Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Toward a “Post-Materialist Science”?

Last updated on: September 23, 2026 at 4:36 pm   by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

Toward a “Post-Materialist Science”? 2026-09-23T16:36:36-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Sidney Rigdon at the pulpit

Sidney Rigdon (played by Joe Carlson) makes his case to the assembled Saints at Nauvoo in a scene from the 2024 Interpreter Foundation film Six Days in August.

Have you watched “‘Why Not Sidney Rigdon’ — Episode 35” yet?  Hmmm?  Inquiring minds want to know!  It’s the most recent installment of the Interpreter Foundation’s Becoming Brigham project.

And this article went up today on the website of the Interpreter Foundation:  “Reprint: The Book of Moses as a Pre-Augustinian Text: A New Look at the Pelagian Crisis,” written by Terryl L. Givens:

Part of our book chapter reprint series, this article originally appeared in Tracing Ancient Threads in the Book of Moses — Inspired Origins, Temple Contexts, and Literary Qualities Volumes I and II, edited by Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, David R. Seely, John W. Welch, and Scott Gordon. For more information, go to https://interpreterfoundation.org/books/ancient-threads-in-the-book-of-moses/.

“Coming from a tradition that has labored under the pejorative label of heretics for almost two centuries, Latter-day Saints should be especially attuned to the historical formation of such categories and to revolutions in recent scholarship over the meaning and validity of such labels as they are deployed in Christian historiography. I want to situate the Book of Moses in the midst of such developments, since they give us powerful new grounds for seeing the text as both authentically Christian in its themes and pre-Augustinian in its doctrine.”

On the Dartmouth campus

On the campus of Dartmouth College, in Hanover, New Hampshire (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Much, though not all, is well in Zion:  “Understanding Latter-day Saint Membership Demographics: Shifts in Latter-day Saint numbers in the U.S. align with scriptural prophecies and underscore the importance of spiritual depth over mere numerical strength.”  And see this, too, from the Church itself:  “Measuring What Matters: The People Behind the Numbers”

This is also worth reading (although I should warn you in advance that you shouldn’t be disappointed if the state in question turns out not actually to be Utah): “The Curious Case Of America’s Most Atheist State.”

In the meanwhile, Jonathan Rauch, a gay Jewish atheist, weighs in on the speech given recently in Washington DC by President Dallin H. Oaks: “Perspective: When religion meets constitutional democracy: From the National Cathedral, President Dallin H. Oaks emphasized negotiation and coalition-building over culture war confrontation”

The plaques for Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin in the North Choir aisle of Westminster Abbey (Wikimedia Commons public domain photograph

I’ve finally finished reading Michael A. Flannery, Nature’s Prophet: Alfred Russel Wallace and His Evolution from Natural Selection to Natural Theology (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 2018).

Flannery believes that “One of Wallace’s significant kindred spirits is Anthony O’Hear, professor of philosophy at the University of Buckingham and honorary director of the Royal Institute of Philosophy” (144).  On page 145, he cites O’Hear as observing that

from a Darwinian perspective, truth, goodness, and beauty and our care for them are very hard to explain.  But they exist, at least in the sense that they condition and direct much of our behavior.” (145)

Flannery also notes

the sanguine expectations during the 1990s among geneticists and neuroscientists that between mapping the genetic code and the proliferation of sophisticated technological devices such as the computed axial tomography (CAT) scan and the positron-emission tomography (PET) scan that the problem of intractable disease and even the mystery of the human mind might be definitively solved. . . .

Those high hopes were soon brought down to earth.  Suggestions that chimps share 98 percent of their DNA with humans — even without quibbling over how researchers arrived at that number — only raised greater questions about how such vast differences in cognitive abilities could be explained by a mere 2 percent.  In fact, this 2 percent difference not only gives instructions for a 300 percent bigger brain but a vastly more versatile and competent mind. (146)

Probably paraphrasing “another kindred spirit” of Alfred Russel Wallace — the “physician, commentator, and historian of medicine and science James Le Fanu” (145) — Flannery remarks that

Knowing every cell and synapse will tell us no more, for example, about the brain than studying the paper, ink, and. font composition of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice will tell us about life, morals, marriage, and society among the early nineteenth-century English gentry. (147)

“In the end,” he writes, referring to Sir John Eccles, the  Australian neurophysiologist and philosopher who won the 1963 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on the synapses of the human brain,

C. U. M. “Chris” Smith’s assessment of “Darwin’s Unsolved Problem” is that it remains unsolved.  He even goes so far as to say, “we may be closer to an understanding of how the living world originated on the surface of this planet . . .  but of how it [the human brain[ includes quail, that is phenomenal or sensory consciousness, we are no nearer understanding than Darwin was a century and a half ago.”  The point is Wallace’s enigma remains, and attempts to answer it by Darwinian mechanisms seem little more than another reversion to the “promissory materialism” Eccles complained of more than a quarter century ago. (149, italics in the original)

One final quotation for now, referring to a manifesto calling for a Post-Materialist Science (PMS):

A summary of its principal tenets relevant to Wallace include a rejection of materialism and a complete rejection of its attendant reductionism, a rejection of the idea that the mind is nothing but a physical activity of our brains, mind is as important as the physical world and is, in fact, a primordial aspect of it, it openly encourages systematic investigation of psi phenomena (extrasensory perception, precognition, and psychokinesis), it also encourages controlled laboratory experiments with mediums and is interested in studying near-death experiences.  PMS believes that “Mind is fundamental in the universe, i.e., it cannot be derived from matter and reduced to anything more basic.”  Indeed, “scientists should not be afraid to investigate spirituality and spiritual experiences since they represent a central aspect of human existence.” (152)

To read the Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science and to examine its list of signatories (totaling, at the moment approximately 610 scientists, professors, physicians, and “thought leaders”), see here.

 

 

History and Religion

Travel and Religion

Uncategorized

Alfred Russel Wallace

brain

materialism

mind

naturalism

science

Previous Post



September 22, 2026

"The Appeal of Socialism and the Case Against It"

Next Post



September 24, 2026 An action movie and some vacuous theology

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"TThe last part of your comment is very telling."

Phil Leaning


Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"Thank you, abc, for the heads up. I thought the link was pretty long, but ..."

John Perry


Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"lol everytime"

TheLastDanite


Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"Amazing, indeed.Forgive me now for a tangent, but the link you posted contains a series ..."

axelbeingcivil


Beethoven and the Berlin Wall


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What root attitude does Paul say is the "root of all kinds of evil"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Love of animals Love of music Love of wisdom Love of money

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

I'm offended by it

Sic et Non

Family

A case of twin near-death experiences?

Sic et Non

Family

This Wednesday, at 4 PM, Utah time

Sic et Non

Family

What if Wallace had prevailed, rather than Darwin?

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Donald Trump's Heaven? No Room For God

Donald Trump’s heaven would be filled with grudges, backbiting, refusal both to...

Peruvian airplane ready for Pope Leo XIV

The Chilean airline LATAM which serves as the main domestic flight provider...

Bear One Another’s Burdens, But Carry Your Own...

At first glance, Paul seems to contradict himself within the span of...

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical Century?

Will the form of Christianity that prevails in the years ahead be...

Crying in the Kitchen: When My Body Finally...

It was still dark when I found myself dancing in the kitchen...

'I Play Rocky': A Two-Fisted Tale of Hope...

Amazon MGM's 'I Play Rocky' recreates the making of the 1976 blockbuster...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube