Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“Did Joseph Smith Rely on Adam Clarke’s Bible Commentary? Forthcoming Article Says “No.””

“Did Joseph Smith Rely on Adam Clarke’s Bible Commentary? Forthcoming Article Says “No.””

Last updated on: August 22, 2020 at 5:30 pm by Dan Peterson

“Did Joseph Smith Rely on Adam Clarke’s Bible Commentary? Forthcoming Article Says “No.”” 2020-08-22T17:30:53-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I saw this iconic view of the Jungfrau from Interlaken, Switzerland, many times during the seven months of my mission that I served there, and I’ve seen it more than a few times during numerous visits since. But it’s definitely not an everyday guarantee. That’s why Switzerland is so beautifully green. (Irrelevant but beautiful public domain image from Wikimedia Commons.)

This heads-up appeared a short while ago on the website of the Interpreter Foundation:

“Jackson Article Preview — Did Joseph Smith Use Adam Clarke?”

And this appeared today, as well:

Audio Roundtable: Come, Follow Me Book of Mormon Lesson 34 “Remember the Lord” (Helaman 7-12)

This Interpreter Radio Roundtable (for Come, Follow Me Book of Mormon Lesson 34, “Remember the Lord,” on Helaman 7-12) featured Steve Densley, Matthew Bowen, Mark Johnson, and J. Ward Moody. The roundtable was extracted, shorn of commercial and other interruptions, from the 28 June 2020 broadcast of the Interpreter Radio Show. The complete program may be heard at https://interpreterfoundation.org/interpreter-radio-show-june-28-2020/.

And this appeared, from Jonn Claybaugh:

“Helaman 7 The Burden of a Prophet”

Come, Follow Me — Study and Teaching Helps: Lesson 34, August 24-30: Helaman 7-12 — “Remember the Lord”

***

You might find this of interest:

“Egyptologist Provides Thoughts on Pearl of Great Price Central”

***

Two new entries from the Neville-Neville Land blog:

“Simple answers to an obvious question”

“Elder Anthony W. Ivins, M2C Intellectual”

***

Some years ago, I was irritated by a gratuitous insult to my faith in Thomas Cahill’s otherwise interesting book How the Irish Saved Civilization. While discussing the ancient Iranian-born religion of Manichaeism, now long gone but once (for a few centuries) a serious rival to Christianity, Cahill suddenly, out of the blue, compared it to “Mormonism” and to the doctrine of Jehovah’s Witnesses. All three, he said, are shallow and superficial faiths, “full of assertions . . . but yield[ing] no intellectual system to nourish a great intellect.”

I thought this remarkably unfair. While Jehovah’s Witnesses have been noted over many decades for their disdain for higher education, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have, to put it mildly, not been so known. Indeed, as far back, at least, as Kenneth R. Hardy’s “Social Origins of American Scientists and Scholars,” Science 185 (9 August 1974): 497-506, it’s been recognized that Latter-day Saints are disproportionately represented in scholarship and the sciences. (See also this article, by sociologists Stan Albrecht and Tim Heaton.) There exists, so far as I’m aware, no Jehovah’s Witness analogue to, say, the Association for Mormon Letters, the Association of Mormon Counselors and Psychotherapists, the Mormon History Association, the Academy for Temple Studies, Mormon Scholars in the Humanities, the Mormon Social Science Association, the Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology, The Interpreter Foundation, the European Mormon Studies Association, nor even, for that matter, to Brigham Young University (in its three campuses at Provo, Rexburg, and Laie) or LDS Business College (very shortly to become Ensign College) or Southern Virginia University. The Interpreter Foundation has sponsored two conferences thus far — and hopes to sponsor others — dedicated to Mormonism and science. I’m aware of no corresponding conference sponsored by any association of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Inspired by Elder M. Russell Ballard’s 2007 call to use the Internet more effectively to spread the Gospel, I had already been intending to someday seriously think about perhaps getting around to eventually maybe launching something like Mormon Scholars Testify. It was, though, Thomas Cahill’s unexpected slur that finally impelled me to act.

I would, of course, agree with Mr. Cahill that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints hasn’t yet produced its equivalent of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologica. However, mainstream Christianity took twelve centuries to produce St. Thomas — he died in March 1274; it’s not coincidental, by the way, that one of my sons, born on that same date, bears his name — and the Restoration, not yet two centuries old, doesn’t seem to me to be doing dramatically worse on the intellectual front than the early Christians were at roughly AD 218.

I’m fond of several aphorisms from the eighteenth-century German physicist and satirist Georg Christoph Lichtenberg. Two of them remind me of the reactions of certain critics to the Book of Mormon: “A book is a mirror: if an ape looks into it an apostle is hardly likely to look out.” (Ein Buch ist Spiegel, aus dem kein Apostel herausgucken kann, wenn ein Affe hineinguckt.) “When a book and a head collide and a hollow sound is heard, must it always have come from the book?” (Wenn ein Buch und ein Kopf zusammenstoßen und es klingt hohl, ist das allemal im Buch?) But it seems to me that precisely the same things can validly be said about the reaction of certain critics to the Restored Gospel as a whole.

Moreover, for various reasons, I’m not convinced that Latter-day Saints should generate their own Summa Theologica. And St. Thomas himself might agree with me on that. The famous story is told of some sort of revelation given to him on 6 December 1273, roughly four months prior to his death, in the Dominican monastery at Naples. Although his works are voluminous, St. Thomas never wrote another line thereafter. He dictated nothing more to his socius, Reginald of Piperno. When Reginald begged him to continue with his work, Thomas replied “Reginald, I cannot, because all that I have written seems like straw to me [mihi videtur ut palea].”

Failure to produce a Summa is not, in my judgment, tantamount to shallow superficiality. There is, I’m convinced, great depth in the doctrines of the Restoration — whether or not we’ve done much thus far to explore that depth.

But the Church and the Gospel aren’t intended solely or even primarily for Thomist philosophers or Hegelians. Our services and Sunday school classes aren’t academic seminars in historiography or systematic theology. Like every other broad demographic group, the Saints are mostly people who don’t spend hours each day worrying about ontology, epistemology, counterfactual conditionals, or Angst in the works of Sartre. And the saving message of the Gospel is for them, every bit as much as it is for intellectuals and artistes.

I’m convinced that people will find depth in the Restoration commensurate to their own, if they put the requisite thought and effort into studying and reflecting on it. But, just as the exclamation “Fire!” doesn’t have to be philosophically deep in order to bear life-saving meaning, so too the theological depths of the Gospel don’t have to be fully charted before it can lead us to life-saving repentance. It would be a fool, and very likely soon a dead one, who refused to budge while the flames drew nearer simply because the person who had warned him to flee had shown insufficient intellectual or literary sophistication while doing it.

A well-known story is told about the prominent Swiss thinker Karl Barth (d. 1968; author of, among other important things, the massive and famous thirteen-volume Church Dogmatics), who is generally considered the greatest Protestant theologian of the twentieth century: After a lecture at the University of Chicago’s Rockefeller Chapel — or, perhaps, at Union Theological Seminary in Richmond, Virginia, or perhaps in both places (see here) — a student supposedly rose during the question-and-answer period to ask Barth whether his entire life’s work could be summarized in a single sentence. Yes indeed, Barth is said to have responded. “In the words of a song I learned at my mother’s knee: ‘Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so.'”

Simple, yes. But, if true, profound. Profoundly important. And very richly meaningful.

Joseph Smith Translation

Previous Post

August 18, 2020

The "shaky foundations of reality"

Next Post

August 19, 2020 Revision 4.1 "Islam and the Qur’an"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did Elisha perform many miracles?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samaria Jericho Shunem Bethel