Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

“Once more unto the breach, dear friends”

Last updated on: August 15, 2025 at 5:21 pm   by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

“Once more unto the breach, dear friends” 2025-08-15T17:21:32-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Ammon, Lamoni, and Lamoni's Dad

An uncomfortably modern-American-looking Ammon looms over the father of King Lamoni in a Church illustration for children.  (LDS.org)

As today is Friday, a new article was published today in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship.  It is “Nameless to New Name: Namelessness in the Narrative of the Anti-Nephi-Lehies, or the People of Ammon,” and it was written by Nathan J. Arp

Abstract: A narrator may choose to provide or withhold the name of a character for many reasons. This article hypothesizes that Mormon intentionally omitted the name of two key characters, a Lamanite king and queen. Both feature in his narration of the mission to the Lamanites and the miraculous conversion it inspires, as recounted in the book of Alma. While it is not possible to know exactly what information Mormon and other record keepers of the Book of Mormon had or preserved, it is at least plausible that Mormon might have intentionally omitted the name of these two Lamanites. Namelessness invites the reader to encounter and re-encounter the gospel in a story simultaneously historic and symbolic, at once particular and universal. The intentional absence of these names emphasizes, instead, the new name the converted Lamanites would take upon themselves and points the reader to the name of Jesus Christ.

“Interpreting Interpreter: Two Unknown Names,” written by Kyler Rasmussen

This post is a summary of the article “Nameless to New Name: Namelessness in the Narrative of the Anti-Nephi-Lehies, or the People of Ammon” by Nathan J. Arp in Volume 66 of Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship. All of the Interpreting Interpreter articles may be seen at https://interpreterfoundation.org/category/summaries/. An introduction to the Interpreting Interpreterseries is available at https:/interpreterfoundation.org/interpreting-interpreter-on-abstracting-thought/.

A video introduction to this Interpreter article is now available on all of our social media channels, including on YouTube at https://youtube.com/shorts/BvKM62FKygo.

The Takeaway: Arp argues that Mormon may have intentionally omitted the names of two important Book of Mormon figures in the narrative of the Anti-Nephi-Lehies—the father and wife of King Lamoni—changing the way readers encounter those characters and emphasizing the new identity that they would adopt as disciples of Christ.

And (sadly, my delay in calling attention to this article will, no doubt, confuse and, thus, anger some), this reprint appeared yesterday, after I had posted my blog entry for the day: “Seek Ye Words of Wisdom: “Hebrew Words Reflected in the Book of Mormon,”” written by my late friend John A. Tvedtnes.

Part of our book chapter reprint series, this article originally appeared in Seek Ye Words of Wisdom: Studies of the Book of Mormon, Bible, and Temple in Honor of Stephen D. Ricks, edited by Donald W. Parry, Gaye Strathearn, and Shon D. Hopkin. For more information, go to https://interpreterfoundation.org/books/seek-ye-words-of-wisdom/.

“From the words of Moroni in Mormon 9:33, it is clear that the Nephites were still acquainted with some form of the Hebrew language a thousand years after Lehi’s family left Jerusalem. And though at least Mormon and Moroni employed a script they called “reformed Egyptian” in place of the Hebrew alphabet, it is likely that they employed this script to transcribe Hebrew words rather than Egyptian words. Consequently, several scholars have discussed evidence that the Book of Mormon reveals a Hebrew background.”

Does this capture the truth?

The Church, as envisioned in some imaginations, selfishly slumbering upon the funds that have been greedily accumulated by Ensign Peak Advisors (Wikimedia Commons free download)

There continues to be much controversy — or, in certain circles, no remaining controversy but, rather, a settled and cynical consensus — about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its finances.  This article, from the B. H. Roberts Foundation, is very clear and, I think, quite useful.  It has the considerable advantage, too, of being neither unfair nor hysterical: “The $100 Billion Fund”

Regarding another very controversial matter:  I raised the issue yesterday — because it had been raised by a joint presentation at the recent 2025 FAIR Conference by an attorney and a licensed professional therapist — of mandated reporting by clergy in cases of child sexual abuse.  (See “On Child Sexual Abuse and the Church’s ‘Help Line.'”)   Quite predictably, I’ve been severely criticized in certain quarters for the position that I implicitly took.  And, I think, with deliberate dishonesty, for positions that I emphatically have not taken (e.g., that sex abusers “deserve” protection by clergy), or that directly contradict the point that I made (which is certainly not that lower rates of reporting are good because they demonstrate lower rates of actual abuse).  So, being the proverbial fool who rushes in where angels fear to tread, I offer a few more links to relevant discussions:

“Utah’s Legislative Leap: From Reporting to Supporting Child Welfare: New Utah legislation follows best practices for child safety, merging legal protection with moral duty.” (Public Square Magazine, 2024)

“Mandatory Reporting Isn’t the Solution: It’s increasingly common to hear people point towards laws compelling reporting as the answer to our child abuse crisis. Yet the research doesn’t back this up – highlighting a number of complications that need more attention.” (Public Square Magazine, 2022)  For background on the author of this article, see here.

“Are Publicized Abuse Cases Exceptional or Representative of Our Faith? Responses to key questions regarding the Associated Press report alleging attempts to cover up sexual abuse cases in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” (Public Square Magazine, 2022)

“Should a member of the clergy report sex abuse of the penitent? A look inside the priest-penitent privilege” (Deseret News, 2022)

Edited to add:  I hope that he doesn’t mind, but I’ve taken the liberty of copying the bulk of a comment from one of the readers here (who is retired from a career in public health and who goes by the moniker t. tangata neneva) and pasting it here below:

Maybe this 2016 article by Palusci et al will help: ” Does changing mandated reporting laws improve child maltreatment reporting in large U.S. counties? ” (link), Children and Youth Services Review 66:170-179.

What caught my attention: “… Universal reporting was associated with higher report rates for physical and sexual abuse, and clergy reporting requirements were associated with more sexual abuse, medical neglect and psychological maltreatment confirmed reports. However, while counties in states that changed their clergy reporting laws had higher increases in total reports, they had fewer confirmed physical and sexual abuse, neglect, and psychological maltreatment reports. More pronounced changes were noted in a state that made more pronounced changes in its clergy reporting laws. Policymakers should consider whether changing requirements for mandated reporting meaningfully improves child maltreatment identification.”

Or this 2024 NPR Report: ” States find a downside to mandatory reporting laws meant to protect children ” (link).

What caught my attention: “More than 60 years ago, policymakers in Colorado embraced the idea … [and passed] the first mandatory reporting laws in the nation. … [Since then] mandatory reporting laws have expanded nationally … But now there are efforts in Colorado and other states … to roll back these laws, saying the result has been too many unfounded reports, and that they disproportionately harm families … studies do not demonstrate that mandatory reporting laws keep children safe, the Colorado task force reported in January, there is evidence of harm. …”

It would seem, in other words, that the issues here don’t easily resolve themselves into simple bumper-sticker slogans or simplistic morality plays in which those who call for universally-mandated reporting of child abuse wear white hats and those who have reservations about universally-mandated reporting — and, of course, leaders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — wear black hats and stand for unambiguous evil.

A calligraphic rendition of the name of the Prophet

“Muhammad, upon whom be peace” in Arabic calligraphy
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Here’s a new book that, I expect, will be hailed in certain circles despite the fact that, from what I can see at a distance, it deserves little or no actual attention:  “Stephen Kent Unmasks Himself: From Anti-Cult Scholar to Anti-Religion Crusader: “Psychobiographies and Godly Vision” argues that Paul the Apostle, Muhammad, and most founders of religions were no less mentally disturbed than “cult” leaders.”  For what it’s worth, I once helped to host Massimo Introvigne when he visited Brigham Young University many years ago.  More importantly, while the notion that Muhammad and his visions could be explained by epilepsy was popular in certain circles about a century and a half ago, I can think of no serious scholar or biographer who gives the idea any credence today.  (Similar reductive treatment was also briefly given to Joseph Smith but, again, there is — so far as I’m aware — no reputable authority on Joseph’s life, whether believer or unbeliever, who sees any merit in the claim that he was an epileptic.)

 

 

Travel and Religion

History and Religion

Uncategorized

abuse

clergy

Ensign Peak Advisors

finances

Latter-day Saint

Mormon

Previous Post



August 14, 2025

On Child Sexual Abuse and the Church's "Help Line"

Next Post



August 16, 2025 Yet Again, Just One More Time, on That "Help Line"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I told my daughter-in-law to uncover a man's feet and lie down at the threshing floor. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rebekah Naomi Ruth Bathsheba

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Accounts of Premortality?

Sic et Non

Family

Notes on Women, Priesthood, and General Conference

Sic et Non

Family

"The Book of Moses as a Temple Text"

Sic et Non

Family

Winding up

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026

He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube