Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
History and Religion
A means to an end

A means to an end

Last updated on: March 3, 2026 at 3:01 pm by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

A means to an end 2026-03-03T15:01:22-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Brigham Young (John Donovan Wilson), Mary Ann Angell Young (Twyla Wilson), and a younger, up and coming actor in a scene from Six Days in August (2024)

With sixteen other friends (neighbors and former neighbors), as is our fairly regular practice, my wife and I went out to dinner last night at the Joy Luck Restaurant in Sandy and then, afterwards, to the nearby Hale Centre Theatre, where we attended a performance of the farce Peter Pan Goes Wrong. It’s not exactly Sartre, Brecht, or Anouilh, but it’s much funnier than anything any of them ever wrote Two personal highlights for me:

In Monday night’s performance, the part of Wendy Darling was well played by Twyla Wilson, who portrayed Mary Ann Angell, Brigham Young’s second wife, in the Interpreter Foundation’s 2024 dramatic film Six Days in August. (Twyla also happens to be the actual wife of our Brigham Young, John Donovan Wilson, which we didn’t recognize until after she had been cast.)
At one point in the play, an actor comically appeals to a member of the audience for help (and receives it). I was fairly far away and the theater was darkened, but I thought that I recognized the audience member who was selected last night. And, sure enough, as we were exiting the theater I ran into Blake Ostler and his wife.

Incidentally, for those who pretend to worry about such things: No Interpreter Foundation funds were used to purchase our play tickets or our egg rolls or our transportation to and from the theater.

Also of note: Becoming Brigham, Episode 6—”Young Brigham Young,” Part One is now up online for free viewing — as all of the installments are that have been posted thus far, at becomingbrigham.com. Please watch, enjoy, subscribe, and share.

In the meanwhile, the Interpreter Foundation continues to be completely dormant, as prophesied. More than thirteen years ago now, on a far-away message board, a pseudonymous critic going by the moniker Bond James Bond took it upon himself to issue a prediction. And here are the words that he uttered:

By Jan. 1, 2014 Interpreter will be dead. . . . Either totally dead or down to token “blog” style postings. (Bond James Bond, 25 January 2013)

The latest evidence of Interpreter’s long-obvious coma is today’s new installment of the concise notes for scripture study that are so kindly and generously provided each week by Jonn Claybaugh: Come, Follow Me — Old Testament Study and Teaching Helps (2026): March 9-15: Genesis 37-41 — “The Lord Was With Joseph.”

A view of the main surviving portion of the large Furness Abbey complex in England
(Wikimedia Commons public domain photo) In post-Christian America, I think, most ruined churches won’t be quite so picturesque.

This is interesting, from the Gallup organization: “Americans’ Religious Engagement Holds at Lower Levels: 47% consider religion very important, religious “Nones” tick up to 24% and religious service attendance remains low”

Back on 21 February (see here), I admiringly cited a passage written by Justice Neil Gorsuch of the Supreme Court of the United States in a decision regarding President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs. I called it “an extraordinary piece of writing — clear, concise, charitable, lucid, well-targeted, and wise.” So I was pleased to see this Deseret News column about it, written for the Deseret News by Thomas B. Griffith and Joshua Topham: “Opinion: Justice Gorsuch’s powerful lesson for the United States: Tucked in the 170 pages of the justices’ opinions and dissents, Justice Neil Gorsuch teaches about the most important feature of the government”

Several rows of Oscars. Sigh. I’ll probably never win one. Based on its history, though, I still have a reasonably good shot at taking home a Nobel Peace Prize.

For many years now, I’ve been puzzled by the complaint that somebody — let’s call him Francis — believes that “the end justifies the means.”

What on earth would justify “the means” if it weren’t for “the end” to which those “means” were . . . well, means?

Why dig a big hole in the ground? Just for the sake of digging a big hole? Wouldn’t the justification of digging the hole lie in the end, the purpose, for which it was being dug? Say, in quest of essential minerals, or to construct the foundation of a hospital?
Why spend scores of hours learning to decline Ancient Greek nouns or to conjugate Ancient Greek verbs? For the fun of it? (Then that fun would be the end that justifies those hours.) Enabling oneself to read Homer or Plato or the four New Testament gospels would justify the effort of learning to conjugate παιδεύω or to decline λόγος, but it’s difficult to see much point in doing so simply for the sake of doing so.
Exercise makes sense as a means of losing weight or improving or preserving one’s health or, even, for those curious souls who feel this way, as a pleasurable activity. But genuinely pointless exercise, if such a thing can be imagined, seems completely pointless.
Doing endless chemical experiments while having no interest in their results would be likewise pointless. However, doing so in order to solve a scientific problem or to further human knowledge or even in hopes of winning a Nobel Prize makes sense.

What makes a “means” a means is, precisely, that it is an action or a system by which a result is brought about. We seek a resolution by “peaceful means” because we want to solve a problem without war or violence. We seek to improve our financial condition by means of budgetary restraint or increasing our income.

It seems to me that what people are really saying, when they complain that Francis believes that “the end justifies the means,” is that he thinks that some end that he has chosen justifies any and all means, including those that are immoral, unethical, harmful, or disproportionate. Directing a nuclear missile strike against your own position in order to put an end to that pesky fly may well be effective, but it seems rather out of proportion. So, too, does avoiding too much salt consumption by foregoing all food. Fatally wounding a convenience store clerk in order to steal ten dollars from the cash register is morally unjustifiable. When criticizing the idea that “the end justifies the means,” people are actually saying that some means cannot be justified or, at least, that the price for some things is just too high.

Because the fact is that the end often does justify the means. It’s just about the only thing that can.

History and Religion

Travel and Religion

Previous Post

March 2, 2026

Difficult to explain away

Next Post

March 4, 2026 A plea for rhetorical self-restraint, against triumphalism

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"DP: “But Mr. Sutherland worries about the fact that our time, when we can communicate ..."

Theodore Brandley

Learning more about a region of ..."

"Another class of memories are of individuals who previously lived. Some of these remembered individuals ..."

PlasmaMiasma

Accounts of Premortality?

"Sutherland's lecture sounds interesting. He seems to restate the Washington consensus that trade brings peace ..."

B. Wilson

Learning more about a region of ..."

"In a meeting today, I learned another important reason why accurate (or at least as ..."

the PROBLEM

From Serbia’s “White City,” Belgrade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What queen visited Solomon to test his wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Queen of Egypt Queen of Tyre Queen Esther Queen of Sheba