Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Latter-day Saint
“A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest,” revisited

“A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest,” revisited

Last updated on: May 15, 2020 at 11:58 pm by Dan Peterson

“A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest,” revisited 2020-05-15T23:58:16-06:00 Dan Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The older “David Whitmer” speaking with a “reporter,” in a scene from the Interpreter Foundation’s forthcoming “Witnesses” theatrical film production. (Kindly furnished by director Mark Goodman)

In response to my immediately previous blog entry, entitled “David Whitmer’s June 1829 journey from Fayette to Harmony and back,” I received the following comment and question: “If you zoom in on the actor’s (who is playing David Whitmer) lower back, you can clearly see an electronic device of some sort with a bundle of wires. What is this?”

Now, I wasn’t on the set for the filming of the older David Whitmer in his livery stable. So, although I was confident that I knew the answer, I wrote to both the film’s executive producer, Russell Richins, and its director, Mark Goodman, for The Authoritative Word. Here are their replies:

Russell Richins: “It is a tie, part of his vest. Any mics or mic packs that were used were hidden very well. . . . We can vouch that it is not a mic or electronic device.”

Mark Goodman: “[I]t is a part of the clothing — period accurate clothing. There is actually a built in suspender that buttons to the pants along with ties.”

This isn’t our first go-around on this topic. So, in view of that fact, it seems that I need to re-post the blog entry below. I first posted it on 29 February 2020. Perhaps the problem derives from the fact that 29 February is a day that comes around only once every four years. In any event, the claim has plainly persisted in certain circles. So we now transition to the post of nearly two and a half months ago, including the photograph of “Martin Harris’s” back immediately below:

“Martin Harris” from behind in the Interpreter Foundation’s “Witnesses” film project.
Still photograph courtesy of Mark Goodman.

I’ve found myself thinking of the lyrics to an old Simon and Garfunkel song today. (See the title of this blog entry, taken from “The Boxer.”)

There is, in an odd corner of the Web, an odd message board that is devoted, to a really surprising degree, to anonymously criticizing me and all my works, day in and day out, month after month, year after year. This has been going on for about a decade and a half. Over the past year or two, some of the participants there have been posting blisteringly negative reviews of the Interpreter Foundation’s Witnesses film project, for which even the dramatic portion is still only in its roughcut version, still undergoing editing, and which will only be released to theaters in October 2020.

The early bird catches the worm, I suppose. It reminds me of the old joke where one academic asks another, “Have you read Rosenbloom’s new book?” “Read it?” responds the first professor. “I haven’t even reviewed it yet.”

For the past couple of days, these dedicated critics have focused their fire on a new video sampling, drawn from both the theatrical film and its accompanying documentary, that we’ve posted on the Witnesses website. Their unanimous consensus, of course, is that the movie will stink because the preliminary trailer stinks. It’s pathetic, amateurish, and so forth. Worst of all, I’m involved with it. As a prime example of our buffoonish incompetence, they point to the wireless microphone and wires hanging from the back of one of the actors, which they can clearly “see.”

But we didn’t use such wireless microphones and wires. We used boom mikes. Or, if you prefer, “boom mics.” (I really dislike that spelling, which seems to be prevalent despite my opinion of it.) What these ardent critics are seeing isn’t a wireless microphone and wire, it’s a vest that ties in the back.

I pointed this out to one of them who mustered up the courage to confront me directly (but anonymously) about the supposed wireless microphone right here on my own blog. He responded that I was entitled to “my opinion.” But, of course, it isn’t my “opinion.” We used boom mikes, not little wireless mikes mounted on the actors’ backs.

Templo en Nakum, Parque Yaxhá Nakum Naranjo, Reserva de la Biosfera Maya, Petén, Guatemala
(Wikimedia Commons public domain photograph)

However, this absurd little circus doesn’t just remind me of Simon and Garfunkel. It also makes me think of A Midsummer Night’s Dream III.ii.115: “Lord, what fools these mortals be!” And it reminds me of a blog entry that I originally posted back in August 2019 (accompanied by the photograph immediately above). In the early days, explorers and proto-archaeologists were often literally walking over the remains of Pre-Columbian fortifications — walls of timber and cast-up dirt that encircled abandoned cities but that had “melted” in the heavy Mesoamerican rains — without seeing them. And why did they not see them? Because they didn’t expect to see them.

Here’s what I posted last August:

“Ancient Mayan city burned in ‘act of total war,’ scientists say”

And thanks to Jason Holker for calling this article to my attention:

“Ancient Maya warfare flared up surprisingly early: Extreme conflicts broke out well before the civilization’s decline, researchers say”

I’m reminded of Mormon 8:7-8:

And behold, the Lamanites have hunted my people, the Nephites, down from city to city and from place to place, even until they are no more; and great has been their fall; yea, great and marvelous is the destruction of my people, the Nephites.

And behold, it is the hand of the Lord which hath done it. And behold also, the Lamanites are at war one with another; and the whole face of this land is one continual round of murder and bloodshed; and no one knoweth the end of the war.

I’m also reminded of something that I wrote in a review of a now long and deservedly forgotten anti-Mormon book back in 1989 or 1990:

The Book of Mormon speaks of terrible wars occurring among its peoples, as Bartley correctly points out. Yet the Maya “were on the whole a peaceful people. Their ceremonial centres had no fortifications, and were for the most part located in places incapable of defence” (p. 53). Bartley here assumes a simple equation of the Maya with the peoples of the Book of Mormon which may or may not be accurate—but, more importantly, he fails to mention Sorenson’s treatment of this issue. Nor does he show the slightest awareness of the evidence now available on “the state of war that existed constantly among many Maya cities. The modern myth that the Maya were a peace-loving, gentle people who only tended their milpas and followed the stars has fallen with a thunderous crash.” Yale Mayanist Michael D. Coe puts it simply: “The Maya were obsessed with war. The Annals of the Cakciquels and the Popol Vuh speak of little but intertribal conflict among the highlanders, while the sixteen states of Yucatan were constantly battling with each other over boundaries and lineage honour. To this sanguinary record we must add the testimony of the Classic monuments and their inscriptions.” A brief glance at the volume The Blood of Kings: Dynasty and Ritual in Maya Art is all that is needed to show clearly that the Maya were among the most bloodthirsty people in world history.

Which, in turn, reminds me of this:

“The Hidden Coastal Culture of the Ancient Maya: For thousands of years, ancient Maya kings ruled a vast inland empire in Mexico and Belize. But just how inland was it, really?”

From the article:

“Modern scientists have found that the real ancient Maya were just as war-prone as Aztecs or Europeans. . . . Contrary to their reputation, the ancient Maya engaged in plenty of warfare.”

Also from the article:

“The presence of pirates of the ancient Caribbean might . . . explain the tall pyramid [at the coastal site of Vista Allegre, not far from Cancún near the point of the Yucatán Peninsula] that could serve dual functions: for religious ceremonies and as a lookout.”

Which, in turn, reminds me of the portion of the story of Gideon and King Noah recounted in Mosiah 19:5-6:

And it came to pass that he fought with the king; and when the king saw that he was about to overpower him, he fled and ran and got upon the tower which was near the temple.

And Gideon pursued after him and was about to get upon the tower to slay the king, and the king cast his eyes round about towards the land of Shemlon, and behold, the army of the Lamanites were within the borders of the land.

Uncategorized

Book of Mormon

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

film

Interpreter

Interpreter Foundation

Interpreter Radio Show

Previous Post

May 11, 2020

David Whitmer's June 1829 journey from Fayette to Harmony and back

Next Post

May 12, 2020 At the very foundation of the Restoration

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 March 2014 August 2013 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Jacob's favorite son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph Judah Dan Levi