Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“An Important New Study of Freemasonry and the Latter-day Saints”

“An Important New Study of Freemasonry and the Latter-day Saints”

Last updated on: January 13, 2023 at 11:16 pm by Dan Peterson

0 Comments

“An Important New Study of Freemasonry and the Latter-day Saints” 2023-01-13T23:16:01-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Madrid Spain Temple was dedicated in 1999. (LDS Media Library)

A new article — this one a review essay — went up earlier today in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship. As with all of the other journal articles that we’ve published over the past nearly 10.5 years, it is available to all and sundry at absolutely no charge:

“An Important New Study of Freemasonry and the Latter-day Saints: What’s Good, What’s Questionable, and What’s Missing in Method Infinite,” written by Jeffrey M. Bradshaw

Review of Cheryl L. Bruno, Joe Steve Swick III, and Nicholas S. Literski, Method Infinite: Freemasonry and the Mormon Restoration (Salt Lake City: Greg Kofford Books, 2022). 544 pages. $44.95 (hardback); $34.95 (softcover).

Abstract: There is much to celebrate in this important new study of Freemasonry and the Latter-day Saints. To their credit, the authors have succeeded in creating a work that is richer than earlier studies of the subject, probing many previously unexplored hints of Masonic influence on Latter-day Saint life and thought from the beginning of the Restoration through the end of the nineteenth century. That said, the book’s dauntingly broad survey suffers from uneven quality on some of the many topics it ambitiously tackles. While recognizing the study’s considerable merits, its shortcomings must also be considered. For this reason, I’ve divided this review into three parts: What’s Good, What’s Questionable, and What’s Missing*. I conclude with methodological observations about best practices in the use of the comparative analysis in studies of important and challenging subjects such as this one.*

The Copenhagen Denmark Temple, one of three temples in Scandinavia — the others are in Stockholm and in Helsinki, and a fourth has been announced for Oslo, Norway — was created within and (to a substantial degree) beneath a preexisting Latter-day Saint meetinghouse. (LDS.org)

Some time ago, I read Clifford Williams, Existential Reasons for Belief in God: A Defense of Desires and Emotions for Faith (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2011). Professor Williams, who earned his doctorate at Indiana University, teaches philosophy at Trinity College, in Deerfield, Illinois. Herewith, I undertake to extract a few notes from Existential Reasons for Belief in God:

[T]he two basic ideas of the book are the drawing power of need and the certifying ability of reason. Need without reason is blind, but reason without need is sterile. (12)

Early in the book, Williams sets out to identity what he terms “existential needs.” And, first among them, he lists “self-directed needs” (as opposed to “other-directed needs”). These are

cosmic security
beyond the grave
heaven
goodness
a larger life
to be loved
meaning
to be forgiven

About the first and second of these “needs,” he says,

We cannot possess cosmic security unless we also believe that we will live beyond the grave. Imagine . . . that we are alone, thinking of the rest of our life. When we were young, the rest of our life was an indefinitely extended future — we could not see the end then. Now that we are older, perhaps over forty or fifty, we can picture our life as a definite span. When we picture this finite span to ourselves, we ask, “Is this all there is to life — my life? I began a certain time so many years ago, and I will end only so many years from now. How can this be? (22)

Then he proceeds to the third “need” on his list:

But it is not mere existence that we want after we die. We want a certain kind of existence. We want one that is free from the hazards of this life, free, that is, from misfortune that is out of our control — from the ravages of the cancer that may slowly kill us, from the misshapen body that embarrasses us. We want rest from the constant effort needed simply to pay bills. And we also want a different kind of rest — from the effort required to battle temptation and from the emotional pain that our parents caused us by their unjustified criticisms or lack of love. We do not want any more anxiety about the future. We want an inner contentment that is not punctured by bouts of depression.

Perhaps it would be more accurate to call this need for heaven a longing. It is less a conscious need than a wistful yearning. We feel it vaguely instead of explicitly, and fleetingly instead of continuously. Perhaps, even, we do not recognize it as a desire for heaven. It is simply s craving for something different from what we now experience. (23)

Williams’s list of “other-directed needs” includes

to love
awe
delighting in goodness
being present [i.e., simply being with those whom we love]
justice and fairness

It is important, from Williams’s perspective, to distinguish genuine “needs” from mere “desires.” He observes that needs are often regarded as being felt more intensely, more imperatively than are desires — though he also recognizes that the intensity will vary from one person to another.

The basic form of what I am calling the existential argument for believing in God is this:

We need cosmic security. We need to know that we will live beyond the grave in a state that is free from the defects of this life, a state that is full of goodness and justice. We need a more expansive life, one in which we love and are loved. We need meaning, and we need to know that we are forgiven for going astray. We also need to experience awe, to delight in goodness and to be present with those we love.

Faith in God satisfies those needs.

Therefore, we are justified in having faith in God. . . .

Kierkegaard finds needs that he thinks can be satisfied through faith. We are sick at heart and need to be free from the torment it produces. We sorrow, are burdened with care, labor in futility, and need rest for our souls. We have lost our innocence and need to be saved from the sharp distress of guilt. We can have these needs met, Kierkegaard declares, by accepting Jesus’ invitation to give us rest: “Come here, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will give you rest.” (32-33)

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Existential Reasons for Belief in God

Jeffrey Mark Bradshaw

Previous Post

January 12, 2023

"Written records of biblical King David discovered by researchers," plus the "Drake Equation"

Next Post

January 14, 2023 Lightning Strikes

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"DP: “But Mr. Sutherland worries about the fact that our time, when we can communicate ..."

Theodore Brandley

Learning more about a region of ..."

"Another class of memories are of individuals who previously lived. Some of these remembered individuals ..."

PlasmaMiasma

Accounts of Premortality?

"Sutherland's lecture sounds interesting. He seems to restate the Washington consensus that trade brings peace ..."

B. Wilson

Learning more about a region of ..."

"In a meeting today, I learned another important reason why accurate (or at least as ..."

the PROBLEM

From Serbia’s “White City,” Belgrade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Isaac's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sarah Rebekah Rachel Leah