Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

“God is a mathematician of a very high order”

Last updated on: September 26, 2020 at 9:13 pm   by Dan Peterson

“God is a mathematician of a very high order” 2020-09-26T21:13:32-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

Dirac, by Ewald

A 1939 portrait of Paul A. M. Dirac, by Clara Ewald
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

 

Carlo Rovelli, in his Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity, translated by Simon Carnell and Erica Segre (Penguin, 2017), offers a fascinating though brief portrait of the English theoretician Paul A. M. Dirac (1902-1984), who, he says, is “considered by many to be the greatest physicist of the twentieth century after Einstein” (101).  Dirac, who was famously inept, socially speaking, and possibly autistic, was no friend of “religion” and was a vocal critic of (at least conventional ideas of) God.

 

But he was deeply, almost mystically, committed to mathematics, and he was quite willing to use the term God in that connection.   Writes Rovelli,

 

His physics has the pristine clarity of a song.  For him, the world is not made of things, it’s constituted of an abstract mathematical structure which shows us how things appear and how they behave when manifesting themselves.  It’s a magical encounter between logic and intuition.  (102)

 

Here are some quotations from Dirac that I’ve noted.  I have the original sources for some of them, but will need to track the others down:

 

The mathematician plays a game in which he himself invents the rules while the physicist plays a game in which the rules are provided by nature, but as time goes on it becomes increasingly evident that the rules which the mathematician finds interesting are the same as those which nature has chosen.

 

God is a mathematician of a very high order and He used advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.

 

It’s more important to have beauty in one’s equations than to have them fit experiment. . . .  It seems that if one is working from the point of view of getting beauty in one’s equations, and if one has really a sound insight, one is on a sure line of progress.  If there is not complete agreement between the results of one’s work and experiment, one should not allow oneself to be too discouraged, because the discrepancy may well be due to minor features that are not properly taken into account and that will get cleared up with further developments of the theory.  (“The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature,” Scientific American [May 1963], 47)

 

Theoretical physicists accept the need for mathematical beauty as an act of faith. . . .  For example, the main reason why the theory of relativity is so universally accepted is its mathematical beauty.  (“Methods in Theoretical Physics,’ in A Life of Physics: Evening Lectures at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.  A Special Supplement of the IAEA Bulletin [1968], 22)

 

He seems to have believed in the importance of intuition for scientific progress or, to put it in Latter-day Saint terms, in personal inspiration or even revelation:

 

I found the best ideas usually came, not when one was actively striving for them, but when one was in a more relaxed state. . . .  I used to take long solitary walks on Sundays, during which I tended to review the current situation in a leisurely way.  Such occasions often proved fruitful, even though (or perhaps, because) the primary purpose of the walk was relaxation and not research.  (“Methods in Theoretical Physics,’ in A Life of Physics: Evening Lectures at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.  A Special Supplement of the IAEA Bulletin [1968], 24)

 

 

Uncategorized

beauty

data

Dirac

empiricism

equations

experiment

fact

facts

God

inspiration

intuition

math

mathematician

mathematics

Paul

physicist

physics

revelation

theoretical

theory

Previous Post



September 26, 2020

Revision 5.13 "What the West Owes the East" (Mathematics)

Next Post



September 26, 2020 Did David Whitmer heft the golden plates?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James states that the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

In my best fourteenth-century English

Sic et Non

Family

Racial Harmony After the Priesthood Ban

Sic et Non

Family

Created or Discovered? (Part Two)

Sic et Non

Family

Created or Discovered? (Part One)

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

Swimfan: Forgotten Aughts Pleasures

This is a recovery effort. In 2002, My Big Fat Greek Wedding...

Top Three Anti-Catholic Lies About Catholicism

  This is my initial transcript for the video, "THE 3 WORST...

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube