Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Education and Religion
A Note on Reason and our Faith in Science

A Note on Reason and our Faith in Science

Last updated on: August 24, 2023 at 3:25 pm by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

A Note on Reason and our Faith in Science 2023-08-24T15:25:26-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Newport Beach California Temple at sunset. The Temple is approximately ten minutes away from where I’m currently sitting.
(LDS Media Library public domain photograph)

One of the things that I like most about the place that we stay when we’re here is that it’s only a few minutes away from the Newport Beach Temple. We attended a session there last night (with a friend, her daughter, and her son-in-law), and so this article caught my particular attention when I saw it this morning: “A Deeper Look into the Power of Latter-day Saint Temples: Why do others see Latter-day Saints as so good? Delve into the power of the law of the gospel and how this covenant shapes the lives of Church members and helps them become more like Jesus Christ.”

And there’s food for thought in this piece, as well: “America’s On Again, Off Again Relationship With God: We might not be headed for a godless future — yet.”

I also liked this short essay: “Caring for Creation Is a Biblical Calling”

And I’m more sympathetic to this point of view than, I think, some would imagine me to be: “Quantum physics reveals the unity of the universe: Reviving ancient philosophies”

The science library at the University of California at Irvine is located only a few minutes’ drive from where I’m writing. (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

I want, now, to share with you some thoughts from Roger Trigg, Does science undermine faith? (London: Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, 1918). Roger Trigg is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick and Senior Research Fellow at the Ian Ramsey Centre of the University of Oxford, as well as a Fellow of the International Society for Science and Religion. Among other things, he is the author of Beyond Matter: Why Science Needs Metaphysics, which I own and which I’ve heavily marked up.

We must be wary of too readily accepting the long-established thesis of the intrinsic conflict between science and religion. It does not bear historical examination, in that, for instance, the founders of modern science in the seventeenth century were often motivated by a theistic understanding of the world. Scientists such as the great Isaac Newton, for example, rooted what they saw as ‘natural philosophy’ in a Book of Nature. They saw God as its Author, and the Book was considered to be as informative about God’s world as that other Book, the Bible. Newton declared that ‘the most elegant system of the sun, planets and comets, would not have arisen without the design and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being’. Reference to God was as essential to his natural philosophy as the working of his mathematics. Many of the first participants of the Royal Society, the prestigious scientific institution in London founded in 1660, at the time of the restoration of the monarchy, were strongly motivated in their scientific research by belief in God. The slogan of a group of thinkers called the Cambridge Platonists, who influenced Newton, was ‘reason is the candle of the Lord’. It was not regarded as a blinding searchlight, only a flickering and hesitant flame. Nevertheless, their trust in its illumination for the pursuit of human knowledge was grounded in religious faith. (12-13)

Is the principal focus of science different than that of religion? Trigg says that it is. Of course. But he doesn’t want to go too far in this, to the point that science is about The Real World while religion is purely subjective, making purely personal and subjective claims. To make that concession would deprive religious faith of any actual tether to intersubjective reality

Yet if nothing can count against what we believe, perhaps there is nothing that can count in its favour either. An empty faith that can never be challenged is also one that can never be supported. Faith that cannot be false cannot be true, because it does not seem to be about anything. (14-15)

Science doesn’t deal with meaning and purpose. It concentrates on how things happen, and has little or nothing to say on why they ultimately happen. Trigg grants this. But he does not grant the notion, popularized by the late Harvard paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, that science and religion are totally distinct, that they constitute what Gould termed “non-overlapping magisteria.” Religion, Trigg says, must not be reduced to mere stories that are wholly unconnected with reality, or to trafficking merely in subjective values rather than in objective facts.

Do humans have intrinsic worth? Do they have inalienable rights? If so, science cannot demonstrate them. Are there things or actions that are intrinsically good, or intrinsically evil? If so, science can’t really talk about them in such terms.

Trigg also takes aim at sloppy thinking about the naturalistic, evolutionary origins of human thought, hinting at the idea that, if we see rationality as a coping mechanism that developed in order to aid us in surviving and in transmitting our genes through reproduction, we are sawing off the branch on which we ourselves sit with our purportedly rational ideas:

Yet scientists, too, have use their rational abilities to assess evolutionary theory and its scope. The claims of the theory presuppose a human ability to use reason to recognize what is true. If humans have just evolved to believe in the theory of evolution, there could be no reason to trust it. We may accidentally have hit on the truth or we may not. We would not be in any position to assess our position rationally. If the theory were true, according to its own lights it. would just be its usefulness in helping us to survive and reproduce that makes us believe it.

The very persuasiveness of modern science depends on a view of human reason that has to go beyond science itself. . . . Science . . . cannot exist in its own bubble, but needs presuppositions that have to be grounded elsewhere. The most central of these is a trust in human reason that is not conditioned by circumstance, physiology or whatever. (21)

He is fairly clear about where his own sympathies lie on the question:

The idea that ‘reason is the candle of the Lord’ is a powerful stimulus for respecting and trusting in science. (22)

Posted from Newport Beach, California

Education and Religion

History and Religion

Previous Post

August 23, 2023

Peggy Brown, Dale Brown, and the Cody Wyoming Temple

Next Post

August 25, 2023 “A Mystery to the World”

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"TThe last part of your comment is very telling."

Phil Leaning

Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"Thank you, abc, for the heads up. I thought the link was pretty long, but ..."

John Perry

Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"lol everytime"

TheLastDanite

Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

"Amazing, indeed.Forgive me now for a tangent, but the link you posted contains a series ..."

axelbeingcivil

Beethoven and the Berlin Wall

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city is known as the Holy City, sacred to Jews, Christians, and Muslims?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cairo Athens Jerusalem Rome