Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
History and Religion
The Inquisition, Abortion, & ISIS Terrorists (Connections?)

The Inquisition, Abortion, & ISIS Terrorists (Connections?)

Last updated on: May 17, 2017 at 12:54 pm by Dave Armstrong

The Inquisition, Abortion, & ISIS Terrorists (Connections?) 2017-05-17T12:54:49-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Portrait of Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) [Wikimedia Commons / Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license]

Lo and behold, in a combox having to do with the Galileo affair, somehow, the atheists wanted to start harping and carping on about the execution of heretics 500-800 years ago (even though not a finger was laid upon Galileo). Now, if you, dear reader, can explain to me how that is on-topic, and relevant, please let me know. But since it was brought up, I also dared to bring up abortion (the great taboo subject of your time that must never be mentioned in polite company), and also made an analogy of the Inquisition and its rationale, to ISIS, that I just thought of today. Words of my dialogue opponents will be in different colors.

* * * * *

Octavo I have to say that I’m more dismayed by the fact that the church burned people like Giordano Bruno at the stake for heresy than I am that Galileo was confined to house arrest over a scientific dispute, especially since Pope John Paul II apologized about the treatment of Galileo back in 1992.

Korou I kind of agree with you except about the last part – does an apology count after more than three hundred years? At this stage, it’s more a mark against the Church than for it.

It’s more that it’s weird to see Catholics defending the treatment of Galileo when the Pope himself apologized for it.

Where have I defended the treatment of Galileo? The paper is not a defense, but an examination of lesser-known facts amidst all the myths.

It seemed like you were implying that Saint Robert Bellarmine was right to judge the way he did in the Galileo affair. Maybe I misread your tone and intent, as well as that of the quoted passage in the Catholic Encyclopedia.

I’m curious as to what you think about Saint Bellarmine’s judgement in the Bruno case?

I was simply saying that he was right about scientific theory, more so than Galileo was.

We have to understand that for the medievals, heresy was as dangerous as bodily harm, because it harmed people’s souls. Therefore, it was punishable. It was usually assumed that people were in bad faith, rather than ignorant.

I’m not in favor of capital punishment for heresy, nor is the Church now.

And once again, I must ask: are you equally concerned and scandalized by 3,000 babies in their mothers’ wombs being tortured and executed every day in America?

[see facts about what Bruno actually believed]

It isn’t surprising to me that the church put heretics to death for the reasons you mention, but I don’t believe in the moral authority of the church. If executing heretics like Bruno is wrong now, was it always wrong? If not, does past execution of heretics undermine the moral authority of the church?

Abortion is an interesting change of subject, but it’s your blog. I don’t believe in legally enforcing continued pregnancy, but I do support contraception, which does reduce abortions.

Quite true. Same for the Inquisition.

Same for abortion, too: today’s genocide, with many more millions executed for no crime at all, than the Church ever recommended to be killed (for heresy).

Can we perhaps get an admission that the Church “recommending that people be killed for heresy” was a wrong thing to do?

No problem. I’ve never been in favor of it. The Church has not been for hundreds of years. But there is a case that can be made that it was internally coherent in the minds of people who profoundly cared about religious matters. If crime was punishable, so was heresy (they reasoned).

This is what virtually no one understands today, They act as if it was merely power-hungry, bloodthirsty stuff, that had no possible honorable motive.

We find it perfectly acceptable to kill bin Laden because he was responsible for 3,000 deaths due to terrorism.

But we have no opinion whatever about a person or group that leads far more than 3,000 human beings astray with some false religious teaching (say, ISIS).

ISIS is a good example, because it brings corrupt religion and bodily harm together. These people will destroy normal human civilization if left unopposed, and so we are justified in opposing them, and a large, significant part of the reason is their religious fanaticism and evil in the name of religion: which is awful close to the rationale for capital punishment for heresy in the Middle Ages.

Thus, if we ponder for a few moments what we think of ISIS (the group that rapes women, sells them into slavery, beheads children and many others, destroys entire Christian communities, demands forcible conversion to Islam, on pain of death, etc.) and what we should do about them, we will come a long way to understanding what the medievals thought about those who taught rank heresies, over against Catholic teaching.

The Nazis had a wicked, quasi-religious ideology as well, drawing from strange esoteric religious views and the occult, and “Aryan supremacy.” Part and parcel of their wickedness was this quasi-religious view. Left unchecked, it would have destroyed western civilization.

Likewise, the heresies of the Middle Ages were not just some harmless belief-systems that people held behind closed doors, that didn’t and wouldn’t harm a flea. They had dire consequences for civilization (especially the radical notions of Albigensianism or Catharism). The Crusades, of course, had to do with the imperialistic threat of a militant Islam: not unlike the situation of ISIS today.

It was not a simple equation of “you guys disagree with us? We will wipe you out!” If we think about “radical jihadist [corruption of] Islam” today, we have a good idea of what the medievals thought of the Albigensians, Cathari, and other radical religious groups, which were corruptions of Christianity.

If abortion actually involved executing persons rather than removing fetuses then yes, that would be a terrible thing. As it is – millions of women getting surgical procedures performed safely? What good news.

Very well, then: how do you define a person, and why should anyone be bound to your (I will argue, quite arbitrary) definition? When did you yourself first come into existence?

Sophia Sadek The treatment of Bruno convinced Francis Bacon that he needed to keep some of his more radical ideas confined within a circle of trusted friends.

What can preborn babies do today to protect themselves from murder? Not much that I can see.

Some folks sympathize with the fetus that occupies the womb today, while others sympathize with the woman who would prefer to defer maternity to a future date for the sake of the fetus to come. Never the twain shall meet.

We care about both. Your group obviously doesn’t give a damn about the preborn child. You care about only one person involved. We care about mother and child, which is why we created many thousands of crisis pregnancy centers.

Killing one’s own child will never be good for any mother at any time. Therefore, educating and assisting mothers in crisis helps them as well as their child. It’s a win-win scenario, not a win-LOSE scenario, as your pro-abortion views always are.

We must simply agree to disagree.

Wally Noon The Pope employed a full time executioner and torturer at the Vatican until the late 19th century and you worry about apologetics for the treatment of Galileo?

Please document this. Thanks.

[no reply, so a day later, I asked again:]

I asked you to document this yesterday and you still haven’t. Or did it just sound good, so you threw it out, regardless of factual documentation?

Also, since you have such a tender conscience about executions, what do you think of 3,000 babies in their mothers wombs being tortured and executed every day in America? Their heresy was being alive, and having parents who were irresponsible with their sexual organs. Certainly those are crimes punishable by torture and execution, right?

The way you bring abortion up at every opportunity, you certainly seem to think it is a trump card. How about a child who is raped and becomes pregnant – do you think she should be denied an abortion and forced to bear the child of her rapist? Or how about a woman who will die if she does not have an abortion – do you think that she should, then, die?

Yes I do bring it up. Elsewhere I have written [one / two] about the notion that abortion is an annoying “one-issue” or “single issue” thing that we ought to ignore.

Now why don’t you reply to what I actually said about it?

Whether it is a “trump card” is for others to decide. But it is certainly relevant when a few thousand executions under Catholic auspices from 500-900 years ago are brought up and thrown in our face. It’s perfectly sensible to ask, “okay, what do you think about these executions taking place today (3,000 a day) for no reason, against perfectly innocent human beings?” And invariably we get back either silence or these garden-variety hard cases, which in turn, shows the extreme weakness of the ethical “reasoning” involved.

A child should not be murdered because of the sad and tragic circumstances of its birth, anymore than it should be murdered at five years of age because he or she may have one or two beasts for parents. Murder is not the solution to anything. The child is still half the mother’s. It can be brought to term and then offered for adoption. That is a moral and heroic solution to a sad situation; not an indefensible one.

The knowledge that “I killed my own child because his / her father was a wicked rapist” will not help anyone. Knowing that “I allowed my child to live” is something that can easily be lived with. The rape can’t be undone in any event. But we can choose to bring at least some good out of the evil. That applies to many situations in life.

The “have an abortion or die” scenario is extremely rare. It almost never happens. This was confirmed once at a meeting I attended at the University of Michigan, by an abortionist. But it’s wonderful propaganda and “plays” wonderfully to our sick pro-abortion (supposedly “pro-choice”) society, so it’s used. It’s all about what works: not the actual truth of the matter.

The Catholic Church teaches that if a mother’s life is truly in danger, a doctor can and should, of course, do all he can to preserve her life. We only say that he cannot directly kill the child. If the child dies indirectly due to medical procedures, then it is regarded as “saving one life, while not directly causing the end of another,” and is perfectly permissible.

In any event, this is so rare that it shouldn’t be brought up in a discussion of why and for what ethical reason 3,000 perfectly healthy babies with perfectly healthy mothers, are wantonly tortured and murdered every day in America.

For more on the Inquisition and related issues:

“50-68 Million” Killed in the Inquisition?

The Inquisition: Its Purpose and Rationale Within the Medieval Worldview

Inquisition, Crusades, and “Catholic Scandals” (Index Page)

Heresies & Comparative Religion

Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals

Life Issues

Abortion

Bruno

capital punishment for heresy

Previous Post

October 18, 2015

Christianity: Absolutely Crucial to the Origin of Science

Next Post

October 19, 2015 Divorced and Remarried (Etc.) & Holy Communion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz