Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
This coming Friday. Be there, or be somewhere else.

This coming Friday. Be there, or be somewhere else.

Last updated on: March 2, 2022 at 11:49 pm by Dan Peterson

This coming Friday. Be there, or be somewhere else. 2022-03-02T23:49:03-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The cover for the eventual DVD release of “Undaunted” was created by Ryan Knowlton.

***

I would like to remind you of the premiere, this coming Friday evening — 4 March — of the Interpreter Foundation’s new docudrama Undaunted: Witnesses of the Book of Mormon. It will be shown as part of the 2022 LDS Film Festival at the SCERA Theater in Orem, Utah. Undaunted differs from the Witnesses theatrical film in several important respects. For one thing, it includes not only dramatic scenes (some borrowed from Witnesses, but others created especially for this new docudrama) but interviews with various subject experts, both Latter-day Saints and non-Latter-day Saints. For another, whereas Witnesses deals solely with the Three Witnesses of the Book of Mormon, Undaunted extends its coverage to the Eight Witnesses and to the informal or unofficial witnesses (e.g., Mary Musselman Whitmer).

Eventually, Undaunted will be available on DVD and via streaming (as Witnesses already is) in the form of a two-part docudrama that totals approximately 2.5 hours. (A special 90-minute director’s cut will be shown on Friday night, giving a substantial sense of both halves, along with a short feature and some material relating to our next film project.) We have never intended a theatrical release for Undaunted, so it’s very likely that this will be the only opportunity for most people to see the film on a large movie house screen.

Tickets for the premiere of Undaunted: Witnesses of the Book of Mormon are currently available from the 2022 LDS Film Festival, on its website.

***

I share here some passages from a book by Alister McGrath — an Anglican priest who holds three Oxford doctorates: a D.Phil. in molecular biophysics, a D.D. in theology, and a D.Litt. in intellectual history, and who currently occupies the Andreas Idreos Professorship of Science and Religion at the University of Oxford. It’s entitled The Big Question: Why We Can’t Stop Talking about Science, Faith and God (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2015). He is both prodigiously talented and remarkably prolific, and I admire his work very much:

Science is wonderful at raising questions. Some can be answered immediately; some will be answerable in the future through technological advance; and some will lie beyond its capacity to answer — what my scientific hero Sir Peter Medawar (1915-87) referred to as “questions that science cannot answer and that no conceivable advance of science would empower it to answer.” What Medawar has in mind are what the philosopher Karl Popper called “ultimate questions,” such as the meaning of life. So does acknowledging and engaging such questions mean abandoning science? No. It simply means respecting its limits and not forcing it to become something other than science. (3)

He turns to the writing of the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset (1883-1955):

Any philosophy of life, any way of thinking about the questions that really matter, according to Ortega, will thus end up going beyond science — not because there is anything wrong with science, but precisely because its intellectual virtues are won at a price: science works so well because it is so focused and specific in its methods.

Scientific truth is characterized by its precision and the certainty of its predictions. But science achieves these admirable qualities at the cost of remaining on the level of secondary concerns, leaving ultimate and decisive questions untouched.

For Ortega, the great intellectual virtue of science is that it knows its limits. It only answers questions that it knows it can answer on the basis of the evidence. . . . [Ortega:] “We are given no escape from ultimate questions. In one way or another they are in us, whether we like it or not. Scientific truth is exact, but it is incomplete.” (4)

McGrath himself is a former atheist. Here’s an autobiographical note:

So I embraced a rather dogmatic atheism, taking delight in its intellectual minimalism and existential bleakness. So what if life had to be seen as meaningless? It was an act of intellectual bravery on my part to accept this harsh scientific truth. Religion was just a pointless relic of a credulous past, offering a spurious delusion of meaning which was easily discarded. I believed that science offered a complete, totalized explanation of the world, ruthlessly exposing its rivals as lies and delusions. Science disproved God, and all honest scientists were atheists. Science was good, and religion was evil. (5)

[T]his “science versus religion” narrative is stale, outdated and largely discredited. It is sustained not by the weight of evidence but merely by its endless uncritical repetition, which studiously avoids the scholarship of the last generation that has undermined its credibility. . . . The “warfare of science and religion” narrative has had its day. (16, 20)

[T]he New Atheism prefers to ridicule religious people rather than engage seriously with religious ideas. Its rhetoric of dismissal allows it to present its ignorance of religious ideas as an intellectual virtue, when it is simply an arrogant excuse to avoid thinking. (20-21)

It is certainly true that science, if it is to be science and not something else, is committed to a method that is often styled “methodological naturalism.” That is the way that science works. That is what is characteristic of science, and it both provides science with its rigor and sets its limits. Science has established a set of tested and reliable rules by it investigates reality, and “methodological materialism” is one of them.

But science is about setting rules for exploring reality, not limiting reality to what can be explored in this way. It does not for one moment mean that science is committed to some kind of philosophical materialism. Some materialists argue that the explanatory successes of science imply an underlying ontological materialism. Yet this is simply one of several ways of interpreting this approach, and there are others with widespread support within the scientific community. Eugenie Scott, then director of the National Center for Science Education, made this point neatly back in 1993: “Science neither denies nor opposes the supernatural, but ignores the supernatural for methodological reasons.” Science is a non-theistic, not an anti-theistic, way of engaging reality. As the philosopher Alvin Plantinga so rightly observes, if there is any conflict between “science” and “faith,” it is really between a dogmatic metaphysical naturalism and belief in God. (19)

Слава Україні!

Uncategorized

Alister McGrath

Book of Mormon

Book of Mormon Witnesses

Undaunted: Witnesses of the Book of Mormon

Witnesses

Witnesses film

Witnesses of the Book of Mormon

Previous Post

February 28, 2022

"Putin! Putin! Putin!"

Next Post

March 2, 2022 A scientist at MIT against scientism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who declared, "Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joshua Gideon Moses Aaron