Luther’s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?

Last updated on: May 21, 2017 at 5:32 pm by Dave Armstrong

Luther’s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability? 2017-05-21T17:32:44-04:00 Dave Armstrong

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bears in Straw of wheat and pea, 2000 carnival procession , Empfingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany; by Werner Baiker [Wikimedia Commons / GNU Free Documentation License and Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Germany license]

The hypocritical Papists, being well aware that their false claim for the supremacy of the Pope cannot stand unless backed by his personal holiness, proceed to bolster up that falsehood by a greater one. They endeavor to give him the reputation of personal goodness by saying he cannot err, for the Holy Spirit never forsakes him, and Christ is ever with and in him. . . . Why do they tell such blasphemous falsehoods? Doubtless because they are aware of the futility of attempting to maintain supremacy without personal goodness; they would be compelled to admit that exaltation without piety must be of the devil.

(Sermon for the Third Sunday in Advent; 1 Corinthians 4:1-5, from 1521)

This is a very common error / misunderstanding; rampant within Protestantism. Here it is right at the source and font of that movement. The true Catholic teaching, of course, is that the pope is infallible under certain conditions, but that this infallibility does not necessarily entail personal holiness. It’s preferable that the pope is a holy man, and most of the popes have been, but this has no direct bearing on his authority in the office of the papacy. Luther himself was always quick to distance his personal imperfections from his (self-proclaimed) authority, and claim that it is irrelevant to the latter; yet he vainly imagines that how Catholics view the relationship of authority and holiness is vastly different.

A Catholic friend replied: “Such statements make Luther seem either dumb or dishonest– perhaps both?” How I see it is that Luther was so prejudiced against the Catholic Church (sometimes with good reason because of the widespread corruption in morals of the time) that he frequently spewed falsehoods about it and painted it in the blackest light. Whether that was deliberate or a result of this prejudice is hard to tell. But the end result is the same in either event: misrepresentation: not of the sins of persons, but of official Catholic teaching.

I have shown that Luther understood the doctrine of papal infallibility in his Leipzig Disputation of 1519.

It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that whatever powers of infallibility or protection the pope was granted (there was some dispute) were distinct from his personal holiness. That argument had been well-established by St. Augustine 1100 years earlier, and Luther was an Augustinian monk. It’s two different things: infallibility and impeccability.

Luther not infrequently made this distinction about himself (usually defending his acid tongue and hyper-rhetoric against complaints from friends and foes alike), but because of his prejudice against Catholicism, he is unable to fathom that the same thing holds there as well: office and personal sanctity are distinguishable from each other, with the former not dependent upon the latter.

What Luther’s error here amounts to is the sort of excessive rigorism and legalism embodied by the Donatists, Montanists, and other such schismatic sects.

It’s ironic, too, that Luther, later in his life, was absolutely disgusted with his own faction of Lutherans, and is on record blasting them over and over in no uncertain terms (I’ve documented it, as usual!). He even admits that their lives are no better than those of the “papists.” So with this pseudo-Donatist view of offices / sinfulness, where does that leave his Lutherans? Obviously no better off than the Catholics. At least he was honest about deficiencies n his own party. Credit where it is due . . . But he couldn’t see that they largely derived from the false principle of sola Scriptura.

St. Paul called himself the “chief” of sinners, yet Protestants are glad to grant him authority and make him their favorite saint and authority figure. King David and committed adultery, yet God (knowing he was to commit those crimes), said he was a man after his own heart, and made an eternal covenant with him. David was even a messianic prototype of our Lord Jesus. Judas was still truly a disciple, and Jesus picked him, didn’t He? Paul called the Galatians and Corinthians brethren, even though they had serious sin; Jesus called the seven churches in revelation “churches”. They didn’t cease being so because of all kinds of serious sin.

These distinctions of authority or legitimate category and personal holiness are pretty basic. Its hard to believe that Luther didn’t grasp them. So I can only conclude that he got carried away by his negative emotions, and logic and knowledge of the Bible and the history of Christian doctrine went out the window, when he talked about the dreaded “antichrist” popes.

Martin Luther

Papacy & Infallibility

Impeccability

infallibility

sinners in the Church

Previous Post

August 17, 2015

Apologia for Vatican II / Misguided Reactionary Criticisms

Next Post

August 18, 2015 "Once Saved, Always Saved" / Eternal Security: Is it Biblical?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category & Last Things About Me Anti-Catholicism Atheism & Agnosticism Baptism and Sacramentalism Bible and Tradition Blessed Virgin Mary Books by Dave Armstrong C. S. Lewis Calvinism & General Protestantism Catholic Apologetics Catholic Apologists Catholic conversion Catholic converts Christmas Church (Ecclesiology) Church History Conversion and Converts Development of Doctrine Eastern Orthodoxy Ecumenism & Christian Unity Eucharist & Liturgy Fathers of the Church French Translations G. K. Chesterton Hell Hell & Satan Hell & Satan & Last Things Heresies & Comparative Religion Holistic Health Inquisition & Crusades & Scandals James White Jews & Judaism & Old Testament John Calvin John Henry Newman Liberal / Modernist Theology Life Issues Literary Resume Lutheranism Mariology Martin Luther Music Orthodoxy Papacy & Infallibility Personal Page Philosophy & Science Political & Ethical & Moral Issues Protestant Persecution & Intolerance Protestantism Purgatory Purgatory & Penance Romantic & Imaginative Theology Saints & Purgatory & Penance Salvation Salvation & Justification Satan & Last Things Sexuality and Gender Issues Spanish Translations Traditionalism vs. Radical Catholic Reactionaries Traducciones al español / tradução para português Trinitarianism & Christology Uncategorized Videos

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 April 2010 March 2010 December 2009 October 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 March 2009 February 2009 October 2008 September 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 October 2005 June 2005 April 2005 February 2005 July 2004 May 2004 April 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz