Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
History and Religion
From the desk of an intellectually bankrupt Mopologist

From the desk of an intellectually bankrupt Mopologist

Last updated on: August 25, 2025 at 2:58 pm by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

From the desk of an intellectually bankrupt Mopologist 2025-08-25T14:58:36-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A photograph taken of revelers at the 2025 Interpreter Foundation birthday party? (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Up today on the immutable and unchanging website of the Interpreter Foundation: “The Interpreter Foundation Podcast — August 14, 2025: Plausibility Structures, Intellectuals, and the Church’s Truth Claims; The Interpreter Foundation Birthday Party

During the 14 August 2025 episode of the Interpreter Foundation Podcast, our hosts Terry Hutchinson, Kevin Christensen, and Mark Johnson discussed an article on plausibility on the Times and Seasons blog (https://timesandseasons.org/ and the 13th annual Interpreter Foundation Birthday Party. The audio track is also included in our podcast feed (https://interpreterfoundation.org/feeds/podcast).

Book of Mormon lands? An image from Utto at the English-language Wikipedia, posted here as an act of defiance to those who would like to define me as a quasi-apostate because I don’t share their opinions on the geography of the Book of Mormon.

I came across the claim today — far and away not for the first time, but I was reminded of it yet again this morning — that “intellectually bankrupt Mopologists” such as I, with our notions of a relatively small (i.e., non-hemispheric and not even continental) geography for the Book of Mormon and of a relatively small population of Jaredites, Nephites, and Lamanites surrounded by other peoples, have redefined the Book of Mormon. We’ve made it a lineage history, although supposedly not a single apostle or prophet has ever defined it that way — nor, for that matter, has the Book of Mormon itself. Thus, we’ve clumsily destroyed the Book of Mormon in our hopeless and desperate attempt to save it.

However, as William James used to say, the only thing needed to disprove the claim that all crows are black is one white crow. Accordingly, I give you President Anthony W. Ivins, First Counselor in the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, speaking in the Church’s April 1929 General Conference:

So I say one by one criticisms which have been made regarding the Book of Mormon are falling by the way through the investigation of scientists who understand their business. I thank the Lord for them and that which they are undertaking to do. I have never had any fear that a thing would be discovered to disprove the truths contained in this book.

We must be careful in the conclusions that we reach. The Book of Mormon teaches the history of three distinct peoples, or two peoples and three different colonies of people, who came from the old world to this continent. It does not tell us that there was no one here before them. It does not tell us that people did not come after. And so if discoveries are made which suggest differences in race origins, it can very easily be accounted for, and reasonably, for we do believe that other people came to this continent.

There is a great deal of talk about the geography of the Book of Mormon. Where was the land of Zarahemla? Where was the City of Zarahemla? and other geographic matters. It does not make any difference to us. There has never been anything yet set forth that definitely settles that question. So the Church says we are just waiting until we discover the truth. All kinds of theories have been advanced. I have talked with at least half a dozen men that have found the very place where the City of Zarahemla stood, and notwithstanding the fact that they profess to be Book of Mormon students, they vary a thousand miles apart in the places they have located. We do not offer any definite solution. As you study the Book of Mormon keep these things in mind and do not make definite statements concerning things that have not been proven in advance to be true. (Anthony W. Ivins, Conference Report [April 1929], 16.)

So much for the claim that not a single apostle or prophet has ever viewed the Book of Mormon in such a way. One white crow.

And what about the allegation that the Book of Mormon doesn’t support the idea of a limited geography that is contained within, but is not identical to, the Americas? For that, I refer you to the opening pages of John L. Sorenson’s 1986 classic An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon, where Professor Sorenson systematically examines the geographical indicia — e.g. the distances and directions — given within the text. He demonstrates that a limited geographical model is not only permitted by the Book of Mormon but, in fact, demanded by it.

Professor Sorenson published An Ancient American Setting nearly four decades ago. President Ivins delivered his Conference address more than ninety-six years ago. I think that enough time has elapsed that critics of the Church should up their game. They should no longer get away with alleging that not a single apostle or prophet has ever claimed that there might have been peoples in the New World other than those who figure prominently in the Book of Mormon. Enough time has passed that detractors who flatly declare that the Book of Mormon text does not admit of a limited-geographical reading should be called on it.

Kilmar was here! (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

First El Salvador and now Uganda: Be Kilmar Abrego Garcia and see the world! At government expense!

In a decently-run society, such crimes against humanity as that described below would be — at a maximum — restricted by law to locations like LaVell Edwards Stadium at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. They should certainly not be permitted to go on the road. (Wikimedia Commons public domain photograph)

As revealed by this item from the Christopher Hitchens Memorial “How Religion Poisons Everything” File™, religionists aren’t content to make their own native habitats hellish. Instead, they also seek to destroy places where other people live, innocent people who’ve done nothing to deserve these fanatics’ unwelcome attention: “Cougs Care service tailgates set for 2025 BYU football season: Fans planning to attend a road football game this year are invited to participate in the BYU Alumni tailgate and team up on a service project that supports families and communities in each road-game city.”

History and Religion

Travel and Religion

Previous Post

August 24, 2025

De mortuis nil nisi bonum

Next Post

August 26, 2025 Good and Faithful Servants

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The BYU School of medicine alreasy has some female faculty members. Having done a complete ..."

John Pack Lambert

The Iron Gates and the Lion ..."

"“Enough and to Spare”I love their closing statement:“Joseph’s revelations related to the issues of scarcity ..."

Theodore Brandley

Walking through History

"Thanks John. You always have so many interesting facts. I could listen to you read ..."

I Dig My Job!

Walking through History

"You dig out some really interesting information from the background details of the Church."

Phil Leaning

Walking through History

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What king of Israel was famous for his chariot and for fighting Ahab?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Omri Jeroboam Joash Jehu