Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“A Deeper Understanding of the Temple in 175 Entries”

“A Deeper Understanding of the Temple in 175 Entries”

Last updated on: February 15, 2022 at 9:51 pm by Dan Peterson

“A Deeper Understanding of the Temple in 175 Entries” 2022-02-15T21:51:00-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On the grounds of Hawaii’s second temple, which overlooks the town of Kona on the western side of the Big Island of Hawaii (LDS Media Library)

***

A new review article appeared earlier today in Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship:

“A Deeper Understanding of the Temple in 175 Entries,” by David M. Calabro

Review of Donald W. Parry, 175 Temple Symbols and Their Meanings (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2020). 310 pages. $26.99 (hardcover).

Abstract: In a must-have book written for a Latter-day Saint audience, Donald Parry offers profound insights into 175 features of ancient and modern temples, including architectural features, aspects of ritual, and temple-related doctrine.

***

Here are a couple of passages from the late Hugh Nibley that I love:

We are pushed onto this earthly stage in the middle of the play that has been going on for thousands of years; we want to play an intelligent part and, in whispers, ask some of the older actors what this is all about—what are we supposed to be doing? And we soon learn that they know as little about it as we do.

Who can tell us the plot of the play? The sophic mind assures us that the play is simply a product of lighting, rocks, and wind and has no plot aside from the plots we invent for it. In that book things just happen—and there is no way of proving that that is not so. The mystic makes a virtue of the incomprehensibility of the whole thing; he submerges himself in the darkness of unknowing and wallows in his self-induced and self-dramatizing mood of contradictions: he is strictly a sophic, not a mantic, product.

The mantic admits that the play is incomprehensible to people of as little knowledge and experience as ours and insists for that reason that if we are to know anything at all about it, our knowledge must come from a higher source, by revelation. According to the mantic way of thinking, things do not just happen—and there is absolutely no way of proving that that is not so. The same starry heavens that have supplied the mantic with irrefutable proof since time immemorial that things do not just happen have always been the most self-evident proof in the world to the sophic that things do just happen.

“Sophic and Mantic,” CWHN 10:370-71

Literature and art can help us enjoy or endure the play (of life), but cannot, by their own confession, tell us what it is about. Science as such confines itself rigorously to examining the props on the stage—measuring and describing tangible objects. It renounces the goal of comprehending the play as a whole. Philosophy would like to tell us what the play is about, but will not allow itself to run out of scientific bounds; it remains a scavenger in the camp of science. Religion alone can, if anything can, tell us the plot of the play from beginning to end—the eschatology without which it has no meaning. Even the layman cannot be indifferent (because):

a) We were made that way; we cannot rest until we know what it is all about (Aristotle, Augustine).

b) Indifference to eschatology is the mark of sterile societies, and can even be dangerous (Avicenna).

c) It is the unknown that appeals most: science and art can only promise more of the same; religion alone has the excitement of infinite possibilities (Whitehead).

Eschatology is not philosophy, ethics, or aesthetics. It deals exclusively with things that really happen.

“Eschatology,” 1-2

***

I did some rummaging for you the other day in the infinitely capacious Christopher Hitchens Memorial “How Religion Poisons Everything” File© but then, unfortunately, allowed myself to become a bit sidetracked and failed to share my discoveries. So, remembering that, for some of my readers at least, the outrages and depravities committed by theism have no time stamp or sell-by date — e.g., modern Quakers are very nearly as responsible for the Inquisition and the Crusades as the actual perpetrators were — I’m going to share them here despite the delay:

“Food Donations for Local Charities Received by Missouri Governor: More than 100,000 pounds of food donated through Latter-day Saint Charities”

“How Properly Fitted Wheelchairs Are Blessing Lives in South Africa”

“Elder Nattress Shares How Individuals Can Assist the People of Tonga Following Natural Disaster”

“Tongan Emergency Updates: 26 January Update: Communication opens up, humanitarian aid delivery and local clean-up continues”

On a different but still Hitchens-appropriate note, I found this of interest:

“The Believer’s Brain: The Awakened Brain: The New Science of Spirituality and Our Quest for an Inspired Life, by Lisa Miller (Random House, 288 pp., $28)”

A quotation from the review: “[R]ates of psychopathology in adolescents are tremendously diminished through religious attachment. It turns out that teens actively involved in a church, temple, or mosque are less likely to drop out of school, self-harm, or suffer from despair. And if the goal is to prevent out-of-wedlock childbirth, it seems that religion is a powerful prophylactic. . . . [F]aith can alleviate despair.”

And, by the way, it appears that I’m sometimes not alone there in the Hitchens File. I’ve occasionally run into Dr. Lynn Johnson, who often comments here. He has kindly shared the following two items with me, which I now pass on to you:

“Religious Coping as Moderator of Psychological Responses to Stressful Events: A Longitudinal Study”

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of positive and negative religious coping with posttraumatic symptoms (PTS) and growth (PTG). Their moderating role was also examined among predictors such as social support and the subjective severity of event with PTS and PTG. Two hundred and eleven Chilean adults (58.3% women) of 18 years and older who had been exposed to highly stressful were surveyed. The Brief-RCOPE, the Brief-COPE subscale of social support, the Subjective Severity of Event Scale, and a socio-demographic questionnaire were used as measurements at time one. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-short form (PTGI-SF) and Short Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview (SPRINT-E) was used to collect baseline scores and six months after. The results show that negative religious coping predicts the increase in PTS, positive religious coping predicts the increase in PTG and plays a moderation role: at low levels of positive religious coping it was found a strong association between coping by seeking social support and PTG, while at high level the association is weak. These results are discussed in the framework of the functionality of positive and negative religious coping and its role in adjusting to potentially traumatic events. . . .

This article examines the role of religiosity and religious coping (RC) when adjusting to traumatic events, both in attenuation of symptoms and favouring positive effects of growth. . . . Reviewed studies suggest the potential role of RC as a moderator between adjustment and others forms of coping like social support and also suggest that RC is different from other forms of coping—like coping by seeking social support.

There is evidence indicating that religiosity helps to cope with highly stressful or potentially traumatic events.

“Blessed assurance: Religion, anxiety, and tranquility among US adults”

A growing body of research investigates the possible relationships between religion and mental health. After developing a series of arguments linking various aspects of religion with anxiety and tranquility, we test relevant hypotheses using data from the 1996 General Social Survey. Results show that frequency of religious attendance and the belief in an afterlife are inversely associated with feelings of anxiety and positively associated with feelings of tranquility. However, frequency of prayer has no direct association with either outcome. Strong beliefs in the pervasiveness of sin are positively linked with anxiety but unrelated to tranquility. Finally, belief in an afterlife and frequency of prayer buffer the adverse effects of poor health and ﬁnancial decline on anxiety. Implications of these ﬁndings are discussed along with study limitations and promising directions for future research.

Posted from Ko Olina, Oahu, Hawaii

Uncategorized

brain

Calabro

Christopher Hitchens Memorial "How Religion Poisons Everything" File

Previous Post

February 4, 2022

Supportive, but Not Conclusive

Next Post

February 5, 2022 Progress, Science, and Religion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who replaced Haman as the king's chief adviser?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezra Zerubbabel Mordecai Sanballat