Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

danpeterson

Four really challenging quotations

Last updated on: June 24, 2020 at 1:13 am   by Dan Peterson

Four really challenging quotations 2020-06-24T01:13:27-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

 

IAP, Princeton, Fuld Hall

Fuld Hall at the Institute for Advanced Study, from the back
(Wikimedia Commons public domain photo)

 

First, I share two quotations from two very vocal atheists.  The first comes from Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist, popular author, and emeritus Professor for Public Understanding of Science at the University of Oxford.  The second comes from one of the co-winners of the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics, Steven Weinberg:

 

 

The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.  (Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life)

 

It is almost irresistible for humans to believe that we have some special relation to the universe, that human life is not just a more-or-less farcical outcome of a chain of accidents reaching back to the first three minutes, but that we were somehow built in from the beginning. . . .  It is very hard to realise that this is all just a tiny part of an overwhelmingly hostile universe. It is even harder to realise that this present universe has evolved from an unspeakably unfamiliar early condition, and faces a future extinction of endless cold or intolerable heat. The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless. . . .  The effort to understand the universe is one of the very few things which lifts human life a little above the level of farce and gives it some of the grace of tragedy.  (Steven Weinberg, The First Three Minutes [1993], 154)

 

Pretty grim.

 

But Weinberg and Dawkins aren’t the only voices out there.  Consider this comment from Edward Witten, the Charles Simonyi Professor in the School of Natural Sciences at the Institute for Advanced Studies in Princeton, whom more than a few consider the most brilliant mathematical physicist alive:

 

There is really a feeling of wonder about the strangeness of the laws.  Because the laws of nature, to the extent that physicists have been able to unearth them, are extremely beautiful and harmonious, but also strange. . . .  And there is a second level of puzzlement, about why [these laws] have such delicate properties. . . .  Just with physics we already know, that galaxies, stars and planets roughly like ours could have formed, and that living things roughly like us could have formed depends on many details of the laws of physics as we currently know them being just the way they are and not being slightly different.  [I think] we’ll never resolve the sense of wonder about that.  (Edward Witten, from an interview)

 

And, finally, a thought from the late British theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and popular author Stephen Hawking (1942-2018):

 

Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?  (Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time)

 

 

Uncategorized

anthropic

atheism

atheistic

constants

cosmic

Dawkins

Edward Witten

fine

fine-tuned

fine-tuning

God

Godless

Institute for Advanced Study

laws

materialism

materialistic

naturalism

Oxford

physical

physics

Princeton

principle

Richard Dawkins

Stephen Hawking

Steven Weinberg

tuning

Witten

Previous Post



June 23, 2020

Liberal Islam and Illiberal Islam

Next Post



June 24, 2020 James J. Strang and His Witnesses, More or Less Revisited


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many plagues did God inflict upon Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 10 14 21

Related posts from Sic et Non

Family

Toward a "Post-Materialist Science"?

Sic et Non

Family

Some thoughts on mind and brain

Sic et Non

Family

Remote Viewing 1

Sic et Non

Family

For me, a kind of pilgrimage

Sic et Non

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

Archdiocese Hosts Military Marriage Retreat in Germany

RASTATT, Germany — The transient military lifestyle, with its frequent deployments and...

Minted in God's Image

Nearly every morning, I make the drive to Detroit with my high-school-age...

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a...

Walking through History

  A new article, written by Jeff Lindsay and Gale L. Pooley,...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube