Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
Once more, on the plague

Once more, on the plague

Last updated on: June 11, 2020 at 10:20 am by Dan Peterson

Once more, on the plague 2020-06-11T10:20:25-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’ll all end up here anyway, of course. So what’s the big deal?
(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)

My two very recent posts on the surge of coronavirus cases in Utah have received considerable pushback, as I pretty much expected they would:

“We’re headed for an upsurge in deaths, and there’s no valid reason for it”

“If you’re not taking this seriously, you’re wrong.”

The second of the two has come especially under fire.

I assiduously try to avoid politics on the Sabbath. But I do not see the coronavirus pandemic as solely or even primarily a political issue, so I’m going to address the criticisms of my two blog entries now rather than waiting for Monday.

First of all, I have been accused of trying to deprive others of their right to choose, and of endorsing statism and leftism. This is nonsense. Neither of my posts had a thing to say, one way or the other, about government-imposed lockdowns or mandatory face masks or anything of the sort. Both were exhortations to take COVID-19 seriously, and to make wise, prudent, and civic-minded — which is to say caring and loving — choices.

Second, a minor point: Some have attacked me for the positions expressed in the second post, when they should have noticed (I thought that I had made it perfectly clear) that I was quoting Dr. Sam LeFevre, a reader of this blog, who works at the Utah Department of Health and serves on the state’s coronavirus task force.

Third, some unusually careful readers of that second entry have responded that the links that it provides do not fully support some of the things that it says. In that light, and without waiting to ask his permission (since he had earlier given me what I regard as something of a general blank check to do this), I share three of his replies:

I have access to pay-for-subscription epidemiological journals. I did not share those links. To view those articles without the subscription is quite expensive. From those, I draw my conclusions, not from AARP. But I thought it useful to share AARP’s free information. Sorry for the confusion. I can however, share the more definitive links if you would like. The abstracts are free and might be interesting.

Here are some that talk about mechanisms where the full article is free:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih…

These are still emerging discoveries. As more case investigations become available, better numbers will become available.

***

Ryan, here and on Dr P’s previous post on the topic here has challenged some of my statements. And rightly so. Science works best with challenges.

To Ryan’s earlier challenges, directly to me, I responded that much of my opinions are formed through pay-for-subscription epidemiological journal articles that I have access to, but for those who do not have a subscription, are quite expensive to read. To quote Dr P recently, “I know things.” Because of the pay-for-subscription status of those articles, including articles that are so new, they are in pre-print and not available to link to, I do not provide those links. I do sometimes provide links to PubMed that is the free search engine to the National Library of Medicine.

The numbers I cited for the potential neurological involvement are really early numbers. As more data becomes available, we may find the number to be an over-estimate, or an under-estimate, or spot-on. I don’t yet know which.

I will here also admit that I am a poor excuse (as FK and g have pointed out) for a scientist (I believe, and no true scientist should). I am at best perhaps a modestly decent data modeler. And I am definitely not a pathologist (although I do know a few that I can talk to).

Asking you all to keep that confession in mind, I think more interesting than the early numbers is the mechanism. A free summary of the mechanism and the potential sequelae neurologic COVID infection can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go…

This (possibly fake news) AP article from late May is among those that first got me interested in the neurological involvement of COVID infections: https://apnews.com/32771c83…

And then there is this (definitely fake news) The Hill article: https://thehill.com/opinion…

I almost never pay attention to Medscape (because I have access to the source information) but this link provide a nice public review and links to the actual source information:https://www.medscape.com/vi…

Anyway, I apologize Ryan. I did not intend to start another firestorm. I appreciate that Ryan is among the deniers. I wish Ryan the very best enjoyment of his freedom, for as long as it lasts.

***

In further reading comments, I’ll also mention a couple of things that those of us who routinely read scientific literature are aware of:
(1) A single article rarely gives the complete story. They also rarely restate the obvious. Publication is expensive per inch.
(2) Authors routinely recommend further study (read as more grant funding please).
(3) Readers are expected to be able to connect the dots.

I don’t expect that we’ve reached the end of the discussion. If anybody wants to follow it further, I predict that the conversation will continue in the comments following the second blog entry (“If you’re not taking this seriously, you’re wrong.”) and, perhaps, in any that follow this one.

Previous Post

June 6, 2020

If you're not taking this seriously, you're wrong.

Next Post

June 7, 2020 A brief note on the suggestion of multiple universes

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did God tell Moses to remove his shoes because it was holy ground?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Sinai At the burning bush Egyptian palace Red Sea