Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Science, Religion, Agency, and Flowers

Science, Religion, Agency, and Flowers

Last updated on: December 8, 2022 at 9:31 pm by Dan Peterson

Science, Religion, Agency, and Flowers 2022-12-08T21:31:13-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A field of flowers in southern California (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Newly posted today on the website of the Interpreter Foundation:

Conference Talks: “Science, Religion, and Agency,” originally delivered by Richard N. Williams in 2013

Almost all conceptions of human agency are rooted in libertarianism and grounded in a set of assumptions about the nature of the non-human world, the nature of causality, and the nature of determinism. The effect of this is that agency is always understood around two mutually exclusive positions, compatibilism and incompatibilism. Within this intellectual context, human agency is always impossible, trivial, or illusory. Human agency is drawn into discussions of science and religion because most traditional “scientific” notions of causality and determination are understood in ways that make agency impossible, and most religious positions try to reconcile themselves to the classical libertarian position, which is self-contradictory. The presentation proposed here argues for a new understanding of human agency which requires a rethinking of causality and determinism that is compatible with science. And a refutation of agency that most religious positions unwisely endorse. Agency turns out to be not so much a matter of free choice, but of a deeper matter of the nature of the human world, human ontology, and truth. The lack of clarity on issues of science, religion, and agency comes not from science or religion, but from a faulty dogmatic scientism and the naturalistic metaphysic it always imposes on intellectual discourse.

***

A few weeks ago, I was approached by someone from the management of Patheos about being December’s “featured writer” for the platform. It involved answering two questions (see below). The audience for the little “featured writer” item is the other writers at Patheos, across all of the faith positions (and unfaith positions) represented on the site. Below, I append what I wrote. I was trying to be short, but I wasn’t quite sure about the desired length, so my answers below ended up being somewhat abbreviated. Which is fine. Here, though, on my own blog, I can be every bit as prolix as I’m inclined to be:

What do you enjoy about writing for Patheos?

I had a difficult time as an undergraduate student. I always enrolled in too many classes but, even then, had a hard time focusing on them because . . . well, because there were just too many other interesting classes to sit in on, and too many lectures and concerts, and too many books in the library. “Maybe I should be an economist, or a mathematician.” “Or a philosopher.” “Or an astronomer.” College and what my college campus regularly offered were, for me, an enormous and enormously tempting smörgåsbord. My grades weren’t always what they should have been. Still, I managed somehow not only to graduate (in classical Greek and philosophy) but to go on to a doctorate (in Near Eastern languages and cultures) and, thereafter, to a university faculty appointment.

But the Wanderlust or catholicity (or, perhaps, the mere lack of disciplined focus) persists. Which is probably a major reason why I find blogging so gratifying: No editor. No giver of grades. I can spout off on any topic that interests me, from theological and philosophical questions through ancient history and scriptural interpretations to current events and controversies and even restaurant, travel, and movie recommendations.

I’ve been a teacher for most of my adult life, not only in higher education and in church but in scores and scores of public lectures on every inhabited continent. In recent years, I’ve frequently led tours in the Near East and Europe. I love sharing and discussing ideas.

And there are no ideas more important than those connected with God, religion, faith, and the meaning of it all. I’ve always loved the eighteenth-century lyrics of Isaac Watts:

Sweet is the work, my God, my King,

To praise thy name, give thanks and sing,

To show thy love by morning light,

And talk of all thy truths at night.

Or, to borrow words from a much more recent song, it’s “a good life, all in all,” to “talk of poems and prayers and promises and things that we believe in.” And that, more than anything else, is what attracted me to the conversations that were possible at Patheos.

What advice do you offer to other Patheos writers?

I don’t know that I’m a particular success at blogging, such that I can advise others. But I can say what I myself do, and how I conceive the “mission” of my blog.

I had actually already launched my blog when a graduated former student who worked for Patheos at the time approached me about bringing it over to this location. I had declined a previous invitation to align my blog with a Latter-day Saint apologetics organization; I wanted to preserve my freedom to write on non-religious topics as well as on religious ones. This representative of Patheos told me that such writing would be acceptable.

So I’ve always felt entirely free to mix things up, to vary my topics. In fact, I’ve been deliberately committed to doing that. I write on what interests me; I really care about the subjects that I discuss. And I can’t imagine that my writing would be very interesting if I didn’t.

There is, surely, a bit of egotism in any writer’s motivating assumption that other people might be interested in what she has to say. But my supposition is that blogs attract continuing audiences not only because of the ideas they discuss but because, to some greater or lesser degree, at least a few people out there are curious about the mind and personality of their authors. So I’ve also felt free to be personal and open, sometimes even to the point, I suppose, of being “vulnerable.”

***

With the recent death of Kirstie Alley, I think it’s an appropriate time to call people’s attention once again to a classic scene from the old sitcom Cheers, of which she was one of the principal stars: “Why can’t Mormons send flowers?” It’s a perennial question.

Previous Post

December 6, 2022

Things Done and Things to Do

Next Post

December 8, 2022 Videos of the Tenth-Birthday Party for the Interpreter Foundation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Israel before the Assyrian conquest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehoahaz Amon Shallum Hoshea