Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
History and Religion
Thinking about Evolution

Thinking about Evolution

Last updated on: May 20, 2024 at 12:33 pm by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

Thinking about Evolution 2024-05-20T12:33:08-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

After a long period of development, the modern naturalistic ideologue emerged.
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

I have a new article up in Meridian Magazine and I hope that you’ll take a look at it. In it, I recommend a book that I recently read and that I very much enjoyed: “How Can We Make Sense of Evolution?: A Latter-day Saint Perspective”

Now let me continue on that subject for just a little bit. Although a few critics on the Peterson Obsession Board maintain that I’m a young-earth creationist who completely rejects evolutionary biology, I’m not. As I’ve said on the multiple occasions that people have asked me how old I believe the Earth and the Universe to be, I answer that they are, respectively, 4.543 billion and 13.7 billion years old. At least, subject to revision those are my current estimates. However, I think that I tend to be quite a bit more sympathetic to the questions raised by some in the “Intelligent Design” movement than is the author of the book in question. That will possibly be evident from the next portion of this blog.

A tidal pool. Did Earth’s organic life originate in such a place? There seem to be humanoid creatures in the water. (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Below, I share with you a lengthy quotation from Matti Leisola and Jonathan Witt, Heretic: One Scientist’s Journey from Darwin to Design (Seattle: Discovery Institute Press, 2018). Matti Leisola, DSc, is a bioengineer and former dean of Chemistry and Material Sciences at Helsinki University of Technology. He is an expert in enzymes and rare sugars, having published 140 peer-reviewed articles and won the Latsis Prize from the ETH-Zürich (the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology). He served for a time as the research director of Cultor, an international biotech company, co-founded the International Society of Rare Sugars, and was the founding editor of BIO-Complexity.:

In the same era, the Englishman Thomas Huxley gave a talk at the Royal Geographical Society. There he told about a jelly-like matter found on the bottom of the sea. He named it Bathybius haeckeli, in honor of [Ernst] Haeckel, his fellow Darwin disciple, and suggested that a slimy layer of the stuff covered perhaps hundreds of square miles on the sea bottom. He proclaimed it the missing link between inorganic matter and organic life. In reality it was only a precipitate that was formed when alcohol was added to seawater.

Darwin contributed to this tradition of imaginative origin-of-life storytelling in an 1871 letter to Joseph Hooker:

It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present. — But if (& oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia & phosphoric salts, — light, heat, electricity &c present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured , or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.

Met by such imaginative yarn-spinning it is surely reasonable to ask what does experimental science actually tell us about the origin of life, fanciful storytelling aside? Part of the answer is that, for a time, experimental science seemed to offer tentative support for the idea that life could emerge spontaneously from very humble source material. The ancient Chinese found evidence that aphids could spontaneously generate from bamboo. Documents from ancient India reference the spontaneous generation of flies from dirt. And the Babylonians concluded that canal mud could generate worms. No less a thinker than Aristotle concurred, seeing no reason to doubt these ancient testimonials.

Later, in the Renaissance, the Flemish chemist and physician Jan van Helmont wrote instructions about how to get mice to emerge from pots containing moist seeds and dirty rags.

But how all this could be remained a mystery. The discovery of microorganisms began to cast doubt on the idea that life regularly and easily sprang from non-life. And eventually the French Academy promised a reward to the one who could solve the puzzle. Louis Pasteur got the prize after showing with an ingenious experiment that living organisms — and specifically in his case, microorganisms — do not form spontaneously. Experiments in the decades that followed confirmed his findings. It was soon conventional wisdom: In the normal course of things, only life begets life.

The hope of finding experimental evidence for the spontaneous formation of life has, however, not been abandoned. It was now clear that life from non-life is not part of the usual course of things, but perhaps it did belong to the realm of the unusual and long ago, and perhaps this possibility could be demonstrated in the lab. The biochemist Alexander Oparin’s 1924 Russian-language work The Origin of Life offered a partially testable hypothesis for how this might have happened. And John Haldane, apparently unaware of Oparin’s Russian-language work, offered a similar proposal in English in 1929. A generation later, in 1953, Stanley Miller put their ideas to the test.

A picture of Miller’s equipment has been featured in practically every biology textbook since then. The public has been led to believe that thanks to Miller’s experiment, the problem of the origin of life has largely been solved, at least in broad outline. The 1960 declaration of famous paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson in the journal Science is representative: “The consensus is that life did arise naturally from the nonliving and that even the first living things were not specially created,” he wrote. “The conclusion has, indeed, really become inescapable, for the first steps in that process have already been repeated in several laboratories. (21-23)

I really like the new Utah state flag.

Here’s an interesting story: “76% of Utahns identify a religious affiliation, the largest of any state: Several denominations have grown in Beehive State in past decade”

Such statistics may bear some slight relationship, at least, to Utah’s appallingly poor performance in recent metrics. I’ve already mentioned this one, for example, but you may have missed it. In any case, you can take it as representative of my adopted state’s miserable record: “Utah ranked the No. 1 overall state by U.S. News and World Report: Utah takes the crown for the third year in a row”

History and Religion

Travel and Religion

Previous Post

May 19, 2024

“I did liken all scriptures unto us"

Next Post

May 21, 2024 "Among the most significant holy sites in the world"

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"DP: “But Mr. Sutherland worries about the fact that our time, when we can communicate ..."

Theodore Brandley

Learning more about a region of ..."

"Another class of memories are of individuals who previously lived. Some of these remembered individuals ..."

PlasmaMiasma

Accounts of Premortality?

"Sutherland's lecture sounds interesting. He seems to restate the Washington consensus that trade brings peace ..."

B. Wilson

Learning more about a region of ..."

"In a meeting today, I learned another important reason why accurate (or at least as ..."

the PROBLEM

From Serbia’s “White City,” Belgrade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The apostles drew lots to choose Matthias to replace Judas.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE