Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

“New Study Finds Some Polynesians Carry DNA of Ancient Native Americans”

Last updated on: July 15, 2020 at 7:02 pm   by Dan Peterson

“New Study Finds Some Polynesians Carry DNA of Ancient Native Americans” 2020-07-15T19:02:39-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

May near Park City, Utah

The snow is gone now, and the mountains and trees are green. (This Wikimedia Commons public domain photo was taken in May.) I’m really fond of this Catholic church — St. Mary’s — that’s located just outside of Park City.

 

In case you missed this news, here’s a brief write-up from the Interpreter Foundation:  “New Study Finds Some Polynesians Carry DNA of Ancient Native Americans”

 

***

 

And here’s a response to a gross misrepresentation that is still remarkably — and shamefully — common in some circles:

 

“What Does Richard Bushman Believe About the Book of Mormon?”

 

***

 

I’ve sometimes had occasion on this blog to quote the explanation of his method as a detective that Sherlock Holmes once gave to Dr. Watson:  “First,” Holmes said, “you eliminate the impossible.  And, then, whatever’s left — however improbable — must be the truth.”

 

It seems quite simple, reminiscent of Michelangelo’s supposed explanation of his technique as a sculptor:  You take a block of marble, cut away everything that doesn’t belong, and the statue is what’s left over.

 

Easy peasy!

 

Obviously, though, it’s not easy.

 

And it’s perhaps especially difficult with philosophical and theological issues for which The Right Answer may never be unambiguously clear, this side of the veil.  Much depends, for example, on one’s prior assumptions about what is possible and what is impossible.  A commenter on one of my blog entries the other day, for instance, explained that it’s much more likely that Paul was suffering from a hallucination brought on by temporal lobe epilepsy along the road to Damascus than that he actually saw the resurrected Christ.  Well, that’s reasonable — on the assumption that resurrected beings flatly don’t exist, while temporal lobe epilepsy definitely does.

 

William Lane Craig is fond of recounting an experience that he had while debating an unbeliever (possibly at the University of California at Irvine) about the resurrection of Christ.  This unbelieving professor had written a doctoral dissertation on the New Testament data regarding the Christian resurrection claim — which, in Craig’s version of it, I recently outlined here, here, and here — and, at least according to Craig, really couldn’t dispute the four propositions upon which Craig’s argument rests.

 

So he created an alternative explanation that would also account for all four of Craig’s points:

 

It seems that Jesus had a previously unknown identical twin brother, who was raised separately.  When Jesus was crucified, this twin brother came to Jerusalem.  He stole the body of Jesus from the tomb and then “appeared” to the disciples, convincing them that he was Jesus, risen from the dead.

 

I know.  Rather ridiculous.  Obviously and rather desperately ad hoc.

 

But it’s all a matter of prior assumptions.  If you really think that Dr. Craig’s four points are unassailable but you’re convinced that resurrection is impossible (perhaps because you’re certain that there is no God), the extraordinarily unlikely identical-twin scenario is still far more likely than the notion that Jesus actually rose from the dead — the possibility of which is, per assumption, precisely zero.

 

“First,” Holmes said, “you eliminate the impossible.  And, then, whatever’s left — however improbable — must be the truth.”

 

Posted from Park City, Utah

 

 

Uncategorized

assumption

Book of Mormon

Bushman

colonization

DNA

Dr. Watson

genetic

Hagoth

immigration

Lamanite

Michelangelo

migration

Mormonism

Nephite

Polynesia

prior

Richard Bushman

Sherlock Holmes

South America

Previous Post



July 15, 2020

Revision 1.13 "The Mishnah and the Talmuds"

Next Post



July 15, 2020 Simple deception?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I told my daughter-in-law to uncover a man's feet and lie down at the threshing floor. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rebekah Naomi Ruth Bathsheba

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Of Pottery and People

Sic et Non

Family

Some notes on the archaeology of the Bible

Sic et Non

Family

A report from Moroni Day

Sic et Non

Family

A Night on Broadway in Orem

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026

He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube