvin and Baptists and other evangelicals today). The absolute proof is in the two related analogies: “made sinners . . . made righteous” (5:19) and “free gift of grace / justification / righteousness.”

All of the following things are asserted in this passage (as a result of Christ’s atoning death and our acceptance of it on our behalf):

We’re justified by faith (5:1).

We’re justified by His blood (5:9, 16).

We’re saved (5:9-10).

We’re reconciled to God (5:10-11).

We have peace with God (5:1).

We stand in an abundance of grace (5:2, 15, 17, 20-21).

We have the hope of sharing of the glory of God (5:2).

We have hope in general (5:4-5).

We have God’s love in our hearts (5:5).

We have God in us (the Indwelling) (5:5).

We are righteous — equated with justification (5:17, 19, 21).

We have acquittal from sin and death (5:18).

Eternal life (5:18, 21).

It would seem to follow then, that all of the following are synonymous in essence or at least in large part:

Justification = Salvation by Grace = Reconciliation = Peace With God = God’s Love in Our Hearts = God in Us (Indwelling) = Acquittal = Eternal Life = Righteousness.

Romans 5:21 offers a third related analogy that is akin to the “free grace” analogies of 5:15-17 and “made” analogy of 5:19:

Sin used to reign.

Now grace reigns through righteousness.

In other words, the same grace that saves and justifies is intrinsically connected with righteousness. It reigns or operates through the righteousness. Therefore, it cannot possibly be formally separated from it. The two things are essentially synonymous.

Grace and righteousness had already been closely connected in 5:17 (“the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness”). St. Paul makes another statement of salvation along these lines, connecting Christ’s work, the necessity of our perseverance and chance of falling away, faith, justification, hope, the Holy Spirit, righteousness, and works:

Galatians 5:4-6 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace. [5] For through the Spirit, by faith, we wait for the hope of righteousness. [6] For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of any avail, but faith working through love.

Getting back to Cardinal Newman’s argument that inspired this chapter, I shall now examine the use of “gift” itself. Paul elsewhere uses it as a synonym of justification:

Romans 3:24 they are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus,

Romans 6:22-23 But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the return you get is sanctification and its end, eternal life. [23] For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Protestant theology (for the most part) states that sanctification has nothing to do with salvation. Yet here, eternal life is said to be the “end” of sanctification. That can’t be under Protestant premises. But it makes perfect sense under Catholic premises, whereby sanctification and justification are intertwined or synonymous. Thus, Paul wouldn’t feel any particular need to clarify one against the other. A use of either implies both. That is the case here. Being set free from sin is justification and/or regeneration.

Paul then proceeds to say that we “get” sanctification as a “return.” Therefore, it ineluctably takes place, and in turn leads to eternal life. But in the Protestant view it is optional with regard to salvation. Luther and Calvin urged actual sanctity and adherence to a code of righteousness and morality, but it is formally separated as any means of salvation.

The only problem is that this passage, and many others above and elsewhere do not fit into such a schema. Salvation and justification are free gifts, according to Paul in Romans 6:22-23, and sanctification is in the equation, right along with them. It’s not separated; it is part and parcel.

2 Corinthians 9:14b-15 . . . the surpassing grace of God in you. [15] Thanks be to God for his inexpressible gift!

Justification is, I submit, implied here.

Ephesians 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God

Cardinal Newman argued that the word gift in the New Testament (charisma — Strong’s word #5486) always meant a real, internal thing that affected human lives (thus it is also when used for justification and salvation). He wrote in the section mentioned at the top (section 5):

For instance, in Rom. v. 17 we read, “They that receive the abundance of grace, and of the gift of righteousness, shall reign in life by One, Jesus Christ.” The word gift here used certainly must mean a thing given; implying that the righteousness of justification, whatever it turn out to be, is a real and definite something in a person, implanted in him, like a talent or power, and not merely an act of the Divine Mind externally to him, as the forgiveness of sins may be.

But the preceding verses contain a still more convincing statement, on which indeed one might not be unwilling to rest the whole question. St. Paul says, “Not as the offence, so also is the gift … the gift is of many offences unto justification.” Here, observe, he distinctly declares that justification is the result of a gift. Now the word used for “gift” in the original, is the very word used elsewhere for extraordinary gifts, such as of healing, of tongues, and of miracles; that is, a definite power or virtue committed to us. Nowhere else does the word occur in Scripture without this meaning; indeed, it necessarily has it from its grammatical form. For instance, St. Paul says, he “longs to see” the Romans, “that he may impart unto them some spiritual gift;” again, that “the gift of God is eternal life.” He enumerates as gifts, prophecy, ministry, teaching, exhortation, giving, ruling, and showing mercy. Speaking of continence, he says, “Every man has his proper gift from God.” He says, there are “diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.” He exhorts Timothy “not to neglect the gift that was in him,” but to stir up, to re-kindle, “the gift of God which was in him.” St. Peter too speaks of our “ministering” our “gifts as good stewards.” [Rom. i. 11; vi. 23; xii. 6-18. 1 Cor. vii. 7; xii. 4. 1 Tim. iv. 14. 2 Tim. i. 6. 1 Pet. iv. 10.]

If, then, by a gift is meant a certain faculty or talent, moral, intellectual, or other, justification is some such faculty. It is not a mere change of purpose or disposition in God towards us, or a liberty, privilege, or (as it may be called) citizenship, accorded to us, but a something lodged within us.

This being the case (apart from the analogical exegesis already provided above), if justification is a gift, it is infused, not simply declared in an extrinsic, external, legal fashion.

St. Paul also directly relates the indwelling Holy Spirit to justification and salvation (Newman’s additional argument, alluded to above). Protestants in this instance agree with Catholics that the indwelling is actual and experiential, not merely declared as an abstraction:

1 Corinthians 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.

Titus 3:5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit,

Arguably, he had something similar in mind also, in these additional passages:

Romans 15:13 May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that by the power of the Holy Spirit you may abound in hope.

1 Corinthians 3:16 Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?

1 Corinthians 6:19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, which you have from God? You are not your own;

1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body — Jews or Greeks, slaves or free — and all were made to drink of one Spirit.

2 Corinthians 1:22 he has put his seal upon us and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.

2 Corinthians 3:6 who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not in a written code but in the Spirit; for the written code kills, but the Spirit gives life.

2 Corinthians 5:5 He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who has given us the Spirit as a guarantee.

Galatians 3:14 that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

Galatians 6:8 For he who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption; but he who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.

Ephesians 1:13 In him you also, who have heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and have believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,

Ephesians 4:30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, in whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.

***

Photo credit: Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman [public domain]

***

Salvation & Justification

extrinsic justification

imparted justification

imputed justification

infused justification

Justification

one-time justification

Paul & justification

Paul & the term "gift"

sanctification

soteriology

Previous Post

November 11, 2017

New Testament on the Jewish Background of Christianity

Next Post

November 12, 2017 "In Him": An Expression of the Oneness of Theosis?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz