Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

“Doing science a disservice”

Last updated on: October 3, 2020 at 12:26 pm   by Dan Peterson

“Doing science a disservice” 2020-10-03T12:26:20-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

Like Einstein before him, Freeman Dyson was long associated with Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study, shown here in an aerial photograph by Hanno Rein.  (Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

 

Back on 21 November 2006, the astoundingly productive Anglo-Irish theologian Alister McGrath delivered a speech in New York City under the perhaps rather cheeky title “The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World.”  Armed with Oxford University doctorates in both divinity and intellectual history and — even prior to those — in molecular biophysics, Dr. McGrath is exceptionally well positioned to comment upon matters at the interface of religion and science.  The text of his speech, as well as the introduction that preceded it and the questions and answers that followed it, appears between pages 235 and 267 of Eric Metaxas, ed., Life, God, and Other Small Topics: Conversations from Socrates in the City (New York: Plume/Penguin, 2011). 

 

Here’s a passage from that speech.  In it, Dr. McGrath refers, of course, to the Oxford evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (1941-), who has become famous as a zealous advocate of the so-called “New Atheism.”  However, he also alludes to the sadly short-lived Harvard evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002), also personally an unbeliever, whose essays and best-selling books were far more charitable to religious belief than those of Dawkins, and to the eminent Anglo-American mathematician and theoretical physicist Freeman Dyson (1923-2020), of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, who publicly identified himself as a Christian: 

 

Stephen J. Gould, who died recently of lung cancer, had some very interesting things to say.  In his book Rocks of Ages, he argues that science simply cannot, by the legitimate application of its methods, decide the God question one way or the other.  I think most scientists would think that is the case.  Now, again, Richard Dawkins does not think that that is the case.  He argues that real scientists ought to be atheists, and, therefore, I regret to say, challenges the scientific credentials of people like Freeman Dyson for daring to take an interest in religion and occasionally saying something nice about it.

If I could express a real concern here . . .  You know, I love the sciences.  I think they are wonderful, but, if you say, as Dawkins does, that science entails atheism, which everyone knows isn’t the case, then actually what you are going to do is persuade a large body of religious people that science is off-limits, and I don’t think that’s right.  I think that the position of science in our culture is so precarious that if you actually imply that it’s antireligious, then it’s going to lose its support at a moment in history when it needs all the support it can get.  And, therefore, I want to say that Richard Dawkins is doing science a disservice by portraying it in this way.  (252-253)

 

On 16 April 2015, by the way, the New York Times published an interview with Freeman Dyson, entitled “Freeman Dyson: By the Book.”  In it, he was asked “What books might we be surprised to find on your shelves?”  He replied, “‘The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ.’ I treasure it because some of my best friends are Mormons, and the book tells a dramatic story in a fine biblical style. The reader has to wait with growing tension almost until the end of the story to reach the final climax, when Jesus arrives in America and founds his second kingdom here.”

 

 

Uncategorized

Alister McGrath

Book of Mormon

Dawkins

Duke

Eric Metaxas

Freeman Dyson

Gould

Harvard

Institute for Advanced Study

McGrath

Princeton

Richard Dawkins

science

Stephen Jay Gould

University

Previous Post



October 2, 2020

Religion and Health, With Data from the Sciences

Next Post



October 3, 2020 Revision 5.20 "What the West Owes the East” (A Word Sampler, Part 3)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why was it significant that Jesus spoke to a Samaritan woman at the well?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It was raining She was a prophet She was wealthy Jews typically avoided Samaritans

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Of Pottery and People

Sic et Non

Family

"Out of small things proceedeth that which is...

Sic et Non

Family

Some notes on the archaeology of the Bible

Sic et Non

Family

A case of twin near-death experiences?

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube