Happy Fourth!

Last updated on: July 5, 2022 at 12:26 am by Dan Peterson

Happy Fourth! 2022-07-05T00:26:17-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mount Rushmore National Memorial, near Rapid City, South Dakota. From left, of course: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln. Candidly, I’ve come to have some reservations about Roosevelt’s inclusion, though some others — e.g., James Madison — probably deserve to be there instead.
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

My father sometimes liked to play a little trick on people. And it was amazing to me how many of them — adults, as well as children — often fell for it.

“Does Canada have a Fourth of July?” he would ask. And a surprising number would reply that, no, only America has a Fourth of July. “Actually,” he would then point out, “Canada does have a fourth of July. It comes right after the third of July, and just before the fifth.”

Today, of course, is the Fourth of July. Which makes it Independence Day in the United States of America. It’s a day of celebration. It should also, I hope, be a day of remembering and of reflection.

I’ve been disturbed, over recent years, by a decline in appreciation for what we might call “the American project.” Such a decline, in my experience anyway, is especially pronounced among younger people. (I’ll probably reserve my thoughts on the mounting distrust toward our national political institutions for another occasion.) There are many reasons for this decline in appreciation. I think that they include the general climate of popular culture, as well as cynicism resulting from the traumatic war in Vietnam and the controversial recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I suspect, too, that attitudes among contemporary American educators and educational materials — at all levels, including elementary schools as well as colleges and universities — have played a pivotal role. We commonly hear that America has been an oppressive place — racist, rapacious, misogynistic, patriarchal, imperialist, homophobic — and, to a very great degree, an actual force for evil.

I lament this trend. I think it deeply misguided. I even think it dangerous, not merely for the United States of America but for the world. As Ronald Reagan famously pointed out during the Cold War, ““If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.”

Does this mean that there are no other free places? Obviously not. Canada, for example, is free. Crossing the border into Canada, one notices no obvious or immediate major differences with regard to personal liberty (nor, for that matter, with regard to much of anything else!). In fact, there are plenty of countries where people are free. As will be apparent to anybody who has followed this blog, I love Switzerland — for many reasons. But one of those reasons is its fierce commitment to its own independence and to the freedom of its people.

And how long would such freedom and such independence survive without the United States? And I’m not speaking only or even primarily about American military power — although the aggressive authoritarianism of Putin’s revanchist Russia and the ambitions of the People’s Republic of China (that is, by the way, still its official name) continue to probe and to challenge our military and would be delighted at its absence — but about a loss of American self-confidence and resolve. If we no longer believe in the value of the American experiment, will freedom and independence continue to flourish elsewhere? I don’t know. I’m uncertain, and I would rather not make the test.

Germans are free. The French and the Italians are free. The Japanese are free. Scandinavia is free. Belgium and the Netherlands are free. But within still-living memory, they were not. Along with much of the rest of Europe, Germany was controlled by the monstrous evil of the Third Reich — and then, after the fall of Hitler, a substantial part of Germany fell under the equally monstrous evil of Soviet and Soviet-directed Communism. (Here, I recommend the superb, Academy-Award-winning 2006 German film Das Leben der Anderen, which is available in English as The Lives of Others.) Within still-living memory, France and Norway and Denmark and Belgium and the Netherlands were under Nazi occupation, Italy was under the control of Mussolini’s Fascism, and Japan served as the base for a lethal militaristic tyranny that operated in global league with the Nazis. America was vital to their liberation.

Residents of the United Kingdom are free. But at the end of the 1930s and in the early part of the 1940s, they were seriously threatened by the forces of Hitler’s Germany. Without the assistance of the United States, how would they have fared?

I’m entirely in favor of correcting naïvely, even dishonestly, boosterish oversimplifications of American history. Slavery was a crime not only against black people but against our fundamental founding principles, as was government-imposed or -supported segregation. Native Americans suffered terrible injustices at the hands of European Americans. And the American flirtation with naked, unashamed, overt colonialism and imperialism that began in the late nineteenth century led to many actions by individual leaders and, sometimes, by America itself, that make me blush today because they so plainly violated the ideals of our democratic-republican Founders. (Daniel Immerwahr’s How to Hide an Empire: A Short History of the Greater United States is both a real eye-opener and profoundly humbling, even though, reading it, I’m not certain that we could have altogether avoided that phase of our history under the international conditions of the time. Unfortunately, though, folks like Teddy Roosevelt went in for American colonialism with what seems to me a rather unseemly gusto.)

We need to see our history honestly and clearly; only then can we improve. Claims that our nation is perfect have no support in our history, and should have none in our patriotism or our politics or our self-understanding. Do we not, after all, when we sing to “America the Beautiful,” pray that “God shed His grace on thee, and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea! . . . God mend thine every flaw! . . . May God thy gold refine till all success be nobleness, and every gain divine”? America is a place for mending, for refinement. Not for reviling or rejection.

The United States have been, overall, a force for vast good in the world. (Please note the plural verb. It’s deliberate here, and was once standard — as, indeed, it is strictly grammatical.) I repeat that: America has been a very great force for good. My Scandinavian immigrant paternal grandparents certainly thought so. And so did many millions of others like them. The problem seems to me that many modern critics of this nation unfairly compare it to a never-realized utopian ideal and — inevitably — find it wanting. Compare it more reasonably to the history of previous states, though, or to the more recent history of its post-1776 contemporaries — to Mexico, say, or Cambodia, or Paraguay, or Brazil, or Rwanda, or South Africa, or Belgium, or India, or Japan, or China, or Russia, or Germany, or Peru, or France, or Korea, or Cuba, or Nigeria, or even the United Kingdom — and the historical flaws of America come into a very different perspective. We don’t fare well when compared with Wakanda, but we do quite a bit better when contrasted with Uganda.

P.S.: We’re just back from watching Top Gun: Maverick. A kind of paean to the American military, it seemed an appropriate thing to see on American Independence Day and, anyway, we may be among the last people in the United States to have seen it. When I first heard that it was coming, I feared that it would be a pathetic sequel in which Tom Cruise sought to retain his youth a little too late. But it wasn’t. I began noticing favorable reviews and, since returning from Europe, hearing really positive comments from friends, and it turned out to be very well done for the kind of movie it is. Those who made it cleverly never identify the “rogue state” that is central to the movie’s plot and we never actually see any of their faces, so there are no ethnic clues. For most of the film, the visuals led me to expect it to be a Middle Eastern country. Later, though, it was very clear that my expectation was wrong.

In any event, I wish everybody a happy fourth of July. Even those of you who may be in Canada. (And, for folks in Australia and New Zealand and Japan who have already left 4 July 2022 behind, I hope that you’ll have a good fourth of July in 2023.) We ourselves will be on the road very shortly to join members of our extended family for a holiday barbecue. We’re Americans; accordingly, it’s a day for reflection, remembrance, and celebrations.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 3, 2022

Notes on the Church in Recent Popular Entertainment

Next Post

July 5, 2022 "When change and tears are past, all safe and blessed we shall meet at last."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Jesus Peter James