Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
The Origin of Life on Earth: An Insoluble Problem?

The Origin of Life on Earth: An Insoluble Problem?

Last updated on: December 29, 2020 at 8:23 pm by Dan Peterson

The Origin of Life on Earth: An Insoluble Problem? 2020-12-29T20:23:43-07:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A tidal pool on the southern coast of New South Wales, Australia. Charles Darwin proposed that life on Earth may have begun in just such a place.
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

Among the millions of distinct species on our planet, even the simplest forms of organic life are astoundingly complex. As the outspokenly atheistic Oxford zoologist and science popularizer Richard Dawkins is said to have observed, the information contained in the DNA of just the cell nucleus of one unicellular amoeba exceeds the information contained in an entire thirty-volume set of the Encyclopedia Britannica. (Some of you will remember what an encyclopedia was, and what it looked like. Anyway, the comparison is impressive and striking.). But he didn’t stop there. If, he said, you were to consider the DNA of the entire amoeba, not merely of its cell nucleus, you would find the equivalent of the information contained in a thousand such encyclopedia sets, not randomly arranged but formulated in very specific sequences of data written in the four-“letter” code ATGC, representing the “bases” adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine.

Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, has reportedly compared the information in DNA to a computer software program, but a software program far more complicated than anything ever developed by human beings. Such a comparison raises an obvious question, though: If you were somehow to come across a previously unknown computer software program — just for fun, let’s have it come from Microsoft — would you seriously entertain the thought that it had come into existence by simple chance, with neither design nor designer?

I share with you some interesting quotations that are worthy of consideration. I hasten to clarify that, in these quotations, which are reading notes of mine toward a project on which I’m working, I’m not necessarily setting forth my own position, and I’m certainly rejecting neither the geological antiquity of the Earth, nor the great age of life upon it, nor the concept of biological evolution.

In the speculations on the origin of life, the most difficult conceptual problems deal with the complexity of the first organism. [Hyman Hartman, Journal of Molecular Evolution 4 [1975], 359. Hyman Hartman is currently a research scientist in the Department of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and director of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Biology, in Berkeley, California.]

Science, you might say, has discovered that our existence is infinitely improbable, and hence a miracle. [John Horgan, director of the Center for Science Writings at New Jersey’s Stevens Institute of Technology, as cited by Lee Strobel, The Case for the Creator (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004), 42]

Precious little in the way of biochemical evolution could have happened on the Earth. It is easy to show that the two thousand or so enzymes that span the whole of life could not have evolved on the Earth. [Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, “Where Microbes Boldly Went,” New Scientist 91 [13 August 1991], 412-415. Sir Fred Hoyle [1915-2001], affiliated for most of his career with Cambridge University, was one of the greatest astronomers and astrophysicists of the twentieth century, and, at the time that the article appeared, his former Cambridge doctoral student Nalin Chandra Wickramasinghe was a professor of applied mathematics and astronomy at the University of Cardiff, in Wales.]

It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other. And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means. [Leslie Orgel, “The Origin of Life on the Earth,” Scientific American 271 (October 1994), 78. The British chemist Leslie Orgel (1927-2007) was a professor of chemistry at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, and at the nearby University of California, San Diego, who specialized in questions pertaining to the origin of terrestrial life.]

An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going. [Francis Crick, Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981), 88. The vocally atheistic British theoretical molecular biologist Francis Crick (1916-2004), co-discoverer with James Watson of the double-helix structure of the DNA molecule and co-winner with Watson and Maurice Wilkins of the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, served for the last years of his life, right up until his death, as the J.W. Kieckhefer Distinguished Research Professor at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California.]

Although at the beginning the paradigm was worth consideration, now the entire effort in the primeval soup paradigm is self-deception [maintained solely] on the ideology of its champions. [Hubert Yockey, Information Theory and Molecular Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 336. Hubert Yockey (1916-2016) was a physicist and information theorist who worked under J. Robert Oppenheimer on the Manhattan Project and, thereafter, at the University of California, Berkeley. He believed that the origin of life is unsolvable as a scientific problem.]

It’s partly on the basis of such considerations that Stephen Meyer, a prominent advocate of intelligent design, declares that “most biologists who specialize in origin-of-life research now reject chance as a possible explanation for the origin of the information in DNA and proteins.” [Stephen Meyer, “Evidence for Design in Physics and Biology,” 53-111, in Michael Behe, William Dembski, and Stephen Meyer, eds., Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2000), 73]

Naturalistic mechanisms are incapable of generating the highly specific, information-rich structures that pervade biology. Organisms display the hallmarks of intelligently engineered high-tech systems — information storage and transfer, functioning codes, sorting and delivery systems, self-regulation and feedback loops, signal-transduction circuitry — and everywhere, complex arrangements of mutually interdependent and well-fitted parts that work in concert to perform a function. [William A. Dembski, The Design Revolution (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2004), 63. William Dembski, long a pillar in the intelligent design movement, is the son of an evolutionary biologist who had earned an Sc.D. at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. He himself holds a Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Chicago, as well as a master’s degree from Princeton Theological Seminary.]

J. Robert Oppenheimer

Previous Post

December 28, 2020

Martin Harris Testifies in Smithfield, plus "Medieval Christian Views of Hebrew as the Language of Magic"

Next Post

December 30, 2020 On Witnesses to Extraordinary Events

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am twelve stones taken from a riverbed and set up as a memorial to a miraculous crossing. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Altar stones The memorial stones The Stones of remembrance Bethel